Jump to content

Featured Replies

11 hours ago, Tony Tea said:

Michael Voss?

One of the best footballers I've seen and an inspiring captain. He was thrown into coaching unprepared but has done a bit since. He would certainly be worth a close look.

 

If we miss finals next year Goodwin will be sacked 100%.

We need a smart and crafty coach if this happens as Goodwin has been outcoached times and again on game day .

Not an untried rookie , it has to be someone like Clarkson or Lyon

Sadly boys and girls I think we are stuck with Goodloss for another season as we cannot afford to pay him out and there are too many in control who made the decision to give him an extra three years. Think mid 2021 he goes and a new coach for season 2022. 

 
3 minutes ago, old dee said:

Sadly boys and girls I think we are stuck with Goodloss for another season as we cannot afford to pay him out and there are too many in control who made the decision to give him an extra three years. Think mid 2021 he goes and a new coach for season 2022. 

I don't think so, OD. If we don't make finals, he's gone.

You can't set expectations of finals or bust at the start of 2020 from a board POV and then back in the coach when the team fails to get there.

We've had a perfectly healthy list for the majority of the year and we haven't got there. He's done. 

People are too worried about economics here. We'll be fine, as long as we get the next coach right.

Edited by A F

I know there's a lot of talk here of it being too expensive to get rid of Goody, and that may be true, but really the cost of NOT removing him, and instead waiting 2 more years (where some of our very expensive recruits will be out of their prime), then waiting the normal transition period for this to gel with a new coach, is far greater. Plus we could lose some in the next year or two (some should go, spuds like ANB, OMac, Wagner etc), but some might leave for success and more money. Who could blame them? So we're at a real risk of missing our very narrow window, if that window in fact exists.

As for the answer? Geez I've never like Lyon's gameplan (although at least he seemed to have one), so maybe Clarko if he was actually free, but I worry about the false confidence that long time successful coaches will strike lightning at a new club, such as Sheedy. 

We need someone ruthless, no BS. Won't tolerate our [censored]*poor culture. Yze is junior sure but he'd be worth a look. At least he might care about our jumper.


1 minute ago, A F said:

I don't think so, OD. If we don't make finals, he's gone.

You can't set expectations of finals or bust at the start of 2020 from a board POV and then back in the coach when the team fails to get there.

We've had a perfectly healthy list for the majority of the year and we haven't got there. He's done. 

People are too worried about economics here. We'll be fine, as long as we get the next coach right.

100% 

The expectations were clearly made, and no wriggle room afforded. Finals every year. No finals this year, he fails and we move on.

The cost of a lost window, lost talent who want success/money etc, as well as members who leave in droves if he stays... is too high.

No finals, Goody goes.

5 minutes ago, A F said:

I don't think so, OD. If we don't make finals, he's gone.

You can't set expectations of finals or bust at the start of 2020 from a board POV and then back in the coach when the team fails to get there.

We've had a perfectly healthy list for the majority of the year and we haven't got there. He's done. 

People are too worried about economics here. We'll be fine, as long as we get the next coach right.

The other problem af is people are over estimating the quality of the list. It is a mid level team if things go our way. We have a large number of average players. 

Edited by old dee

1 minute ago, old dee said:

The other problem af is people are over estimating the quality of the list. It is a mid level team if things go our way. We have a large number of average players. 

I reckon you'll find most of the league rates our midfield, but most of the league finds us very easy to coach against. 

 
37 minutes ago, A F said:

Simpson, Clarkson, Beveridge of the experienced coaches.

I like Yze as the sentiment option, but have no real idea if he can coach.

Luke Beveridge was approached when Roos was looking for a succession plan you know. He declined as he wanted to be his own man and not spend a year learning the Roos way in order to get continuity. Dew said no and with a time pressure Goodwin got the gig and as an assistant offered some attacking flare to the Roos based defence strategy. Ironically we haven't got the continuity from the Roos mantra as Goodwin has moved in a different direction and slowly dismantled that in successive years and now we are 18th in the league for tackles.

Bevo is now a premiership coach and has rebuilt his list on the fly and they have a red hot go. Goodwin has shown what he has got and the trend has been downward. Unless he has some new tricks or a sudden change of heart, the slide will continue. A new coach takes time to change up  or another year of same old Goodwin style tells me that 2021 expectation should not be too high.

Also consider that Jones, Jetta, T Mac and Melk have all fallen a long way from 2018 and have not been adequately replaced and are either gone or past their best. Sacking Goodwin will not fix things in the short term.

Edited by Older demon

1 hour ago, DubDee said:

Has won zero premierships. 

If he is so great, why would Freo sack him? He was gifted teams ready to win a flag and failed twice. Although he did get them to GFs. We are not near as good or mature as saints and Freo were when he took over

Freo sacked him because they needed to re-build and he wasn't suited to re-building a team. 

we're ready to challenge but our coach isn't capable, in a very similar stage to St Kilda and Fremantle when he took over. 


I agree we are stuck with Goodwin for at least another year, we need to get good assistance around him.  Seems Goodwin doesn't work that well with assistant coached we had a good line up, in 2018 most of them have gone.

Get Neitz as our forward coach, we need someone to take Weiderman and Jackson under their wing to teach them how to be a key forward.

Just now, Older demon said:

Luke Beveridge was approached when Roos was looking for a succession plan you know. He declined as he wanted to be his own man and not spend a year learning the Roos way in order to get continuity. Dew said no and with a time pressure Goodwin got the gi and as an assistant offered some attacking flare to the Roos based defence strategy.g. Ironically we haven't got the continuity from the Roos mantra as Goodwin has slowly dismantled that in successive years and now we are 18th in the league for tackles.

Bevo is now a premiership coach and has rebuilt his list on the fly and they have a red hot go. Goodwin has shown what he has got and the trend has been downward. Unless he has some new tricks or a sudden change of heart the slide will continue. A new coach takes time to change up  or another year of same old tells me that 2021 expectation should not be too high. Also consider that Jones, Jetta, T Mac and Melk have all fallen a long way from 2018 and have not been adequately replaced. Sacking Goodwin will not fix things in the short term.

I was just putting out who I'd like, not who I think we'll get. I know the Beveridge's and I'm not sure we'd get Luke.

1 minute ago, A F said:

I was just putting out who I'd like, not who I think we'll get. I know the Beveridge's and I'm not sure we'd get Luke.

I know Bevo from his days at St Bedes and told him at the time I wish he would go to Melbourne. He laughed and said he would see. I think he is Footscray's coach for as long as he likes and has built HIS team. Why would he go to MFC and start from scratch? Not going to happen.

4 minutes ago, A F said:

I reckon you'll find most of the league rates our midfield, but most of the league finds us very easy to coach against. 

We have one KPF who at present is an average KPF. No good small forwards, a couple of handy forward flankers and that is it. That forward line will no kick winning scores against the better teams in the competition, in fact it struggles to kick winning scores against the weaker sides. We have a multitude of players who fall into the VFL standard talents group and a bigger number of average talents. The top ten Players cannot continually cover up that lack of talent.  

5 minutes ago, old dee said:

We have one KPF who at present is an average KPF. No good small forwards, a couple of handy forward flankers and that is it. That forward line will no kick winning scores against the better teams in the competition, in fact it struggles to kick winning scores against the weaker sides. We have a multitude of players who fall into the VFL standard talents group and a bigger number of average talents. The top ten Players cannot continually cover up that lack of talent.  

I know he's only a kid with a handfull of games but I reckon the loss of Jackson really unbalanced our forward set up. 

Tall athletic and mobile .The type who defenders must pay attention to. Took a lot of pressure off Weid.


6 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

I know he's only a kid with a handfull of games but I reckon the loss of Jackson really unbalanced our forward set up. 

Tall athletic and mobile .The type who defenders must pay attention to. Took a lot of pressure off Weid.

As you say he is only a kid, in my look at the list I have left off this years recruits as it is too early to tell. Early indications are that two of the three show promise. 

I wouldn’t mind John Longmire. 

If we are going to change, Clarkson would be the top pick. Otherwise I think Brad Scott is a shrewd coach.

1 hour ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

One of the best footballers I've seen and an inspiring captain. He was thrown into coaching unprepared but has done a bit since. He would certainly be worth a close look.

He is a true leader and got to watch him live for a couple of years in the Lions dominance of the comp.

Would run through a brick wall.

He's hopefully learnt a fair bit in his coaching career now.

If we look at Voss, you'd have to look at Mitchell and possibly Yze.

I'd worry about Yze getting sucked back into our clubs existing culture though.

1st choice would be Clarkson by a mile.

Not keen on Lyon.


1 hour ago, drdrake said:

I agree we are stuck with Goodwin for at least another year, we need to get good assistance around him.  Seems Goodwin doesn't work that well with assistant coached we had a good line up, in 2018 most of them have gone.

You mean like McCartney, Rawlings or Jennings? What can't people see here.

Re coach, it needs to come from imo: Clarkson, Longmire, R Lyon, B Scott, Fagan, C Scott, Beveridge, Hardwick, Hinkley, Simpson, Ratten. I'm not sold on Worsfold. We need someone with a bit of inspiration and drive. Of course many of those we just won't get but that's the path I think we need to take, we can't afford any more rookies, not until we are on our feet properly. Surround one of the above with Solomon, Voss, Mitchell, Hodge or Hayes.

I also think Mahoney should go along with Goodwin and I'm still not sold on Taylor either.

Bit of a mess when you actually look over the whole club tbh.

Edited by SFebes

1 hour ago, RedButMostlyBlue said:

I know there's a lot of talk here of it being too expensive to get rid of Goody, and that may be true, but really the cost of NOT removing him, and instead waiting 2 more years (where some of our very expensive recruits will be out of their prime), then waiting the normal transition period for this to gel with a new coach, is far greater. Plus we could lose some in the next year or two (some should go, spuds like ANB, OMac, Wagner etc), but some might leave for success and more money. Who could blame them? So we're at a real risk of missing our very narrow window, if that window in fact exists.

As for the answer? Geez I've never like Lyon's gameplan (although at least he seemed to have one), so maybe Clarko if he was actually free, but I worry about the false confidence that long time successful coaches will strike lightning at a new club, such as Sheedy. 

We need someone ruthless, no BS. Won't tolerate our [censored]*poor culture. Yze is junior sure but he'd be worth a look. At least he might care about our jumper.

I think someone here mentioned we'd found some mystery money down the back of the couch and were otherwise in sound financial shape to the extent we could afford to pay him out.

Who i'd like but aint going to happen

1. Longmire

2. Beverage

3. Hardwick

4. Dew

5. Longmuir

 
20 minutes ago, SFebes said:

You mean like McCartney, Rawlings or Jennings? What can't people see here.

 

Yes and that was my second point, Goodwin doesn't seem to work well with his assistants, the good ones leave.  Your head coach is the figure head, you need a team of good assistance around him.  If a coach pushes them away it is a big issue.  

13 hours ago, P-man said:

I have to continually remind myself that Troy Chaplin is part of our coaching staff.

Troy Chaplin ffs.

giphy.gif

His pre game dackings really get the boys up n about.

Edited by John Demonic


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 86 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 316 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies