Jump to content

Featured Replies

19 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Daw adds almost nothing aside from the dreaded ‘depth’

Ah! I think thats the whole point Dubdee. Depth.

 
18 minutes ago, Demons3031 said:

I've thought long and hard before deciding to post on this and thinking through the various views. I almost posted late last  year suggesting we could look at Majak Daw when we made the move on Preuss and Majak was delisteds

A few of us also had the same thought last year, namely that he would be cheap versatile depth in all areas of the ground. ?

 

4 minutes ago, Better days ahead said:

How did he manage to play 54 games of AFL football and kick 43 goals then?

Mostly off his athleticism and potential I’d guess. 10 years on AFL list of a mostly struggling club. Averaged 5 games a season

 
7 minutes ago, John Demonic said:

A few of us also had the same thought last year, namely that he would be cheap versatile depth in all areas of the ground. ?

 

Spot on John D. I think I saw your post last year and you beat me to it. I

not hostile to the idea at all, think its quite a good experiement and could provide much needed cover atm. 

oscar would feel very stiffed though, didnt think we should of got rid of him (even if he was resident demonland whipping boy). 

heard that oscar was training at carlton, does anyone know if he got a spot? 


18 minutes ago, Better days ahead said:

Ah! I think thats the whole point Dubdee. Depth.

He is depth down back which we don’t need. Average ruck, poor fwd. 

  • Author
35 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Mature talls like McDonald, M Brown and even Tomnilson? Out talls are pretty balancing. Just need them to fire. Daw adds almost nothing aside from the dreaded ‘depth’

Why is depth 'dreaded' exactly? This is how a list works. You don't have 40+ A graders, it's just not possible. Clearly with our list situation, not just this year, but with our forthcoming OOC players there's a big picture to look at. Daw isn't even on our list yet, he's just been given a chance to show some form that might grant him a rookie spot.

Even if he manages a spot it's probably unlikely he'll play AFL level, but with Brown and Weid out, Jackson still a youngster, Petty coming off no preseason, our main insurance ruck gone, McDonald a gamble at best, Tomlinson not a forward, Lever and May both with recent injury history, OMac gone etc etc it makes sens to me to be looking at a mature swingman as very very cheap insurance.

4 minutes ago, DubDee said:

He is depth down back which we don’t need. Average ruck, poor fwd. 

Because there's a whole glut of above-average rucks just sitting round waiting for the phone to ring.

Of course he's average. Average is fine, and he's at least as good/better ruck alternative than anyone else we have.

 
4 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Demons hand AFL lifeline to Daw

Door open for discarded Roo after receiving invitation to train with Demons

I’m not sure what to make of this. My recollection of Daw’s form on comeback was that he struggled. This is virtually a second lifeline and he has also had personal issues in his life of late. Things won’t be easy for him given the physical and mental barriers he has to overcome. It’s almost a flashback to last year and Harley Bennell but at least the club is thinking outside the square. 

 

There was a game last year where he looked quite good getting to contests etc can't remember who it was against possibly Essendon? Eddie was commentating and was talking him up the whole game.

9 minutes ago, DubDee said:

He is depth down back which we don’t need. Average ruck, poor fwd. 

I think you might be overestimating out KPD depth.

MAY: good run with injuries in 2020, horrid in 2019.
LEVER: Two knee reconstructions.
SMITH: Serious groin/OP and shoulder injuries. (Yet to play a great game at senior level.)
PETTY: Zero games in 2020 and limited preseason.
TOMLINSON: Can play down back, but wouldn’t want to see him in a stopping role if May was injured.

We have next to no flexibility with someone like McDonald due to injuries to Weideman and Brown.

We have good key position stocks down back if they are all fit and firing.  However, they all have their history of significant injuries and when a couple of them are out, the shelves look pretty bare.

 


Is he actually injury prone? I thought he largely missed time due to his broken pelvis/hip after jumping from the bridge. Does he have a history of other injuries that kept him out of footy?

5 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

I think you might be overestimating out KPD depth.

MAY: good run with injuries in 2020, horrid in 2019.
LEVER: Two knee reconstructions.
SMITH: Serious groin/OP and shoulder injuries. (Yet to play a great game at senior level.)
PETTY: Zero games in 2020 and limited preseason.
TOMLINSON: Can play down back, but wouldn’t want to see him in a stopping role if May was injured.

We have next to no flexibility with someone like McDonald due to injuries to Weideman and Brown.

We have good key position stocks down back if they are all fit and firing.  However, they all have their history of significant injuries and when a couple of them are out, the shelves look pretty bare.

 

The fact Smith is 3rd on the list proves your point.

22 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Why is depth 'dreaded' exactly? This is how a list works. You don't have 40+ A graders, it's just not possible. Clearly with our list situation, not just this year, but with our forthcoming OOC players there's a big picture to look at. Daw isn't even on our list yet, he's just been given a chance to show some form that might grant him a rookie spot.

Even if he manages a spot it's probably unlikely he'll play AFL level, but with Brown and Weid out, Jackson still a youngster, Petty coming off no preseason, our main insurance ruck gone, McDonald a gamble at best, Tomlinson not a forward, Lever and May both with recent injury history, OMac gone etc etc it makes sens to me to be looking at a mature swingman as very very cheap insurance.

Thanks for the reply. 
I guess in essence I’d prefer to not take a bloke who has proven over 11 seasons not capable of playing AFL standard footy. I’d take a punt if someone else. 
thanks also for explaining how a ‘list works’. Most enlightening 

2 hours ago, nosoupforme said:

Harley Bennell   I cannot think of anyone else  BA.

who's BA?

14 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

I think you might be overestimating out KPD depth.

MAY: good run with injuries in 2020, horrid in 2019.
LEVER: Two knee reconstructions.
SMITH: Serious groin/OP and shoulder injuries. (Yet to play a great game at senior level.)
PETTY: Zero games in 2020 and limited preseason.
TOMLINSON: Can play down back, but wouldn’t want to see him in a stopping role if May was injured.

We have next to no flexibility with someone like McDonald due to injuries to Weideman and Brown.

We have good key position stocks down back if they are all fit and firing.  However, they all have their history of significant injuries and when a couple of them are out, the shelves look pretty bare.

 

You could be right. Maybe this is what they are thinking. I’d have Tomo as a lock on the backline with May and lever with petty and smith as back up. And you live with just two with hibbo and rivers


  • Author
7 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Thanks for the reply. 
I guess in essence I’d prefer to not take a bloke who has proven over 11 seasons not capable of playing AFL standard footy. I’d take a punt if someone else. 
thanks also for explaining how a ‘list works’. Most enlightening 

Mate, I get where you're coming from, I don't think anyone is legitimately excited by the prospect, but I don't know how else to put it to you other than that's just the complexities for balancing a list IMO.

He's clearly 'capable' of playing AFL footy given he's played 11 seasons. Not that I think there's a high chance of him being called upon often should he get a list spot though.

6 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Mate, I get where you're coming from, I don't think anyone is legitimately excited by the prospect, but I don't know how else to put it to you other than that's just the complexities for balancing a list IMO.

He's clearly 'capable' of playing AFL footy given he's played 11 seasons. Not that I think there's a high chance of him being called upon often should he get a list spot though.

You don’t have to argue back. I’m just putting my opinion out there 

  • Author
1 minute ago, DubDee said:

You don’t have to argue back. I’m just putting my opinion out there 

Sorry for interrupting your blog then. Proceed.

Ok Ill be brave....Welcome to MFC Majak, Hopefully u provide us with viable multi footy options and a few lfe perspectives as well. Good luck PF

Edited by picket fence


Majak if needed could be used on some tall  opposition with experience  Has played some good games and kicked multiple goals where his best was 6 goals against the Bulldogs and 4  goals in an Elimination final against Adelaide 2016.  Mind you he has finals experience.

In a game against the Dees  in 2017 he had 18 HO and 7 tackles rucking against Max so he is no slouch  and he is  good insurance to have,  Dees lost that game by 4 points and  Majak played a part in the win.  Played 18 games in 2018.and 2019 of course  had personal issues however l believe he is worth the risk .   

 

 

Good luck sir! I do hope it works out for you and the Dees. 
 

Ps Norf Heidelberg to Casey is a fair old hike! 

2 hours ago, RedLegs23 said:

Spoke to him today. Humble as always, seems pumped to get stuck in.

 

??

How did he look physically mate? Doing a pre season for North Heidelberg is stark different to AFL. 

Makes you wonder how much catching he needs to do in terms of AFL fitness.

 
39 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

who's BA?

      Bombay Airconditioning                   

I like it. Now Weideman and Brown are injured we need  mature key position player backup. Bonus is he can play either end or ruck. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies