Jump to content

Featured Replies

19 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Daw adds almost nothing aside from the dreaded ‘depth’

Ah! I think thats the whole point Dubdee. Depth.

 
18 minutes ago, Demons3031 said:

I've thought long and hard before deciding to post on this and thinking through the various views. I almost posted late last  year suggesting we could look at Majak Daw when we made the move on Preuss and Majak was delisteds

A few of us also had the same thought last year, namely that he would be cheap versatile depth in all areas of the ground. ?

 

4 minutes ago, Better days ahead said:

How did he manage to play 54 games of AFL football and kick 43 goals then?

Mostly off his athleticism and potential I’d guess. 10 years on AFL list of a mostly struggling club. Averaged 5 games a season

 
7 minutes ago, John Demonic said:

A few of us also had the same thought last year, namely that he would be cheap versatile depth in all areas of the ground. ?

 

Spot on John D. I think I saw your post last year and you beat me to it. I

not hostile to the idea at all, think its quite a good experiement and could provide much needed cover atm. 

oscar would feel very stiffed though, didnt think we should of got rid of him (even if he was resident demonland whipping boy). 

heard that oscar was training at carlton, does anyone know if he got a spot? 


18 minutes ago, Better days ahead said:

Ah! I think thats the whole point Dubdee. Depth.

He is depth down back which we don’t need. Average ruck, poor fwd. 

  • Author
35 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Mature talls like McDonald, M Brown and even Tomnilson? Out talls are pretty balancing. Just need them to fire. Daw adds almost nothing aside from the dreaded ‘depth’

Why is depth 'dreaded' exactly? This is how a list works. You don't have 40+ A graders, it's just not possible. Clearly with our list situation, not just this year, but with our forthcoming OOC players there's a big picture to look at. Daw isn't even on our list yet, he's just been given a chance to show some form that might grant him a rookie spot.

Even if he manages a spot it's probably unlikely he'll play AFL level, but with Brown and Weid out, Jackson still a youngster, Petty coming off no preseason, our main insurance ruck gone, McDonald a gamble at best, Tomlinson not a forward, Lever and May both with recent injury history, OMac gone etc etc it makes sens to me to be looking at a mature swingman as very very cheap insurance.

4 minutes ago, DubDee said:

He is depth down back which we don’t need. Average ruck, poor fwd. 

Because there's a whole glut of above-average rucks just sitting round waiting for the phone to ring.

Of course he's average. Average is fine, and he's at least as good/better ruck alternative than anyone else we have.

 
4 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Demons hand AFL lifeline to Daw

Door open for discarded Roo after receiving invitation to train with Demons

I’m not sure what to make of this. My recollection of Daw’s form on comeback was that he struggled. This is virtually a second lifeline and he has also had personal issues in his life of late. Things won’t be easy for him given the physical and mental barriers he has to overcome. It’s almost a flashback to last year and Harley Bennell but at least the club is thinking outside the square. 

 

There was a game last year where he looked quite good getting to contests etc can't remember who it was against possibly Essendon? Eddie was commentating and was talking him up the whole game.

9 minutes ago, DubDee said:

He is depth down back which we don’t need. Average ruck, poor fwd. 

I think you might be overestimating out KPD depth.

MAY: good run with injuries in 2020, horrid in 2019.
LEVER: Two knee reconstructions.
SMITH: Serious groin/OP and shoulder injuries. (Yet to play a great game at senior level.)
PETTY: Zero games in 2020 and limited preseason.
TOMLINSON: Can play down back, but wouldn’t want to see him in a stopping role if May was injured.

We have next to no flexibility with someone like McDonald due to injuries to Weideman and Brown.

We have good key position stocks down back if they are all fit and firing.  However, they all have their history of significant injuries and when a couple of them are out, the shelves look pretty bare.

 


Is he actually injury prone? I thought he largely missed time due to his broken pelvis/hip after jumping from the bridge. Does he have a history of other injuries that kept him out of footy?

5 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

I think you might be overestimating out KPD depth.

MAY: good run with injuries in 2020, horrid in 2019.
LEVER: Two knee reconstructions.
SMITH: Serious groin/OP and shoulder injuries. (Yet to play a great game at senior level.)
PETTY: Zero games in 2020 and limited preseason.
TOMLINSON: Can play down back, but wouldn’t want to see him in a stopping role if May was injured.

We have next to no flexibility with someone like McDonald due to injuries to Weideman and Brown.

