Rumour only file ...

[Fat Tony 5,217]

2 hours ago, demonstone said:

Eggs over easy?   Wonder how much you'd have to shell out for him.

C’mon demonstone, that joke is œuf!

[Demonstone 22,296]

I wonder how many people had to look up the meaning of "oeuf" on GOOGle.

[Demons3031 375]

13 hours ago, demonstone said:

Eggs over easy?   Wonder how much you'd have to shell out for him.

I trust we wouldn't be accused of poaching?

[daisycutter 29,600]

40 minutes ago, Demons3031 said:

I trust we wouldn't be accused of poaching?

this thread just got all scrambled up

[Kent 2,906]

12 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

this thread just got all scrambled up

whipped into a frenzy

[Bitter but optimistic 22,218]

It’s become a yolk .

[The Chazz 4,077]

Can you guys just beat it with these egg jokes already.

[TRIGON 4,783]

14 minutes ago, The Chazz said:

Can you guys just beat it with these egg jokes already.

It's frying my brain.

[Neil Crompton 5,449]

24 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

It’s become a yolk .

I think it’s been an eggscellent discussion

Edited November 26, 2020 by Neil Crompton

[Demons3031 375]

35 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

this thread just got all scrambled up

 Wonder if ye olde Chook Fowler (Number12) is unconsciously egging people on to contribute these posts. No more from me..:)

[Turner 1,507]

1 hour ago, Neil Crompton said:

I think it’s been an eggscellent discussion

i shell not contribute to the puns

[BDA 22,713]

If we do pick him up lets hope we're not left with egg on our face

[Kent 2,906]

3 minutes ago, Better days ahead said:

If we do pick him up lets hope we're not left with egg on our face

That's a poultry contribution

[BDA 22,713]

2 minutes ago, Kent said:

That's a poultry contribution

sorry. please eggscuse my lame pun

[Bitter but optimistic 22,218]

30 minutes ago, Better days ahead said:

If we do pick him up lets hope we're not left with egg on our face

We need to hatch a plan

[trac5665 32]

is this melbournes matthew egan?

 

[Lucifers Hero 39,504]

9 minutes ago, trac5665 said:

is this melbournes matthew egan?

 

Will be a real loss.  Development of our players to be their best is our next step to being successful.

Hopefully we can get someone with a strong development background rather than a newbie who needs to develop himself and his program.  We don't have time for another coach who needs training wheels.

[BScotti 178]

so, back to footy....any rumours on DFA's who we are looking at or possibly SPP intake?

 

[deanox 9,896]

20 hours ago, Hannibal Inc. said:

It's hardly strange people are asking questions or commenting on an integral role within the MFC.

It would be ''strange'' not to.

It's strange that ppl are commentating, ie offering commentary on the situation, without actually knowledge.

Asking questions about the situation is perfectly reasonable. But again, those questions shouldn't be loaded with misinformation i.e. "why did he sign a contract when he knew his kids would be interstate?".

[Demonstone 22,296]

3 hours ago, trac5665 said:

is this melbournes matthew egan?

Missed the opportunity for Eggan there.

[BDA 22,713]

10 minutes ago, demonstone said:

Missed the opportunity for Eggan there.

Best not egg him on!

[Demonstone 22,296]

And people thought the egg puns were ova.

[buck_nekkid 5,845]

19 hours ago, Fat Tony said:

C’mon demonstone, that joke is œuf!

Only on demonland.  Tres Bon !

[Gator 17,261]

3 hours ago, deanox said:

It's strange that ppl are commentating, ie offering commentary on the situation, without actually knowledge.

Asking questions about the situation is perfectly reasonable. But again, those questions shouldn't be loaded with misinformation i.e. "why did he sign a contract when he knew his kids would be interstate?".

You might not like the line of questioning, but the discussion is hardly ''strange''.

[deanox 9,896]

6 hours ago, Hannibal Inc. said:

You might not like the line of questioning, but the discussion is hardly ''strange''.

Strange: odd; unusual or surprising; difficult to understand or explain.

 

It is strange that people think they should comment negatively on someone's motives or reasons for signing a contract when they don't know the full facts (and aren't even asking the questions to determine those facts).

 

That you don't think the word fits the sentence and would like to keep arguing about it is strange as well.