3 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

Traded out 43 for a third next year

Guess we don’t want anyone other than woewodin, otherwise it doesn’t make much sense, to get better than 43 next year crows going to need to be bottom 4 again 

Edited November 25, 20213 yr by Garbo

The whole 'can't trade multiple future picks' is to stop a team trading their future away. Not sure how the AFL thought that was an issue with us

It’s Blake Howes. 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻That is a great result 

Yeah, an amazing result. JVR and Howes! Presumably we will also pick up Taj with our last pick. Great result.

1 minute ago, Northern Summer said:

Has anyone matched a bid for Woewodin then? Or don't we know yet?

Not yet mate. Will likely use our last pick on him. (Or will we??!?!)

1 minute ago, Mickey said:

The whole 'can't trade multiple future picks' is to stop a team trading their future away. Not sure how the AFL thought that was an issue with us

Wasn’t for that.

it was for swapping picks we’ve already swapped with the crows. Attempt to stop academy bidding nonsense 

JT might have to do a Sos/Dodoro and get one of his colleagues to bid for Woey just before our pick so we get the match factor going for him. Otherwise we’ll grab him 

Looks like Rooey, Howey and Woey.  Goody should be happy.  

3 minutes ago, BAMF said:

Not yet mate. Will likely use our last pick on him. (Or will we??!?!)

Hope so, oh please, oh please🤞

4 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Wasn’t for that.

it was for swapping picks we’ve already swapped with the crows. Attempt to stop academy bidding nonsense 

Do we know what the trade was? Were we using pick 39 along with another pick to move up to 35? 

Or were we just trying to get 35 to go with 39?

1 minute ago, BAMF said:

Do we know what the trade was? Were we using pick 39 along with another pick to move up to 35? 

Or were we just trying to get 35 to go with 39?

No idea, but my guess is 

36 and the Crows future 3rd 

For 39 and 43

Then we ended up just doing the second half of that.
 

We swapped 36 and 39 with the Crows during trade week so that was banned. 

We only planned 3 picks so unless we loved Soligo or the guys who went 37, 38 I can’t imagine we would’ve taken 2 picks there 

21 minutes ago, Mickey said:

The whole 'can't trade multiple future picks' is to stop a team trading their future away. Not sure how the AFL thought that was an issue with us

Something to do with the Filth?

We could have taken Williams with the pick we traded, giving us a Hawkins type who can ruck a bit as well as key forward.

Andy M-W looking likely rookie and If no one picks Taj he could then be another. Are we looking at a ruck forward type in maybe Caminitti, or however you spell his name?

Interesting to see the plan.

40 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Looks like Rooey, Howey and Woey.  Goody should be happy.  

Bowey to Howey to Woey to Rooey. Goal!

Edited November 25, 20213 yr by John Demonic

28 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

Traded out 43 for a third next year

Yes called this out earlier. Smart move. JT is a zen master. No doubt.  

21 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Looks like Rooey, Howey and Woey.  Goody should be happy.  

If  you ask me, Demonstone, I reckon we just ran away with the chockie biscuits from these two draft rounds. JvR and BH were quite literally what we needed for our list - and were two young blokes so very close to the best available across both rounds. 

6 minutes ago, Deemania since 56 said:

Something to do with the Filth?

DeeSpencer pointed out it's because we were trying to trade 36 and 39, which we'd traded with Adelaide in the trade period. Can't retrade the same picks to the same team

6 minutes ago, John Demonic said:

Bowie to Howey to Woey to Rooey. Goal!

...but, it was Gorney who cleared from the centre, as well.

Edited November 25, 20213 yr by Deemania since 56

Montagna really is a shill for Geelong, Hawthorn, Essendon and St Kilda. 

Is Jack Williams still on the board?

At least a chance for us to get a power forward in the mould of Locket but one that can run

Traded 51 for St Kildas 2022 round 4 pick.

Clearly happy to just match the bid for Woey 

51 traded out for a R4 2022, no Taj?

Just now, Seraph said:

51 traded out for a R4 2022, no Taj?

We need to take 3 players so we will get him at some point 

Taj will be with pick 150 or whatever we have left, or rookie list?

3 minutes ago, Seraph said:

51 traded out for a R4 2022, no Taj?

Why would we do that? Best case is saints finish last and that pick would only give us 55 without any fs or nga bids. Doesn’t make sense