Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, Demonstone said:

No.  His family live in Melbourne and accommodate young Demon draftees.

Obviously he has Andrew in WA playing for Freo and I believe Hamish is captain of a WAFL club. There's also extended family in WA. The Brayshaw name has a rich sporting history in that state.

But yes, Gus' parents live in Victoria.

 
26 minutes ago, Stiff Arm said:

Obviously he has Andrew in WA playing for Freo and I believe Hamish is captain of a WAFL club. There's also extended family in WA. The Brayshaw name has a rich sporting history in that state.

But yes, Gus' parents live in Victoria.

and gf....and uncle

48 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

and gf....and uncle

So he has people close to him in both states. Thank you dc.

 

Parents + GF > Brothers + Extended

Just maths.

But anything to buttress up a slim argument hey?

We are out of the race for this guy as we have no valid picks and need the cap room for others.  Unless:

  • someone wants out to Freo (we won’t be pushing any top 25 players out of the team, we are in the window now and culture is critical)
  • he nominates us and comes on low dollars. Think we need cap space to manage our current list more than to throw at others.

even then, doubt we can make this happen.  Future first would be projected at 18, so that is not enough.  The best thing is our list looks good enough for now, so we can build the future in behind what we have rather than needing a type of player to fill a hole.  We can now avoid paying overs and chasing targets, instead they might just start wanting to come to us.


9 minutes ago, buck_nekkid said:

We are out of the race for this guy as we have no valid picks and need the cap room for others.  Unless:

  • someone wants out to Freo (we won’t be pushing any top 25 players out of the team, we are in the window now and culture is critical)
  • he nominates us and comes on low dollars. Think we need cap space to manage our current list more than to throw at others.

even then, doubt we can make this happen.  Future first would be projected at 18, so that is not enough.  The best thing is our list looks good enough for now, so we can build the future in behind what we have rather than needing a type of player to fill a hole.  We can now avoid paying overs and chasing targets, instead they might just start wanting to come to us.

Don't be so sure, we have some options to put together a package, if he's someone we really want

1 hour ago, rpfc said:

Parents + GF > Brothers + Extended

Just maths.

But anything to buttress up a slim argument hey?

Mate, I'm not arguing. Just noting that he has family in WA to a poster who said he did not. You are the one pitching for an argument out of nothing. 

3 minutes ago, Dwight Schrute said:

Don't be so sure, we have some options to put together a package, if he's someone we really want

We have access to our future first rounder and have a good record of using future picks. Maybe not for Cerra, could be for someone else or another pick split. 

 

It’ll be a challenge but not impossible. 
Dangerfield nominated Geelong in 2015 and was traded for the Cats picks 9 and 28 and got Dean Gore who has since moved on after hardly striking a blow.

I’m not nominating any of our current listed players to form part of a package that bundled up with multiple draft picks over multiple years could amount to something of reasonable worth to the Dockers. 
But as with Crows, worth is calculated up front but value is only realised afterwards.  

2 hours ago, rpfc said:

Parents + GF > Brothers + Extended

Just maths.

But anything to buttress up a slim argument hey?

It wasn't a slim argument, I thought for some reason his whole family resided in WA. I've been corrected so my post is now irrelevant.


1 hour ago, buck_nekkid said:

We are out of the race for this guy as we have no valid picks and need the cap room for others.  Unless:

  • someone wants out to Freo (we won’t be pushing any top 25 players out of the team, we are in the window now and culture is critical)
  • he nominates us and comes on low dollars. Think we need cap space to manage our current list more than to throw at others.

even then, doubt we can make this happen.  Future first would be projected at 18, so that is not enough.  The best thing is our list looks good enough for now, so we can build the future in behind what we have rather than needing a type of player to fill a hole.  We can now avoid paying overs and chasing targets, instead they might just start wanting to come to us.

If he nominates us, we'll facilitate a trade. In past seasons where trading future picks weren't a thing, we'd have little to no way of executing other then giving up a quality young player or two. 

But we could make this happen with smart trading of picks and maybe we'll be giving up a weed or someone on the fringe to acquire more picks. There will always be clubs looking for bulk pick swaps for one high pick.

It can happen. 

And it's exciting. Perhaps I've got my dees cap on, but if I was Cerra I'd be concerned about what's gong on at the blues atm. They're a rabble. We're in the best position we've ever been in regards to being a destination club and it doesn't always last long. So in my view, if we're a sniff for landing him we should be going hard at it.

I watched Cerra in his draft year when I was doing some scouting and he is all class. His use and composure is something we've lacked and he's exactly what we're missing in that midfield mix. 

Also, hasn't had a break out year so his potential is still enormous and works in our favour as far as facilitating a trade goes. 

Edited by JimmyGadson

43 minutes ago, Stiff Arm said:

Mate, I'm not arguing. Just noting that he has family in WA to a poster who said he did not. You are the one pitching for an argument out of nothing. 

image.gif.dbb61aa853546c0f15dbfb21b8977f66.gif

16 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

It wasn't a slim argument, I thought for some reason his whole family resided in WA. I've been corrected so my post is now irrelevant.

I love you Dr, but it is always the throwaway argument for blokes in trade discussions and usually not given the same weight for players we wish to keep! 

