Jump to content

Featured Replies

54 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Came third in the one at the end of January in the same week he had a new baby.

So having a baby didn't effect his fitness.

 
6 minutes ago, drysdale demon said:

So having a baby didn't effect his fitness.

Lost the babe weight immediately. 

We’re too far away from being a contender to bring in a 32 year old. Could have been insurance if we were, but alas were not, so it’s a no from me. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

 

1 hour ago, Lord Nev said:

Won the time trial AGAIN at the start of preseason (and has won it every year since 2015).

Came third in the one at the end of January in the same week he had a new baby.

Good god man, you've got some intel... :)

2 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Duplicate 

A friend told me of some twin girls born at RCH. Kate and Duplicate

Agree that we are no position to bring in Smith. Wouldn't be on my wish list, but stranger things have happened!

  • Author
2 minutes ago, Engorged Onion said:

Good god man, you've got some intel... :)

Can't tell if you're serious or not... ?‍♂️ It was on the Hawks website tho.

 
1 hour ago, Moonshadow said:

And there you have it. Officially paranoid, as well as wrong

I've not initiated quoting you since you got me a ban. I've asked you twice to put me on ignore

Please do not quote me. I will no longer quote you. Honestly, how hard is it?

Let it go buddy

 

1 hour ago, Moonshadow said:

Again. Stop quoting me.

Please either put each other on ignore or you can both go. 

I don’t usually do this publicly but I’m sick of you guys all whinging to me about each other. 


12 minutes ago, Demonland said:

May I ask what caused the duplicate? Did you mistakenly hit the Quote button where the Edit button used to be (now the 3 horizontal dots above the right side of your post)?

Yep that was it. Although I’ve used the 3 dots to edit a few times, muscle memory got me on this occasion and I tapped the usual spot to edit and quoted myself.

20 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Yep that was it. Although I’ve used the 3 dots to edit a few times, muscle memory got me on this occasion and I tapped the usual spot to edit and quoted myself.

Happening to me too on occasion. I was worried there was some software or server related issue that was causing these "double posts". Glad it's just user error (muscle memory as you so eloquently put it) as a result of the new version of the software's new placement of edit and report functions.

Not sure why they made such a drastic change but there is nothing I can do about it.

4 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Yep that was it. Although I’ve used the 3 dots to edit a few times, muscle memory got me on this occasion and I tapped the usual spot to edit and quoted myself.

Better than misquoting yourself methinks

  • 2 weeks later...

From AFL.com regarding Smith.

Ideally searching for a two-year contract and it could still come at Hawthorn. But Smith admitted on RSN radio this week he wasn't 100 per cent sure what his future held. Carlton and Melbourne are among the parties having a look at the triple premiership wingman who turns 32 in December but is only 10 years into his career.

On paper I dont mind it, however the club would have to be dead certain about contending within the next 2 or so years to justify brining a player in of his age on half decent money and for a half decent pick (I doubt Hawks would let him go for anything less than a 2nd and we don't have much to spare). Smith does look like he's slowing down a bit and injury at back end of this season may be a bit concerning. We certainly could do worse, however I'd rather we spent that 2nd round pick looking at a much higher priority like a Key Forward. Pass for mine.


I prefer Smith to Polec. While he is older, I think he’s better and think he’s likely to be able to have a very long career. 

2 minutes ago, AaronDaveyChipsAndGravey said:

On paper I dont mind it, however the club would have to be dead certain about contending within the next 2 or so years to justify brining a player in of his age on half decent money and for a half decent pick (I doubt Hawks would let him go for anything less than a 2nd and we don't have much to spare). Smith does look like he's slowing down a bit and injury at back end of this season may be a bit concerning. We certainly could do worse, however I'd rather we spent that 2nd round pick looking at a much higher priority like a Key Forward. Pass for mine.

Smith is a free agent. 

Just now, Fat Tony said:

Smith is a free agent. 

My mistake ! Thanks for that. If we can get him in for a reasonable price I wouldnt mind it in that case.

3 minutes ago, AaronDaveyChipsAndGravey said:

On paper I dont mind it, however the club would have to be dead certain about contending within the next 2 or so years to justify brining a player in of his age on half decent money and for a half decent pick (I doubt Hawks would let him go for anything less than a 2nd and we don't have much to spare). Smith does look like he's slowing down a bit and injury at back end of this season may be a bit concerning. We certainly could do worse, however I'd rather we spent that 2nd round pick looking at a much higher priority like a Key Forward. Pass for mine.

hawks won't ask for a 2nd rounder for a 32 yr old

17 minutes ago, Dr.D said:

hawks won't ask for a 2nd rounder for a 32 yr old

His a UFA. No pick required. 


His Leadership will be more valuable than his output on the field, of which he will still offer a lot

1 hour ago, BW511 said:

His Leadership will be more valuable than his output on the field, of which he will still offer a lot

I don’t think I could handle more leadership from a 30+ Hawk on a superannuation contract.

28 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

I don’t think I could handle more leadership from a 30+ Hawk on a superannuation contract.

Understandable, but he doesn’t seem quite so invested in himself as Lewis was. 
 

Long and accurate kick with a bit of pace - hard to argue against?

 

 
32 minutes ago, BW511 said:

Understandable, but he doesn’t seem quite so invested in himself as Lewis was. 
 

Long and accurate kick with a bit of pace - hard to argue against?

 

I’d be worried his pace might not last at 32 and length was always the strong point of his kicking. He’d get some long kicks in quickly but I wouldn’t expect him to hit many short leads

Too old. Injuries will hit soon. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • WHAT’S NEXT? by The Oracle

    What’s next for a beleagured Melbourne Football Club down in form and confidence, facing  intense criticism and disapproval over some underwhelming recent performances and in the midst of a four game losing streak? Why, it’s Adelaide which boasts the best percentage in the AFL and has won six of its last seven games. The Crows are hot and not only that, the game is at the Adelaide Oval; yet another away fixture and the third in a row at a venue outside of Victoria. One of the problems the Demons have these days is that they rarely have the luxury of true home ground advantage, something they have enjoyed just once since mid April. 

      • Thanks
    • 2 replies
  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 189 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 231 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 41 replies