Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

Traded out 43 for a third next year

Guess we don’t want anyone other than woewodin, otherwise it doesn’t make much sense, to get better than 43 next year crows going to need to be bottom 4 again 

Edited by Garbo

 

The whole 'can't trade multiple future picks' is to stop a team trading their future away. Not sure how the AFL thought that was an issue with us

 
1 minute ago, Northern Summer said:

Has anyone matched a bid for Woewodin then? Or don't we know yet?

Not yet mate. Will likely use our last pick on him. (Or will we??!?!)


1 minute ago, Mickey said:

The whole 'can't trade multiple future picks' is to stop a team trading their future away. Not sure how the AFL thought that was an issue with us

Wasn’t for that.

it was for swapping picks we’ve already swapped with the crows. Attempt to stop academy bidding nonsense 

JT might have to do a Sos/Dodoro and get one of his colleagues to bid for Woey just before our pick so we get the match factor going for him. Otherwise we’ll grab him 

 
3 minutes ago, BAMF said:

Not yet mate. Will likely use our last pick on him. (Or will we??!?!)

Hope so, oh please, oh please🤞

4 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Wasn’t for that.

it was for swapping picks we’ve already swapped with the crows. Attempt to stop academy bidding nonsense 

Do we know what the trade was? Were we using pick 39 along with another pick to move up to 35? 

Or were we just trying to get 35 to go with 39?


1 minute ago, BAMF said:

Do we know what the trade was? Were we using pick 39 along with another pick to move up to 35? 

Or were we just trying to get 35 to go with 39?

No idea, but my guess is 

36 and the Crows future 3rd 

For 39 and 43

Then we ended up just doing the second half of that.
 

We swapped 36 and 39 with the Crows during trade week so that was banned. 

We only planned 3 picks so unless we loved Soligo or the guys who went 37, 38 I can’t imagine we would’ve taken 2 picks there 

21 minutes ago, Mickey said:

The whole 'can't trade multiple future picks' is to stop a team trading their future away. Not sure how the AFL thought that was an issue with us

Something to do with the Filth?

We could have taken Williams with the pick we traded, giving us a Hawkins type who can ruck a bit as well as key forward.

Andy M-W looking likely rookie and If no one picks Taj he could then be another. Are we looking at a ruck forward type in maybe Caminitti, or however you spell his name?

Interesting to see the plan.

40 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Looks like Rooey, Howey and Woey.  Goody should be happy.  

Bowey to Howey to Woey to Rooey. Goal!

Edited by John Demonic


21 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Looks like Rooey, Howey and Woey.  Goody should be happy.  

If  you ask me, Demonstone, I reckon we just ran away with the chockie biscuits from these two draft rounds. JvR and BH were quite literally what we needed for our list - and were two young blokes so very close to the best available across both rounds. 

6 minutes ago, Deemania since 56 said:

Something to do with the Filth?

DeeSpencer pointed out it's because we were trying to trade 36 and 39, which we'd traded with Adelaide in the trade period. Can't retrade the same picks to the same team

6 minutes ago, John Demonic said:

Bowie to Howey to Woey to Rooey. Goal!

...but, it was Gorney who cleared from the centre, as well.

Edited by Deemania since 56

Montagna really is a shill for Geelong, Hawthorn, Essendon and St Kilda. 


Traded 51 for St Kildas 2022 round 4 pick.

Clearly happy to just match the bid for Woey 

Just now, Seraph said:

51 traded out for a R4 2022, no Taj?

We need to take 3 players so we will get him at some point 

 

Taj will be with pick 150 or whatever we have left, or rookie list?

3 minutes ago, Seraph said:

51 traded out for a R4 2022, no Taj?

Why would we do that? Best case is saints finish last and that pick would only give us 55 without any fs or nga bids. Doesn’t make sense


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 56 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Thumb Down
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 218 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 34 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road again and this may be the last roll of the dice to get their 2025 season back on track as they take on the Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium.

    • 546 replies