Jump to content

Featured Replies

58 minutes ago, ArtificialWisdom said:

Mine finally came through literally 2 minutes ago. Try looking again now

Yeah mine appeared about the same time too, took them a while but all set now

 
On 2/26/2022 at 1:25 PM, Sir Why You Little said:

Why is it being played at “Soulless Stadium”?

is this so the caterers can charge full price?

Nailed it! 

 

Interesting selections 

What happened to S May ?
 

MELBOURNE

B: J.Bowey 17 J.Lever 8 J.Smith 44
HB: J.Harmes 4 A.Tomlinson 20 J.Hunt 29
C: A.Brayshaw 10 J.Viney 7 E.Langdon 15
HF: S.Weideman 26 T.McDonald 25 T.Sparrow 32
F: B.Fritsch 31 B.Brown 50 A.Neal-Bullen 30
Foll: M.Gawn - C 11 C.Petracca 5 C.Oliver 13
I/C: L.Jackson 6 C.Spargo 9 T.Bedford 12 J.Jordon 23 O.Baker 33 K.Pickett 36 K.Chandler 37 D.Turner 42  

Emerg: B.Laurie 16 B.Howes 22  M.Brown 38 J.McVee  41 

Notable absentees: Harrison Petty, Michael Hibberd, Trent Rivers, Christian Salem

Rivers PCL… ?May went off against Nth so maybe residual soreness. McKay & Curnow maybe doubtful …


3 minutes ago, Cyclops said:

May not named to play against Carlton??

I reckon he came off with hammy tightness last week. Absolutely not worth the risk. Same with Salem who copped a knee knock. 
Besides they’re obviously experimenting with the backline as it’s going to be the hardest part of the field to pick this season given the large amount of players we have pushing for selection. 
It’s a practice game. I hope Trac and Oliver play a half and get put on ice along with Gawn. All three hold our back to back fate in their hands. 

So Salem's injury may be more than has been reported.  Best to get him (and others) cherry ripe for March 16.

 
2 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

So Salem's injury may be more than has been reported.  Best to get him (and others) cherry ripe for March 16.

I reckon if we play round 1 tomorrow he and May both play. But if he’s a bit sore why risk it right? 
 

4 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

So Salem's injury may be more than has been reported.  Best to get him (and others) cherry ripe for March 16.

Injury List

Michael Hibberd
Soreness | Ready for Round 1

Steven May
Soreness | Ready for Round 1

Christian Salem
Knee Soreness | Ready for Round 1

Trent Rivers
Knee/PCL | 3-4 weeks

Harrison Petty
Calf | 3-4 weeks


4 minutes ago, The Swimming Dee said:

Where is Luke Dunstan at?

Good question. Interesting that he hasn’t played either practice game and no mention of any injury. 
Maybe the club wasn’t happy with his fitness base so they’re pushing him to complete a longer pre season? He did come from St Kilda and said our training standards were nothing he’s ever seen before. 

9 minutes ago, The Swimming Dee said:

Where is Luke Dunstan at?

Our first choice midfield is all fit and healthy. 
 

Maybe a surprise he’s not an emergency but hardly a surprise he isn’t in the team. 

2 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Injury List

Michael Hibberd
Soreness | Ready for Round 1

Steven May
Soreness | Ready for Round 1

Christian Salem
Knee Soreness | Ready for Round 1

Trent Rivers
Knee/PCL | 3-4 weeks

Harrison Petty
Calf | 3-4 weeks

Thanks, I hadn't seen that.

Its a shame for Rivers 3-4 weeks but it gives the likes of Hunt a chance to get his spot back.

Looks like we will have 3 tall fwds plus Jackson/Gawn resting forward.  We experimented with that a few years ago and iirc it didn't go well so it will be interesting to see how it goes this time.  I guess that is what practice matches are for.

5 of our premiership backline out!

Tomlinson, Hunt and Smith fill 3 spots. 

Harmes listed back, but it might be Brayshaw come game day.

Weideman, Turner or Baker perhaps the 7th defender.

As iterated in my Captains Run report May did not complete training and was running laps . Salem completed most training. Great to see Jayden Hunt back🤩


5 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

5 of our premiership backline out!

Tomlinson, Hunt and Smith fill 3 spots. 

Harmes listed back, but it might be Brayshaw come game day.

Weideman, Turner or Baker perhaps the 7th defender.

Pretty good depth backline still looks decent even with the outs 

I really like Harms but he was an utter failure at half back when tried there a season or two ago. My guess is, they will be starting Baker there.

As much as I’d like to beat blues at every chance, might not be the worst thing if we took a loss, just like last year vs dogs. It spurred the boys onto the run of wins we had 

11 minutes ago, Garbo said:

As much as I’d like to beat blues at every chance, might not be the worst thing if we took a loss, just like last year vs dogs. It spurred the boys onto the run of wins we had 

No benefits come from expecting a loss. If we play well and lose then so be it but saying a loss to Carlton would be a good thing is ludicrous 

Carlton would have to play out of their skins and we would be disinterested to lose based on the two sides presented….


As i suspected, a repeat of last years strategy in terms of selections for the practice match and community series. 

Barring injury i expect the round one team will mirror the lineup against the roos.

With one exception - Lever in and one of Tomlinson or Smith out (i think Smith will ply round one)

5 hours ago, Cards13 said:

Will be interesting to see how teams look to break the system ie lower the eyes when coming into the fwd 50.

Or break with as much speed as possible and put the ball into space?

 

Agree.

My feeling is the best way to break our system is playing on at every opportunity, playing fast and using the corridor. - the way the Crows played the first time we played them. 

With our scoring power, to beat us teams have to score at least 85 - 95 points and the only way they are gong to do that is being super attacking.

It's Catch 22 though because playing fast is high risk and we are so good at blocking the corridor, shifting our zone to stay ahead of the ball and punishing teams on turnovers with slingshot rebounds.

And teams that play fast struggle to set up their defensive structure when the ball is turned over.

But slowing the game down like the Cats tried to do in the last quarter in round 23 just plays into our hands 

11 minutes ago, binman said:

As i suspected, a repeat of last years strategy in terms of selections for the practice match and community series. 

Barring injury i expect the round one team will mirror the lineup against the roos.

With one exception - Lever in and one of Tomlinson or Smith out (i think Smith will ply round one)

You mean a repeat of last years strategy of picking our best possible 22 without risking injured/sore players? 
 

We’ve picked our first choice midfield and forward line, unfortunate a few defenders pulled up sore otherwise we would’ve picked them too. 

 

So we'll be missing three 'running' defenders, Salem, Riv and Hibberd. Obviously, Hunt can play one of these positions but it will be interesting to see if we lose any run from our backline in this game.

1 hour ago, Jaded No More said:

Good question. Interesting that he hasn’t played either practice game and no mention of any injury. 
Maybe the club wasn’t happy with his fitness base so they’re pushing him to complete a longer pre season? He did come from St Kilda and said our training standards were nothing he’s ever seen before. 

Agree with this. It’s strange that there is no mention of him


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 528 replies