We have good key position stocks down back if they are all fit and firing.  However, they all have their history of significant injuries and when a couple of them are out, the shelves look pretty bare.

 

The fact Smith is 3rd on the list proves your point.

22 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Why is depth 'dreaded' exactly? This is how a list works. You don't have 40+ A graders, it's just not possible. Clearly with our list situation, not just this year, but with our forthcoming OOC players there's a big picture to look at. Daw isn't even on our list yet, he's just been given a chance to show some form that might grant him a rookie spot.

Even if he manages a spot it's probably unlikely he'll play AFL level, but with Brown and Weid out, Jackson still a youngster, Petty coming off no preseason, our main insurance ruck gone, McDonald a gamble at best, Tomlinson not a forward, Lever and May both with recent injury history, OMac gone etc etc it makes sens to me to be looking at a mature swingman as very very cheap insurance.

Thanks for the reply. 
I guess in essence I’d prefer to not take a bloke who has proven over 11 seasons not capable of playing AFL standard footy. I’d take a punt if someone else. 
thanks also for explaining how a ‘list works’. Most enlightening 

2 hours ago, nosoupforme said:

Harley Bennell   I cannot think of anyone else  BA.

who's BA?

14 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

I think you might be overestimating out KPD depth.

MAY: good run with injuries in 2020, horrid in 2019.
LEVER: Two knee reconstructions.
SMITH: Serious groin/OP and shoulder injuries. (Yet to play a great game at senior level.)
PETTY: Zero games in 2020 and limited preseason.
TOMLINSON: Can play down back, but wouldn’t want to see him in a stopping role if May was injured.

We have next to no flexibility with someone like McDonald due to injuries to Weideman and Brown.

We have good key position stocks down back if they are all fit and firing.  However, they all have their history of significant injuries and when a couple of them are out, the shelves look pretty bare.

 

You could be right. Maybe this is what they are thinking. I’d have Tomo as a lock on the backline with May and lever with petty and smith as back up. And you live with just two with hibbo and rivers


  • Author
7 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Thanks for the reply. 
I guess in essence I’d prefer to not take a bloke who has proven over 11 seasons not capable of playing AFL standard footy. I’d take a punt if someone else. 
thanks also for explaining how a ‘list works’. Most enlightening 

Mate, I get where you're coming from, I don't think anyone is legitimately excited by the prospect, but I don't know how else to put it to you other than that's just the complexities for balancing a list IMO.

He's clearly 'capable' of playing AFL footy given he's played 11 seasons. Not that I think there's a high chance of him being called upon often should he get a list spot though.

6 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Mate, I get where you're coming from, I don't think anyone is legitimately excited by the prospect, but I don't know how else to put it to you other than that's just the complexities for balancing a list IMO.

He's clearly 'capable' of playing AFL footy given he's played 11 seasons. Not that I think there's a high chance of him being called upon often should he get a list spot though.

You don’t have to argue back. I’m just putting my opinion out there 

  • Author
1 minute ago, DubDee said:

You don’t have to argue back. I’m just putting my opinion out there 

Sorry for interrupting your blog then. Proceed.

Ok Ill be brave....Welcome to MFC Majak, Hopefully u provide us with viable multi footy options and a few lfe perspectives as well. Good luck PF

Edited by picket fence


Majak if needed could be used on some tall  opposition with experience  Has played some good games and kicked multiple goals where his best was 6 goals against the Bulldogs and 4  goals in an Elimination final against Adelaide 2016.  Mind you he has finals experience.

In a game against the Dees  in 2017 he had 18 HO and 7 tackles rucking against Max so he is no slouch  and he is  good insurance to have,  Dees lost that game by 4 points and  Majak played a part in the win.  Played 18 games in 2018.and 2019 of course  had personal issues however l believe he is worth the risk .   

 

 

Good luck sir! I do hope it works out for you and the Dees. 
 

Ps Norf Heidelberg to Casey is a fair old hike! 

2 hours ago, RedLegs23 said:

Spoke to him today. Humble as always, seems pumped to get stuck in.

 

??

How did he look physically mate? Doing a pre season for North Heidelberg is stark different to AFL. 

Makes you wonder how much catching he needs to do in terms of AFL fitness.

 
39 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

who's BA?

      Bombay Airconditioning                   

I like it. Now Weideman and Brown are injured we need  mature key position player backup. Bonus is he can play either end or ruck. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Like
    • 14 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 40 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 20 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Essendon

    Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

      • Vomit
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 231 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 723 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland