Jump to content

CHANGES: Rd 14 vs St Kilda

titan_uranus
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, titan_uranus said:

The three keys IMO are getting on top in the middle, being efficient in our forward 50, and pressuring them in our back half before they get out.

If they get on top in the middle, we won't score enough to win.

If we waste our chances forward of centre and turn it over, they'll destroy us on transition.

And if we don't pressure them from their kick ins, they'll waltz out of the backline like the Dogs.

We're capable of winning this, but in all likelihood we won't be able to do all of this at once.

Yep

Our best is shown when we get the game played on our terms.  So we need to do most things right and hope the Saints are not at their absolute best.  Ratten is a good coach though so they will be well prepared.

The win can happen of course but when we've been up against the testing material this season we've fallen short. 

But you never know,  losing the way we did yesterday will sting so the group (coaches included) will at least know what we need to do.  As LH mentioned,  we need to be ready and totally switched on.

 
14 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

Hunt, Bedford and Jones all in, but Harmes out. Who's taking Harmes' rotation in the back half?

If you're going to drop Harmes and Spargo, I'd suggest only two of these three forwards come in, and Rivers gets the other spot.

Fair call. Might leave Harmes in that case although could equally have Jones/Brayshaw rotate in the back half.

Such was the nature of the performance I’m even flirting with the idea of playing Harmes forward. Our smalls let us down badly.

We always have problems against sides that play a run and carry with transition movement Eagles, Saints Dogs yesterday etc lets have a look at our kickouts always to the left either a short kick then down the line or long bomb from the goal square nothing changes, lack of leadership from the midfield how many times the dogs just took it away while on the run not one of the midfield try to change anything, forwards always behind their opponent so if a goes in from a contest we are always caught short.

If you look at the North game our goal kickers were running in a straight line yesterday Fritsch running in an arc same with Oliver no set routine.

Goodwin well is it time to part ways not sure but gee it makes it hard to defend him you could see what was happening in the third but bugger all changes the saints play they same way as the dogs so I hope it does not end up with same result.

 

 

Speed on the outside is critical against the saints and I'm starting to think the Baker idea could be worth thinking about. We seem to do a lot better when there is bit more run and carry as shown from Oliver recently, the quick hack kick and down the throat method isn't doing anything right now. 

In   Joel Smith         Out     T Mac
In   Toby Bedford     Out   Charlie Spargo
In   Max Gawn          Out    Preusss
In   Trent Rivers        Out   Harmes
In    Harley bennell    Out  Sparrow

Lucky -  Hibberd, Hanna, AVB, Melksham
 

Jones not ready if he hurt his quad.   Joel Smith to play forward where he belongs.

 

B        Jay Lockhart            Steven  May            Michael Hibberd
HB     Trent Rivers              Adam Tomlinson     Jake Lever
C         Ed Langdon              Clayton Oliver         Harley Bennell
HF      Bayley Fritsch           Joel Smith              Christian Petracca
F         Toby Bedford           Sam Weideman       Kysaiah Pickett
R         Max Gawn                Angus Brayshaw     Jack VIney

Bench   Christian Salem    Mitch Hannan    Aaron Vandenberg   Jake Melksham
 

Edited by Pickett2Jackson


Broken record, but I'd be after some more leg speed and class, especially around half forward and on the opposite wing to Langdon.

Out: Preuss, Sparrow, Vandenberg, Hannan

In: Gawn, Hunt, Rivers, either Bennell or Baker

Harmes to take Sparrow's role and Rivers to play half back.

    • Like 1
    20 hours ago, Jaded said:

    Melksham has been woeful in all but one game this year. He keeps getting games seemingly because he’s mate with Goodwin. He needs to be dropped. If it’s good enough for Hibbo, Jones and Jetta it’s good enough for Melksham. 

    I understand the frustration, but at least he typically kicks a goal or two and creates a couple. Hannan has less impact and gives nothing in his poor games!

    Pickett also needs a week off, not hitting the scoreboard or creating goals.

    Just finished watching the Saints game. Let's hope for rain, mud.

    • Sad 1
     

    Preuss Out 
    Gawn In

    Sparrow Out
    Rivers In (give Harmes minutes in the middle and up forward)

    Other possible ins would be Oskar Baker for Sparrow and Hunt for Hannan perhaps?

    Melksham is a bit like Fritta they keep bobbing up for cheap goals here and there but both I feel aren't fulfilling their roles. Both should be aiming for 15+ possies and 1-2 goals a game.


    25 minutes ago, D4Life said:

    I understand the frustration, but at least he typically kicks a goal or two and creates a couple. Hannan has less impact and gives nothing in his poor games!

    Pickett also needs a week off, not hitting the scoreboard or creating goals.

    Pickett is a small flea who is overrated. Hannan has big potential and kicks goals. Give Hannan a chance.

    Edited by Coq au vin

    Just now, Coq au vin said:

    They lost by 2 points to the Bears. We’ll lose to them by 56.

    We lost to the Lions by 4 points, arguably matched them better across the game than the Saints did who should've been down by 30+ points at 3 quarter time.

    I watched Saints v Lions. Saints are really good. Demons ... no nope. They'll run us off the park.

    • Like 2
    • Author
    9 minutes ago, Coq au vin said:

    They lost by 2 points to the Bears. We’ll lose to them by 56.

    There are a number of reasons why we are likely to lose to St Kilda.

