Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

Probably no change, but could be tempted to take Gus out for Melksham potentially.

 

 

No change

Everyone played their role well.

 

Is Weid or Brown looking at all likely? I cant honestly think of many who didnt hold up their end, Hunt maybe.


Hibberd for someone ... Jetta? Hunt?

VDB has apparently been good in the last couple of practise matches. In for Sparrow?

1 minute ago, Damo said:

Is Weid or Brown looking at all likely? I cant honestly think of many who didnt hold up their end, Hunt maybe.

Apparently Hunt played on Butler and kept him to 8 disposals.

 
2 minutes ago, bing181 said:

VDB has apparently been good in the last couple of practise matches. In for Sparrow?

No thank you.

2 minutes ago, bing181 said:

Hibberd for someone ... Jetta? Hunt?

VDB has apparently been good in the last couple of practise matches. In for Sparrow?

Sparrow was great tonight.

Vandenberg is finished.


It's a tricky one.

We had stars and lesser lights but the lesser lights all contributed at times so you'd be stiff to get dropped out of a winning side.

I'd be surprised if there is any change unless there is injury.

17 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Probably no change, but could be tempted to take Gus out for Melksham potentially.

 

 

You have got to be joking.

2 minutes ago, dl4e said:

You have got to be joking.

Happy to hear your argument for Gus staying in.

Was borderline last week, poor this week IMO. 13 touches, 0 tackles tonight.

No change for mine. 
But Melksham is a Goodwin favorite so I assume he comes in. 
Hunt had a good game, so is safe from a Hibbo return for another week. 

2 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Happy to hear your argument for Gus staying in.

Was borderline last week, poor this week IMO. 13 touches, 0 tackles tonight.

Because he is a good footballer who I think played well last week but was a little ordinary tonite, but under the circumstances with the spud bit might be acceptable. Melksham on the other hand is no where near as good as Gus and he wouldn't know what defensive pressure or tackling was. Give me Gus any day.


6 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Happy to hear your argument for Gus staying in.

Was borderline last week, poor this week IMO. 13 touches, 0 tackles tonight.

A few stuff ups but some important touches at the right time, good contests, presented well, and the Saints transition game was slow which means the wings did a nice job. 
 

Still think Jones is below Gus in the pecking order, at least in terms of a Melksham inclusion 

Just now, dl4e said:

Because he is a good footballer who I think played well last week but was a little ordinary tonite, but under the circumstances with the spud bit might be acceptable. Melksham on the other hand is no where near as good as Gus and he wouldn't know what defensive pressure or tackling was. Give me Gus any day.

I'm not a massive rap for Melksham's form over the last year or so, but I would be open to the idea of dropping Gus to help him find form. Worked a treat in 2018 after all.

Disagree he played well last week. For mine, his chasing and pressure was poor, but it went under the radar because he got a couple of 'lucky' tackles where players ran straight into him. Disposal was poor last week also. 5 clangers and 4 turnovers last week. I like Gus, but he's not in form by any stretch and from a culture point of view we have to back up the talk from the offseason about egos and not carry the popular blokes for game after game when they're not playing well.

 

1 minute ago, DeeSpencer said:

A few stuff ups but some important touches at the right time, good contests, presented well, and the Saints transition game was slow which means the wings did a nice job. 
 

Still think Jones is below Gus in the pecking order, at least in terms of a Melksham inclusion 

Jones had 14 touches, 3 tackles and a goal.

I'd have him ahead of Gus as it stands. Not by a lot, but pretty surprised with the low bar people have set for Gus these days.

10 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Jones had 14 touches, 3 tackles and a goal.

I'd have him ahead of Gus as it stands. Not by a lot, but pretty surprised with the low bar people have set for Gus these days.

Not me. Gus is a shadow of the player he was. Slow, poor disposal, hardly gets the ball.


1 minute ago, Redleg said:

Not me. Gus is a shadow of the player he was. Slow, poor disposal, hardly gets the ball.

50% kicking efficiency so far this year.

Also rated as below average for pressure acts.

29 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

It's a tricky one.

We had stars and lesser lights but the lesser lights all contributed at times so you'd be stiff to get dropped out of a winning side.

I'd be surprised if there is any change unless there is injury.

Spot on BBO. Our bottom 4-6 players are finally showing a bit and contributing to the team. All goes well and for me no changes. Stay with this side. Fix up some of our bad skill errors when under no pressure and away we go. Also I know the kid is only 18 but Jackson needs to learn to use his body more .Gets pushed around a bit easily. Small critic but he has huge upside like Kozie who can only get better.

8 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Jones had 14 touches, 3 tackles and a goal.

I'd have him ahead of Gus as it stands. Not by a lot, but pretty surprised with the low bar people have set for Gus these days.

Not too worried about the disposals. I’m surprised Jones had 3 tackles because it looked like he missed at least 5. And his goal was both a solid piece of smart running and a concern that the world was going to end before he got down to that ball. 

 
1 minute ago, Lord Nev said:

50% kicking efficiency so far this year.

Also rated as below average for pressure acts.

He’s a dreadful pressure player that’s why he’s not on ball. But given he’s on the wing he really won’t be expected to have good pressure numbers. 
 

He definitely needs to lift to really lock in his spot but I don’t think he’s at immediate risk this week 

6 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Not me. Gus is a shadow of the player he was. Slow, poor disposal, hardly gets the ball.

Worth remembering that it's not all that long ago he was in a moon boot with a serious foot injury. He missed most of the preseason, and it costs. Worth persevering with while he builds form/touch - though not a free pass either.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Hawthorn

    There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Footscray

    At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Brisbane

    The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
      • Haha
      • Like
    • 101 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Hawthorn

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Haha
    • 42 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Hawthorn

    Wayward kicking for goal, dump kicks inside 50 and some baffling umpiring all contributed to the Dees not getting out to an an early lead that may have impacted the result. At the end of the day the Demons were just not good enough and let the Hawks run away with their first win against the Demons in 7 years.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 343 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Hawthorn

    After 3 fantastic week Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award from Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Ed Langdon who round out the Top Five. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 32 replies
    Demonland