Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
 

 

They were simply too good. Great defensive set up.

But our innacurate kicking for goal has again come back to haunt us. 


These women have been magnificent the last few weeks. No shame in losing today. No shortage of endeavour but lacked quality.

The vagaries of the draw caught up with us. We better get a favourable draw next year or I’ll be fuming. Just too big an ask to back up week after week against the strong teams. Adelaide are a good team but we belted them on our patch. They had a softer draw racked up the percentage and that was enough to get them top spot and the or so important home finals.

We’ve had a great year with some real talent emerging. The foundation is there. I think the one thing we are missing is a dominant forward. Any chance with could pinch Tayla Harris from Carlton I wonder? She’d straighten us up and give us a real presence inside 50. Bannon is too young and callow yet and needs more time to develop.

I’m disappointed we didn’t give a better account of ourselves today but the future is bright. The girls can hold their heads high this evening. They’ve done us proud over the journey.

Go Dees.

Gee that was disappointing.  We looked lethargic from the outset, and I reckon we had run our race before the first bounce.  

Edited by Deeoldfart

Good year Dees.

No lateral movement, no plan to create space for us, everything rushed.

Adelaide deserved the win, marking and getting the ball out of their backline. They played better pressured footy.

 

 

Edited by kev martin

Disappointing to lose but I am very proud of our girls who have given their all. I hope Daisy plays on next year.


34 minutes ago, Better days ahead said:

Our progress this season, other than a bad mid-season wobble, has been excellent. 

I don't like condescending remarks comparing the women to U15's. It's out of order imv.

I don’t think I commented on the heart of the players, but IMV, some of the skill errors are what you’d expect to see at u16s level. That’s my opinion. I will continue to support the women’s game and know that as junior development continues, so too will the elite level. At the moment, too many players have not grown up with a pathway to AFL and have been plucked from other sports. This leads to messy skills and lack of understanding of game plans. 
 

I’ll leave you with that. You seemed to be very triggered by the comment and I’m sorry you’ve taken it to heart, but if you look at some of the errors, you would see that there is merit to my comments. 

8 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

I don’t think I commented on the heart of the players, but IMV, some of the skill errors are what you’d expect to see at u16s level. That’s my opinion. I will continue to support the women’s game and know that as junior development continues, so too will the elite level. At the moment, too many players have not grown up with a pathway to AFL and have been plucked from other sports. This leads to messy skills and lack of understanding of game plans. 
 

I’ll leave you with that. You seemed to be very triggered by the comment and I’m sorry you’ve taken it to heart, but if you look at some of the errors, you would see that there is merit to my comments. 

Fair comments

Maybe I did let my frustration at the performance boil over a little.

Skills are improving every year. Rome wasn’t built in a day. I think that’s worth bearing in mind when appraising the team.

We’ll leave it at that.

Great effort to get to a Prelim.  One quarter of reasonable footy won't cut it against the best i'm afraid.

Apart from Paxmen, Hanks, Mithen, Scott and Zanker (first half or a tad less) the rest looked flat, not.enough clean possessions and took too long to decide / execute with ball in hand.

Very disorganised forward of centre and mostly just bombed it in to the hot zone similar to the match against the Pies making it relatively easy for the defence to counter.

While she tried hard, Pearce was also neautralised and / or beaten in general by Gould which had a huge impact on the girl's getting first use of the ball as often as they have in recent matches.  Cunningham appeared to compete a little better when she was in there.

Need to work on ball skills and quick movement / chains in the off season, forward craft and recruit some genuinly skilled ball users and smaller/medium forwards who can finish off the spillage.

Nice effort overall for the season but need to recognise that we were also easily beaten and were a mile off it and still a whole match away from a GF.

Have built solid foundations but much work and change required ahead to take the next step and complete the build.  Ignore the fixes and assume it will just 'happen' we will find ourselves back in the pack again in 2022.

9 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

I don’t think I commented on the heart of the players, but IMV, some of the skill errors are what you’d expect to see at u16s level. That’s my opinion. I will continue to support the women’s game and know that as junior development continues, so too will the elite level. At the moment, too many players have not grown up with a pathway to AFL and have been plucked from other sports. This leads to messy skills and lack of understanding of game plans. 
 

I’ll leave you with that. You seemed to be very triggered by the comment and I’m sorry you’ve taken it to heart, but if you look at some of the errors, you would see that there is merit to my comments. 