    This sort of analysis isn't one of them.

    We lost to Brisbane by 4 points. Like St Kilda, we had fewer scoring shots but were relatively more accurate and kept ourselves in the game. Like today, if Brisbane had kicked straight, the margin would have been bigger.

    • Like 1

    8 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

    There are a number of reasons why we are likely to lose to St Kilda.

    This sort of analysis isn't one of them.

    We lost to Brisbane by 4 points. Like St Kilda, we had fewer scoring shots but were relatively more accurate and kept ourselves in the game. Like today, if Brisbane had kicked straight, the margin would have been bigger.

    Like Adelaide we are a poor team. Mr tight bottie. St Kilda recruited well in the off season. We got Brown who has played one game, Tomlinson who is bog ordinary, Pickett who is a tiny tadpole, Jackson who is injured and won’t be back this year And Bennell who is skilled but a pale shadow of his former self. How’s the [censored] isis mr constipation haemorrhoid? By the way I cooked mr Fowler into coq au vin.

    Edited by Coq au vin

    23 hours ago, big_red_fire_engine said:

    In Gawn: Out Tmac

    In Rivers Out Sparrow

    In: Bedford Out Hannan

    In Hunt Out Melksham

     

    Adjusting this based on todays scratch and an acceptance Melksham through all his flaws had enough score involvements and 1.3 could have daily been 4 straight

    In Gawn, Out TMac

    In Rivers Out Sparrow (Harmes takes Sparrows role)

    In Hunt Out Hannan

    In Baker Out AVB ( we need to promote speed and we if Baker is up to it now fit)

     

    • Author
    5 minutes ago, Coq au vin said:

    Like Adelaide we are a poor team.

    If this is your best attempt at analysis, I'd consider trying to follow a different sport.

    • Haha 2
    15 minutes ago, Coq au vin said:

    Like Adelaide we are a poor team.

    No one can compare to Adelaide this year, they are a category unto themselves. 

    Here are some actual reasons that you can use on why we may lose to the Saints:

    - Similar to the dogs they seem to have good outside run, which we have been vulnerable to

    - when their pressure game is on they are always in it up to their eyeballs, when pressure comes on us we have wilted

    - King could have a day out against us if our midfield don't put enough pressure on up the ground

    - Ratten is a very good coach, and Goodwin was most definitely out-coached against Bevo this week

    - We always seem to lose to the Saints

    Edited by Pates

    7 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

    If this is your best attempt at analysis, I'd consider trying to follow a different sport.

    Like teasing you? My favourite sport. How’s the rectal stenosis?

    Edited by Coq au vin


    11 minutes ago, big_red_fire_engine said:

    Adjusting this based on todays scratch and an acceptance Melksham through all his flaws had enough score involvements and 1.3 could have daily been 4 straight

    In Gawn, Out TMac

    In Rivers Out Sparrow (Harmes takes Sparrows role)

    In Hunt Out Hannan

    In Baker Out AVB ( we need to promote speed and we if Baker is up to it now fit)

     

    Bold choice going for a Preuss and Gawn combo, not against it either. The question comes do we play Weid further up the ground as the CHF and Preuss deep and give him a simple instruction of "if you can't mark it bring it to ground" then have Kozzie and Spargo darting around at his feet.

    Is Neal-Bullen available yet? I know he’s no world beater, but a runner playing forward who can clog up outlets seems pretty obvious given how easy the doggies moved the ball yesterday.

    I assume he has one more game left to serve?

    • Author
    16 minutes ago, Coq au vin said:

    Like Adelaide we are a poor team. Mr tight bottie. St Kilda recruited well in the off season. We got Brown who has played one game, Tomlinson who is bog ordinary, Pickett who is a tiny tadpole, Jackson who is injured and won’t be back this year And Bennell who is skilled but a pale shadow of his former self. How’s the [censored] isis mr constipation haemorrhoid? By the way I cooked mr Fowler into coq au vin.

    5 minutes ago, Coq au vin said:

    Like teasing you? My favourite sport. How’s the rectal stenosis?

    Excellent stuff. Can't stop laughing.

    As to your "analysis" of the recruiting: what has any of that got to do with your horrendous argument that we're like Adelaide?

     

    I’d like to see us retain Preuss for next week. If we are going on form he stays in to play alongside Max to combat Ryder and Marshall. Looks a lot more agile than T Mac at the moment. Can we make it work? 

    In : Gawn, Hunt

    Out: T Mac, Sparrow 

    15 minutes ago, big_red_fire_engine said:

    Adjusting this based on todays scratch and an acceptance Melksham through all his flaws had enough score involvements and 1.3 could have daily been 4 straight

    In Gawn, Out TMac

    In Rivers Out Sparrow (Harmes takes Sparrows role)

    In Hunt Out Hannan

    In Baker Out AVB ( we need to promote speed and we if Baker is up to it now fit)

     

    Having read the report from the MFC website, the changes you suggest here are all very likely. It does not sound like Bedford did much today, but has some form, so maybe he replaces Pickett. The reports were highly complimentary of Wagner, so would not be surprised to see him in, although I never think he adds much at senior level and has consistently underperformed. 


    Guest
    This topic is now closed to further replies.
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • CASEY: Collingwood

      It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
      The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
      Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • 2 replies
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 13

      Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

        • Shocked
      • 156 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Collingwood

      Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • 430 replies
      Demonland
    View All