Jackson’s family is most definitely in WA…

8 minutes ago, A F said:

Anyone know if there's anything of substance in this article? (I can't view it...)

https://thewest.com.au/sport/afl-trades/afl-trades-2021-melbourne-demons-emerge-as-surprise-adam-cerra-suitor-c-3855377

Mark DuffieldThe West Australian
Thu, 2 September 2021 5:27PM
Comments
Mark Duffield
Melbourne have emerged as a potential second suitor for homesick Fremantle midfielder Adam Cerra.
It has been assumed that Carlton had the inside running on the Cerra trade after the 21-year-old told Fremantle just days after the completion of the 2021 home and away season that he wanted to be traded back to Victoria.
Sources close to Cerra believed the Blues had the draft collateral to get the trade done but have this week confirmed that Melbourne had also shown interest.
The Blues have pick six in the national draft which would become pick eight after the predicted early father-son bids for Nick Daicos (Collingwood) and Sam Darcy (Western Bulldogs) which are certain to be matched by those clubs.
The sticking point in trade talks is that the Dockers are likely to ask for something on top of that draft pick.

It is not clear how Melbourne could get the deal done on draft picks alone given they have no first-round pick in the draft and will not take their first selection until at least pick 36 once you factor in the two early father-son bids.
There is no indication at this point that the Demons would be willing to part ways with their Rising Star winner Luke Jackson who was recruited from WA and is contracted for another season.
The Demons also have Trent Rivers from Western Australia while Fremantle had shown a very keen interest in Kysaiah Pickett before the Demons scrambled up the draft order to get him in the first round at the 2019 national draft.
Rivers, 20, has played 32 games including all 23 so far this season and is expected to figure in Melbourne’s preliminary final team. He is contracted until 2023.
Pickett, also 20, has also played all 23 games this season and emerged as a genuine star of the AFL kicking 37 goals, is contracted until the end of 2022.
Meanwhile the Dockers are continuing their talks with small forward Lachie Schultz who has been strongly courted by Hawthorn.
It is understood Schultz appeared set to re-sign before Hawthorn upped their offer which is now believed to be for three years. Schultz can leave the Dockers as an unrestricted free agent if he chooses to join the Hawks.
The Dockers remain optimistic that the 23-year-old will stay. He kicked 22 goals from 20 games in 2021 for a total of 38 from 44 games over three seasons.


Thanks for sharing @dazzledavey36.

No new information in the article. I'd be shocked and upset if we can looked at trading one of Jackson, Rivers or Pickett. The article is pure speculation. The only situation I can see playing out is if a player said I want to go to WA.

It will be interesting to know if Cerra is waiting on the Blues coaching situation or if he is actually contemplating another club. 

Maybe he is waiting to see how serious club offers are before nominationg. But where there is smoke there is fire...Exciting times.

 

Edited by COVID Dan

2 minutes ago, COVID Dan said:

Thanks for sharing @dazzledavey36.

No new information in the article. I'd be shocked and upset if we can looked at trading one of Jackson, Rivers or Pickett. The article is pure speculation.

It will be interesting to know if Cerra is waiting on the Blues coaching situation or if he is actually contemplating another club.

Maybe he is waiting to see how serious club offers are before nominationg. Exciting times

 

I think that he is talking hypothetical, that's his idea how it could be done.  It would shock me if the Dees even or ever considered trading any of the players mentioned.

Why would you?

2 minutes ago, Dante said:

I think that he is talking hypothetical, that's his idea how it could be done.  It would shock me if the Dees even or ever considered trading any of the players mentioned.

Why would you?

I agree you wouldn't trade any of the named players.

We do have future picks and fringe players who may interest Freo.  It wouldn't be impossible to get a trade done IF Cerra nominated us, but there would be a lot of work to do to get it done.

My point was the article didn't tell us Cerra is interested in us, or any other team and that is the key information.

The Weid a future first and second round picks plus our 2 second round picks should do it surely?

20 minutes ago, COVID Dan said:

Thanks for sharing @dazzledavey36.

No new information in the article. I'd be shocked and upset if we can looked at trading one of Jackson, Rivers or Pickett. The article is pure speculation. The only situation I can see playing out is if a player said I want to go to WA.

It will be interesting to know if Cerra is waiting on the Blues coaching situation or if he is actually contemplating another club. 

Maybe he is waiting to see how serious club offers are before nominationg. But where there is smoke there is fire...Exciting times.

 

I agree, bit of a nothing article.


10 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

The Weid a future first and second round picks plus our 2 second round picks should do it surely?

All depends on what the seller wants.

Even with no inside info, you'd think that Freo would interested in a promising young KPF If Cerra nominated us 

And Weid is also a top 10 pick who has had development.

Edited by COVID Dan

10 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

The Weid a future first and second round picks plus our 2 second round picks should do it surely?

This assumes that:

a)  Weid is prepared to go to Freo.

b)  Freo want him.

9 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

The Weid a future first and second round picks plus our 2 second round picks should do it surely?

I think that is massively overs. We are basically swapping 4 players for 1.

Realistically its either one of:

1. Weid (or other fringe player) + future first
2. Future first + second (or future second)

The kid is good, but on present form i would say is equivalent or marginally better than someone like JJ or Rivers. Ill caveat it with that i havent watched too many Freo games, but from the media, its generally Brayshaw and Mundy that takes the plaudits from that midfield. 
 

 
2 minutes ago, CYB said:

I think that is massively overs. We are basically swapping 4 players for 1.

Realistically its either one of:

1. Weid (or other fringe player) + future first
2. Future first + second (or future second)

The kid is good, but on present form i would say is equivalent or marginally better than someone like JJ or Rivers. Ill caveat it with that i havent watched too many Freo games, but from the media, its generally Brayshaw and Mundy that takes the plaudits from that midfield. 
 

Much of Cerra's perceived value is weighted on the fact he was pick 5 a few years ago. I'd give up a 2nd rounder & our 2022 first rounder for him, but highly doubt Freo accepted when Carlton will offer more.

With that being said, if he does nominate Melbourne, their hand may be forced to accept a lower return?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Essendon

    Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 297 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 05

    Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • Thanks
    • 24 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Geelong

    There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Geelong

    I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 04

    Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • Thanks
    • 273 replies
    Demonland