Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

2020 Player Reviews: #17 Harley Bennell

Put in a tremendous effort just to get on the field and play five games after overcoming recurring calf issues and he was on the verge of receiving a contract offer for next year when he left the club’s hub in breach of Covid19 rules and consequently was delisted.

Date of Birth: 2 October, 1992

Height: 185cm

Weight: 74kg

Games MFC 2020: 5

Career Total: 88

Goals MFC 2020: 3

Career Total: 98

 

One of the great disappointments of 2020, especially concerning the time effort and money put into his rehabilitation! Again, most disappointing!

 

An absolute bomb of an investment. Didn't play well in any games except for some glimpses in the NSW hub games.

If we did re-sign for next year, he wouldn't be in my best 22.

Good on us for supporting him but I can't see any more left field selections for a while.

Makes you sad this one. Will never fully know what happened during the season and why he couldn't get more games but it sounded like he was progressing well enough to earn another deal until, well yeah. 


Don't think we will hear anything about what's going on here one way or the other until we do....why did i say that?

Hope for Harleys sake and his family things work out 

He thought he wanted an AFL career but as it turned out that didn’t seem to be the no1 priority 

I hope his priorities are in the right order - hopefully if it’s not footy and family first  then it’s family first and anything else a distant second 

Every punter has their share of 'busts'.  We took a punt on a long-shot and it failed to deliver.  Well done Dees for giving Harley another shot in a field where he had previously excelled!  It might have been a 'masterstroke' for all parties. 

Tough times ahead for Harley and his family, I'd imagine.  Hope he manages to fight off his inner 'demons'.

 

Edited by Deeoldfart

 
On 11/13/2020 at 10:54 AM, Dee Dee said:

One of the great disappointments of 2020, especially concerning the time effort and money put into his rehabilitation! Again, most disappointing!

Given everything that has gone on in 2020, I'm hoping the decision to pick up HB is well down your list of great disappointments?

Really had my hopes up for Harley. Good luck to him and his lovely family. Keep battling and maybe with maturity and time his inner demons will give him a break.


Sad end to what looked like it could be a promising new beginning. Obviously it's a private matter but it would still be interesting to know what triggered his getting on the booze when for the most it sounds like he did everything that was expected of him and was seemingly quite well liked by his teammates.

Whatever happens with him I hope he's able to get himself right for his family, I imagine he's got a long difficult battle ahead.

(I still can't help but wonder whether things would have turned out better for him if he'd managed to have a full season is a normal AFL environment rather than the COVID bubble)

We took a punt that cost us little and ultimately delivered nothing, so we move on.

I hope Harley doesn't sit back in a few years and think what might have been if he had been able to see this season through.

1 hour ago, poita said:

We took a punt that cost us little and ultimately delivered nothing, so we move on.

I hope Harley doesn't sit back in a few years and think what might have been if he had been able to see this season through.

Cost us 50 grand and that was after he wasn't playing again. I personally wanted to give the Filth Backman a go, wished we choose him instead of Bennell. P.s not that I know 5hit from me elbow tho. And don't claim to, only my opinion. 

Wretched way to end his career. Slogged his guts out to get back to AFL level for it all to fall apart at the death. I was highly critical at the time but have more sympathy knowing the full circumstances. Hope HB can find contentment in retirement.

Credit to Burgess and his team for getting him back to fitness. Alas it didn’t work out but nothing ventured nothing gained. Didn’t cost us too much. The potential upside justified the punt imv.

Seemed to be running half paced the whole time, hard to tell whether it was effort or just the cooked calves. Great skills though


9 hours ago, Elegt said:

Seemed to be running half paced the whole time, hard to tell whether it was effort or just the cooked calves. Great skills though

I reckon it was hesitation due to mental scarring.  When he didn't have time to think of the consequences, he still showed he had his freakish ability.  Same it was only 2 or 3 times a game, rather than 20.

People are complaining about the waste of money it was - it would've been bugger all.

I'm glad the club took the punt.  Didn't work out, we move on basically unscathed.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 53 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies