NON MFC: Round 17

[Demonland 73,140]

Dogs already up 2 %

[Demonland 73,140]

Someone tag the Bont.

[hardtack 10,627]

16 minutes ago, Demonland said:

I think we need to forget about the assist from the Hawks.

Over to you Fremantle.

I’ve put in a request with the Suns to do the Pies tomorrow.

[Demonland 73,140]

How can we expect Hawks to win when then can't take an easy mark.

[pitmaster 3,578]

Strewth hawks are  terrible.

[Demonland 73,140]

Ok I'm done. I can't put myself through this.

[Stevienic23 1,183]

I'm done. Hope we play Hawthorn twice next year

[gs77 4,445]

This is getting ugly.

[DeeZee 7,445]

No chance Bulldogs will lose this or the next.

They are on a mission 

[BDA 22,880]

This is turning ugly. doggies will get a major % boost by the looks of it.

[gs77 4,445]

Just now, Stevienic23 said:

I'm done. Hope we play Hawthorn twice next year

I'm sure we won't. We'll play WCE, Lions, Freo and Port twice, with our home games against Freo and Port in NT.

[titan_uranus 25,043]

Dogs' percentage currently sitting at 103.4%, so it's already up 3.1%.

If Hawthorn doesn't show up at some point and at least stem the bleeding, we may not have a choice but to either belt Essendon or to rely on the St Kilda or Collingwood pathways.

[leave it to deever 17,517]

Didnt think Hawthorn would lose.

My money is on the saints to lose and we beat the dons by enough to see us miss finals by about.01 of a percent.

Nothing different. 

[Mazer Rackham 14,971]

1 hour ago, bingers said:

Umpires never seem to pay 'running too far' frees.

They paid quite a few marks, some for shots on goal, that went about 6 metres

[Stevienic23 1,183]

4 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

Dogs' percentage currently sitting at 103.4%, so it's already up 3.1%.

If Hawthorn doesn't show up at some point and at least stem the bleeding, we may not have a choice but to either belt Essendon or to rely on the St Kilda or Collingwood pathways.

We deserve this for not taking care of business on our end

[Tom Dyson 1,633]

Does dogs % matter for us?

[Bring-Back-Powell 14,939]

Just now, Tom Dyson said:

Does dogs % matter for us?

My oath it does.

And they’ll overtake us by half time at this rate.

[gs77 4,445]

Just now, Tom Dyson said:

Does dogs % matter for us?

Yes, even if we win next week and they lose, they could still end up ahead of us on % with us both on 9 wins.

[gs77 4,445]

2 minutes ago, gs77 said:

Yes, even if we win next week and they lose, they could still end up ahead of us on % with us both on 9 wins.

Our %ge 106.2, theirs was 100.3 before this game, but is now up to 104.4 on live ladder. If they keep this up we'll need a solid margin next week to get over them.

Edited September 13, 2020 by gs77

[Tom Dyson 1,633]

1 minute ago, gs77 said:

Our %ge 106.2, theirs was 100.3 before this game, but is now up to 104.4 on live ladder. If they keep this up we'll need a solid margin next week to get over them.

If Freo help us out, it will hopefully go down as well so just need Hogan to have a day out next week. 

[Bring-Back-Powell 14,939]

This is one of the worst performances of any side this year thus far - by Hawthron.

[Demonland 73,140]

3 minutes ago, gs77 said:

Our %ge 106.2, theirs was 100.3 before this game, but is now up to 104.4 on live ladder. If they keep this up we'll need a solid margin next week to get over them.

Not to mention them losing to Freo.

Freo are much better than the Hawks and won't just roll over but the Bulldogs also don't drop games to lowly teams.

[DubDee 26,117]

I’m back to hoping the giants beat the Saints. Giants should bring some good players players in 

[Ethan Tremblay 30,966]

Hawks are Melbourne under Neeld bad. 

[Graeme Yeats' Mullet 6,778]

3 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Hawks are Melbourne under Neeld bad. 

Was just thinking the same thing

It's [censored] deplorable