The one area I have seen zero improvement in is our forward line. That is season wide, not just today. I am not sure we can persist with Teagan Cunningham. Doesn’t impact the contest enough for a woman her size and is all at sea when the ball is on the deck. Bannon will be a good player, but is just a kid still learning the craft. Zanker is a great forward, but is needed elsewhere on the field. I think we need to address this area going into next season if we are to progress. Hopefully we get Petrevski back in the mix, but even she wouldn’t have made much of a difference today as we bombed into a forward line blindly

In my view, the reward for finishing 1st or 2nd is just too great in the womens' game. A week off and a prelim at home in a three week finals series. 

I'd be amazed if it isn't 1st vs 2nd in the grand final. 

The AFL really sh*t me with their pandering of favourites (both men and women). 

Dees had an absolutely ripper season and should hold their heads high.

Edited by In Harmes Way


We do lack structure up forward. We look best with either Cunningham or Zanker marking well but that has be oh so rare. Obviously Bannan is the hope here, and she shows so real promise, but is just too light at the moment to be a really target against stronger opponents.

We are kicking scores with our smalls but our next step forward needs the big forwards to win against settled defences.

The 1.9 scoreline is symptomatic of our year. We were good enough to be playing in the granny, just lacked that composure.

Well done girls. Go again next year and plenty of goal kicking practice in the off season.

Thought we lost it during the week.

Heard an interview with a player where she said, treating it like a normal game so we don't stress.

Need to be ready to play finals football, pressure, pressure , pressure. 

It was far too easy for some of the Adelaide players.

When McNamara went down we should have put Bannan out on the wing for her speed and ability to break lines.

 
4 hours ago, In Harmes Way said:

In my view, the reward for finishing 1st or 2nd is just too great in the womens' game. A week off and a prelim at home in a three week finals series. 

I'd be amazed if it isn't 1st vs 2nd in the grand final. 

The AFL really sh*t me with their pandering of favourites (both men and women). 

Dees had an absolutely ripper season and should hold their heads high.

I’m ok with the top teams being rewarded, except 4 teams finished on equal points.  The lopsided draw and the fact Adelaide racked up massive percentage against low ranked teams and finished top irks me.  I know the draws are uneven in the men’s, the shortened season magnifies this inequity in the women’s. 

I think this is a different game if played at Casey.  

The team can be proud of their season, it wasn’t their day today, but Sometimes that’s the way the cookie crumbles.
 

 

We saved our worst performance for the most important. Our inaccuracy was just terrible. But we had a good season and hope we can get back up there next year. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

    • 0 replies
  • REPORT: North Melbourne

    I suppose that I should apologise for the title of this piece, but the temptation to go with it was far too great. The memory of how North Melbourne tore Melbourne apart at the seams earlier in the season and the way in which it set the scene for the club’s demise so early in the piece has been weighing heavily upon all of us. This game was a must-win from the club’s perspective, and the team’s response was overwhelming. The 36 point win over Alastair Clarkson’s Kangaroos at the MCG on Sunday was indeed — roovenge of the highest order!

    • 4 replies
  • CASEY: Werribee

    The Casey Demons remain in contention for a VFL finals berth following a comprehensive 76-point victory over the Werribee Tigers at Whitten Oval last night. The caveat to the performance is that the once mighty Tigers have been raided of many key players and are now a shadow of the premiership-winning team from last season. The team suffered a blow before the game when veteran Tom McDonald was withdrawn for senior duty to cover for Steven May who is ill.  However, after conceding the first goal of the game, Casey was dominant from ten minutes in until the very end and despite some early errors and inaccuracy, they managed to warm to the task of dismantling the Tigers with precision, particularly after half time when the nominally home side provided them with minimal resistance.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Carlton

    The Demons return to the MCG as the the visiting team on Saturday night to take on the Blues who are under siege after 4 straight losses. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 211 replies
  • PODCAST: North Melbourne

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees glorious win over the Kangaroos at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 29 replies
  • POSTGAME: North Melbourne

    The Demons are finally back at the MCG and finally back on the winners list as they continually chipped away at a spirited Kangaroos side eventually breaking their backs and opening the floodgates to run out winners by 6 goals.

      • Love
      • Like
    • 253 replies