Jump to content

CHANGES: Rd 03 vs GWS

Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

 

Probably no change, but could be tempted to take Gus out for Melksham potentially.

 

 

No change

Everyone played their role well.

    • Like 5
     

    Is Weid or Brown looking at all likely? I cant honestly think of many who didnt hold up their end, Hunt maybe.

    • Shocked 2
    • Sad 1

    Hibberd for someone ... Jetta? Hunt?

    VDB has apparently been good in the last couple of practise matches. In for Sparrow?

    • Shocked 2
    • Sad 1
    1 minute ago, Damo said:

    Is Weid or Brown looking at all likely? I cant honestly think of many who didnt hold up their end, Hunt maybe.

    Apparently Hunt played on Butler and kept him to 8 disposals.

    • Like 18
    • Love 4
     
    2 minutes ago, bing181 said:

    VDB has apparently been good in the last couple of practise matches. In for Sparrow?

    No thank you.

    • Like 22
    2 minutes ago, bing181 said:

    Hibberd for someone ... Jetta? Hunt?

    VDB has apparently been good in the last couple of practise matches. In for Sparrow?

    Sparrow was great tonight.

    Vandenberg is finished.

    • Like 6

    It's a tricky one.

    We had stars and lesser lights but the lesser lights all contributed at times so you'd be stiff to get dropped out of a winning side.

    I'd be surprised if there is any change unless there is injury.

    • Like 6
    17 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

    Probably no change, but could be tempted to take Gus out for Melksham potentially.

     

     

    You have got to be joking.

    • Like 15
    • Thanks 1
    • Love 2
    • Haha 1
    • Sad 1
    • Angry 1
    2 minutes ago, dl4e said:

    You have got to be joking.

    Happy to hear your argument for Gus staying in.

    Was borderline last week, poor this week IMO. 13 touches, 0 tackles tonight.

    • Like 2

    No change for mine. 
    But Melksham is a Goodwin favorite so I assume he comes in. 
    Hunt had a good game, so is safe from a Hibbo return for another week. 

    • Sad 2
    2 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

    Happy to hear your argument for Gus staying in.

    Was borderline last week, poor this week IMO. 13 touches, 0 tackles tonight.

    Because he is a good footballer who I think played well last week but was a little ordinary tonite, but under the circumstances with the spud bit might be acceptable. Melksham on the other hand is no where near as good as Gus and he wouldn't know what defensive pressure or tackling was. Give me Gus any day.

    • Like 8

    6 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

    Happy to hear your argument for Gus staying in.

    Was borderline last week, poor this week IMO. 13 touches, 0 tackles tonight.

    A few stuff ups but some important touches at the right time, good contests, presented well, and the Saints transition game was slow which means the wings did a nice job. 
     

    Still think Jones is below Gus in the pecking order, at least in terms of a Melksham inclusion 

    • Like 6
    Just now, dl4e said:

    Because he is a good footballer who I think played well last week but was a little ordinary tonite, but under the circumstances with the spud bit might be acceptable. Melksham on the other hand is no where near as good as Gus and he wouldn't know what defensive pressure or tackling was. Give me Gus any day.

    I'm not a massive rap for Melksham's form over the last year or so, but I would be open to the idea of dropping Gus to help him find form. Worked a treat in 2018 after all.

    Disagree he played well last week. For mine, his chasing and pressure was poor, but it went under the radar because he got a couple of 'lucky' tackles where players ran straight into him. Disposal was poor last week also. 5 clangers and 4 turnovers last week. I like Gus, but he's not in form by any stretch and from a culture point of view we have to back up the talk from the offseason about egos and not carry the popular blokes for game after game when they're not playing well.

     

    • Like 3
    1 minute ago, DeeSpencer said:

    A few stuff ups but some important touches at the right time, good contests, presented well, and the Saints transition game was slow which means the wings did a nice job. 
     

    Still think Jones is below Gus in the pecking order, at least in terms of a Melksham inclusion 

    Jones had 14 touches, 3 tackles and a goal.

    I'd have him ahead of Gus as it stands. Not by a lot, but pretty surprised with the low bar people have set for Gus these days.

    • Like 2
    10 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

    Jones had 14 touches, 3 tackles and a goal.

    I'd have him ahead of Gus as it stands. Not by a lot, but pretty surprised with the low bar people have set for Gus these days.

    Not me. Gus is a shadow of the player he was. Slow, poor disposal, hardly gets the ball.

    • Like 2

    1 minute ago, Redleg said:

    Not me. Gus is a shadow of the player he was. Slow, poor disposal, hardly gets the ball.

    50% kicking efficiency so far this year.

    Also rated as below average for pressure acts.

    29 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

    It's a tricky one.

    We had stars and lesser lights but the lesser lights all contributed at times so you'd be stiff to get dropped out of a winning side.

    I'd be surprised if there is any change unless there is injury.

    Spot on BBO. Our bottom 4-6 players are finally showing a bit and contributing to the team. All goes well and for me no changes. Stay with this side. Fix up some of our bad skill errors when under no pressure and away we go. Also I know the kid is only 18 but Jackson needs to learn to use his body more .Gets pushed around a bit easily. Small critic but he has huge upside like Kozie who can only get better.

    • Like 7
    8 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

    Jones had 14 touches, 3 tackles and a goal.

    I'd have him ahead of Gus as it stands. Not by a lot, but pretty surprised with the low bar people have set for Gus these days.

    Not too worried about the disposals. I’m surprised Jones had 3 tackles because it looked like he missed at least 5. And his goal was both a solid piece of smart running and a concern that the world was going to end before he got down to that ball. 

    • Like 3
    • Haha 1
     
    1 minute ago, Lord Nev said:

    50% kicking efficiency so far this year.

    Also rated as below average for pressure acts.

    He’s a dreadful pressure player that’s why he’s not on ball. But given he’s on the wing he really won’t be expected to have good pressure numbers. 
     

    He definitely needs to lift to really lock in his spot but I don’t think he’s at immediate risk this week 

    • Like 1
    6 minutes ago, Redleg said:

    Not me. Gus is a shadow of the player he was. Slow, poor disposal, hardly gets the ball.

    Worth remembering that it's not all that long ago he was in a moon boot with a serious foot injury. He missed most of the preseason, and it costs. Worth persevering with while he builds form/touch - though not a free pass either.

    • Like 16

    Guest
    This topic is now closed to further replies.
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

        • Thanks
      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
      • 159 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: St. Kilda

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
      • 42 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

      After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 327 replies
      Demonland

    • VOTES: St. Kilda

      Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 31 replies
      Demonland
    View All