Jump to content

Featured Replies

41 minutes ago, Cassiew said:

I can’t find the link to it but the 1988 was sensational. It was by far the best poster he did for us.

Now that he’s selling them and if by some chance we do lose, is he going to reuse it again if we make another one?

Well our record in Grand Finals is really pretty good, so in theory they've only got four up their sleeves.

1958 which they've  obviously used for this year. The year 2000 which we've seen someone show already. So that just leaves 1988 and 1954 as the other options.

 
  • Author
3 minutes ago, MadAsHell said:

Well our record in Grand Finals is really pretty good, so in theory they've only got four up their sleeves.

1958 which they've  obviously used for this year. The year 2000 which we've seen someone show already. So that just leaves 1988 and 1954 as the other options.

He told me that weg did several of each team before he died. That way they only need to add the year.

If you look closely, he has tweaked that Demon. He’s made it a bit thinner, his forehead, made him darker red, etc. I don’t have any real problems with that, but if they’re tweaking, why didn’t they make the last fork on the pitchfork the same size? It makes it less obvious what he’s doing in the poster.

Love this idea for the wall, but screw having a giant herald sun logo in my house. That paper can get in the bin.

 
  • Author
12 hours ago, BAMF said:

He is interviewed on 5he afl exchange podcasts and said the Demons marketing team had a few things to say.

No cheese platers.

No range rovers.

No skis.

Don't make the demon too red.

He sounded a bit miffed by it.

It’s pathetic that they still even mention those jokes. We’ve won the minor premiership and are favourites in the grand final. They’re redundant now. People are so used to Melbourne being the whipping boys, they can’t accept that its the direct opposite now. I wonder how long they went on about a Brisbane like this when they won their hat trick? 
Sad really

  • Author

Here's a better view of it:

 

image0-imresizer.jpg


22 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

I'm not usually a huge fan of the Knight posters (his Richmond ones were terrible) but I actually don't mind that Demons one.

A wegart one has also been released, basically rips off the unused 1958 one which doesn't make sense, would've preferred they went with the unused 2000 one.

2021%20Weg%20Art%20Website%20%20Demons.j

Ohh that poster is awesome 

that will look great on the wall :)

That Mark Knight Demon is a little disturbing. 
looks like he has popped about five eccy tabs 30 minutes ago

 
8 minutes ago, Stevienic23 said:

I feel sickScreenshot_20210923-173757_Facebook.thumb.jpg.1bca1c4c3ee451ebf6c306314443e0e9.jpg

It’s not being sold by us so doesn’t count. Don’t stress. 

  • Author

I would have preferred a little hair on his head, a bit more red, bigger/longer horns and I don’t know why the 1964 tattoo is there (was 1954 on the Dogs 2016 poster?) but otherwise I’m pretty happy. I mean it’s the best we could expect from Mark Knight. He’s no Weg.

 

Edited by Cassiew


23 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

I'm not usually a huge fan of the Knight posters (his Richmond ones were terrible) but I actually don't mind that Demons one.

A wegart one has also been released, basically rips off the unused 1958 one which doesn't make sense, would've preferred they went with the unused 2000 one.

2021%20Weg%20Art%20Website%20%20Demons.j

I like it

and if we win I am sure no one will care

26 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

That Mark Knight Demon is a little disturbing. 
looks like he has popped about five eccy tabs 30 minutes ago

If we win I'm totally gunna munch down a bag of them.

My face will look similar I'm guessing.

1 minute ago, faultydet said:

If we win I'm totally gunna munch down a bag of them.

My face will look similar I'm guessing.

haha 
Run to Melbourne!!!

I still have a 64 poster I  got from Mr Friedman’s paper shop, on that Saturday night, 

folded and a little ripped, I had it plastic embalmed so it would not get worse. 
 

still think the Weg posters are better.  Go Dees


I much prefer the '21 Weg edition to the Mark Knight one. I'll definitely get one I can frame but I'd prefer it didn't have the little Wegart logo that draws your eye to the bottom left corner. Those demons from our 1950's era look fantastic. 

  • Author
3 minutes ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

I much prefer the '21 Weg edition to the Mark Knight one. I'll definitely get one I can frame but I'd prefer it didn't have the little Wegart logo that draws your eye to the bottom left corner. Those demons from our 1950's era look fantastic. 

It doesn’t. The actual posters don’t. It a watermark to prevent people making their own copies without ordering it

2 minutes ago, Cassiew said:

It doesn’t. The actual posters don’t. It a watermark to prevent people making their own copies without ordering it

Fabulous. Thanks for the heads up Cass!

On 9/23/2021 at 6:10 PM, Cassiew said:

Here's a better view of it:

 

image0-imresizer.jpg

Not bad! It looks pretty good. Would of liked the horns bigger!

I like the WEG style poster too. Although using the 1958 Grand Final WEG poster is a bit odd, I would of preferred the 2000 Grand Final WEG poster but that's just my own opinion.

Anyway, we will see what happens Saturday evening I guess? Fingers crossed! 🤞

GO DEMONS!!!

  • Author
7 hours ago, Supreme_Demon said:

Not bad! It looks pretty good. Would of liked the horns bigger!

I like the WEG style poster too. Although using the 1958 Grand Final WEG poster is a bit odd, I would of preferred the 2000 Grand Final WEG poster but that's just my own opinion.

Anyway, we will see what happens Saturday evening I guess? Fingers crossed! 🤞

GO DEMONS!!!

Like I said, hairs do more red would have been better. But we can’t blame him as we apparently requested less hair.

I’d happily put that on my wall. Got enough family photos there already 


  • Author

Ordered two of both. Weg and Knight. Had to get them laminated as normal sold out

2 hours ago, Cassiew said:

Ordered two of both. Weg and Knight. Had to get them laminated as normal sold out

Agreed. Seems the merchandise was pre bought by scalpers.  Now selling on eBay to profiteer from our success. They should be available for members only imv 

FYI: Allocations of both the White Limited edition and the Foil edition are currently exhausted, so we are releasing the final limited edition product, the 2021 Mark Knight Premium edition print.  
 
The Premium Edition print is limited to 1000 prints, and is printed on a matt blue and red background, with a high gloss image. Premium edition prints cost $70 plus delivery.
 
Melbourne Football club members will be given priority access to purchase the 2021 Mark Knight Premium edition print. 
 
To access the priority allocation, please complete the Premium Print members registration via the link below.
 
 
1 hour ago, Range Rover to the snow said:
FYI: Allocations of both the White Limited edition and the Foil edition are currently exhausted, so we are releasing the final limited edition product, the 2021 Mark Knight Premium edition print.  
 
The Premium Edition print is limited to 1000 prints, and is printed on a matt blue and red background, with a high gloss image. Premium edition prints cost $70 plus delivery.
 
Melbourne Football club members will be given priority access to purchase the 2021 Mark Knight Premium edition print. 
 
To access the priority allocation, please complete the Premium Print members registration via the link below.
 

Thanks applied for this, but also uncertain how it'll look with the background.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 383 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies