Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author
41 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Easily in our most talent 25 or so players. If Pickett is as raw as he's likely to be then Chandler will be ahead of him as the most suited to a pressure forward role. His tackling was very good on debut, in many ways he's the incumbent in the role.

tell us more? it's hard to judge on one game (in which he was unfortunate to cop an injury) but curious to know more as to why you rate in best possible squad

big wrap!

 
1 hour ago, DeeSpencer said:

Easily in our most talent 25 or so players. If Pickett is as raw as he's likely to be then Chandler will be ahead of him as the most suited to a pressure forward role. His tackling was very good on debut, in many ways he's the incumbent in the role.

Why would Pickett be "raw" ?  He's not new to the code.  His skills look exquisite and I'm sure he's had a footy in his hand since he was a toddler.

His endurance may not be up to scratch and he may serve an apprenticeship at Casey, but why is he likely to be raw ?

42 minutes ago, ProDee said:

Why would Pickett be "raw" ?  He's not new to the code.  His skills look exquisite and I'm sure he's had a footy in his hand since he was a toddler.

His endurance may not be up to scratch and he may serve an apprenticeship at Casey, but why is he likely to be raw ?

Poor choice of adjective, substitute whatever you like that means lack of endurance, lack familiarity with the game plan, weighing 71kgs and possible lack of confidence to bring the same crash and bash against AFL players that he does to kids. 

 
1 hour ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

tell us more? it's hard to judge on one game (in which he was unfortunate to cop an injury) but curious to know more as to why you rate in best possible squad

big wrap!

Gets to the right spots, can win the ball, is quick with his skills and has the right kind of quick agility to tackle or evade tackles.

He didn’t get much of the ball on debut (in an awful team effort) but his tackling was easily sharp enough. 

1 hour ago, DeeSpencer said:

Poor choice of adjective, substitute whatever you like that means lack of endurance, lack familiarity with the game plan, weighing 71kgs and possible lack of confidence to bring the same crash and bash against AFL players that he does to kids. 

You mean a first year player. 

Some adapt quicker than others. 

We'll see. 


2 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

Gets to the right spots, can win the ball, is quick with his skills and has the right kind of quick agility to tackle or evade tackles.

He didn’t get much of the ball on debut (in an awful team effort) but his tackling was easily sharp enough. 

Funny how we see things differently. I thought he looked out of his depth at AFL level.

Think Pickett will quickly pass him...probably by the first game.

7 hours ago, Fifty-5 said:

You'd benefit from reading the training reports and the groups players are training with.

Petty with the forwards, Harmes with the backs, Petracca with the mids.

OK NEW TEAM

B: JETTA, MAY, SALEM

HB: HARMES, LEVER, HIBBERD

? LANGON, OLIVER, TOMLINSON

HF: MELKSHAM, T.MCDONALD, PETRACCA

F: PICKETT, WEIDEMAN, FRITSCH

FOLL: GAWN, VINEY, BRAYSHAW

IC: JONES, PETTY, JACKSON, BENNELL

 

NEXT 22

B: LOCKHART, O.MCDONALD, HORE

HB: RIVERS, SMITH, KOLODJASHNIJ

? VANDENBERG, SPARROW, BAKER

HF: HANNAN, BROWN, NEAL-BULLEN

F: HUNT, BRADTKE, C.WAGNER

FOLL: PREUSS, JORDON, SPARGO

IC: J.WAGNER, DUNKLEY, NEITSCHKE, BEDFORD, CHANDLER

 

With Chandler I'm sure the club would tell him to train hard so he can play round 1 but reality is Pickett is the front runner for the small forward spot.

When picking a team we seem to aim for 7 defenders and 7 forwards (3 tall, 4 medium/small). Obviously Gawn plays and I reckon the right mix of midfielders would be 4 inside, 3 outside. On that basis...

Best 22 (assuming no injuries whatsoever) 

Defenders: May, Lever, O.McDonald, Hibberd, Jetta, Salem, Kolodashnij

Midfielders: Gawn (r), Viney, Harmes, Brayshaw, Oliver, Bennell, Tomlinson, Langdon

Forwards: T.McDonald, Weideman, Petty, Melksham, Petracca, Fritsch, Pickett

Edited by Gouga

 

I think this pre season is going to be the most competitive we will have seen for many a long year. Assuming our squad is fit, the competition for places in the team will be immense. The selectors must be wetting themselves with excitement, not only at having to choose, but also knowing that if they make a mistake with a player, there are at least 2 players to take his place. Our list is finally looking strong. So if all are fit and firing (in other words a fantasy 22), I’d go for:

Jetta OMac Lever

Smith May Hibbert

Langdon Oliver Salem

AVB TMac Petracca

Pickett Weid Fritsch

Gawn Bradshaw Viney

INT Harmes Tomlinson Petty Bennell

Apologies to: Melksham Jones Hannah Hunt Hore Pruess KK Sparrow Dunkley Baker Lockhart Jackson , But all I can say is perform so the selectors have to pick you.

Posters will have other thoughts, but I’d be happy seeing the above selections on the field at some stage during the season, particularly our grand final team.

Edited by Neil Crompton

On 11/29/2019 at 11:31 PM, whatwhatsaywhat said:

best 22?
B: Jetta - May - Hibberd
HB: Salem - Lever - Harmes
? Langdon - Brayshaw - Tomlinson
HF: Petracca - T Mac - Hannan
F: Fritsch - Weideman - Melksham
Foll: Gawn - Oliver - Viney
I/c: Jones - vandenBerg - Petty - Bennell

next 22?
B:  Lockhart - O Mac - J Smith
HB: Jordon - Hore -  J Wagner
? Baker - Sparrow - Kolodjashnij
HF: Spargo - Brown - Dunkley
F: Hunt- Jackson - Pickett
Foll: Preuss - ANB - C Wagner
I/c: Bedford - Nietschke - Chandler - Rivers 
23rd man: Bradtke

unless weid shows something preseason.... wouldn't be in best 22.


In my opinion i don't think the best will necessarily, even if fit enough to get picked, will play. The season is too hard and too long. I would like to know how many players in an AFL squad actually play all the games? Who gets paced in and who gets nursed like Tigers and who peaks when. So if your/ we are not in the know, you're not going to know.

I like to think of myself as having a reasonable insight into footy with a pretty good understanding of pros and cons of players on the MFC list.

I can't recall a time when it was harder to pick a best 22. Poor form and injury in 2018, new arrivals, a few favorites entering the twilight and a bunch of youngsters with barely tapped potential contribute to this.

There will be bolters and sliders that no one will expect. 

It will be fascinating year.  

 

19 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

OK NEW TEAM

B: JETTA, MAY, SALEM

HB: HARMES, LEVER, HIBBERD

? LANGON, OLIVER, TOMLINSON

HF: MELKSHAM, T.MCDONALD, PETRACCA

F: PICKETT, WEIDEMAN, FRITSCH

FOLL: GAWN, VINEY, BRAYSHAW

IC: JONES, PETTY, JACKSON, BENNELL

I like your 22 here, mate, but I'd have Vandenberg ahead of Jones on the bench. I reckon this will happen across the season naturally and by the end of it, if we're playing well, I doubt Jones is in the 22.

B: Jetta, May, Lever

HB: Harmes, Smith, Salem

? Langdon, Oliver, Tomlinson

HF: Fritsch, TMac, Vandenberg

F: Melksham, Weid, Pickett

Fol: Gawn, Petracca, Viney

IC: Brayshaw, Jackson, Jones, Hibberd

Em: Petty, Bedford, Dunkley, Kola

NB: If Bennell makes it then unfortunately Jones pushes out for mine. 

 

Edited by big_red_fire_engine

It is too early for me to do a proper 22 without seeing how the new recruits look. In saying this, my main thoughts are:

  • Jones should play a high half back role.
  • Vandenberg is first picked wingman if fit.
  • Smith should be played in the forward line, although he would need to earn his spot in the 22.
  • Hunt should be played in the forward line, although he would need to earn his spot in the 22.
  • Jetta will need to win his spot.
  • Petty, Weideman and Jackson will be fighting to partner with Tom McDonald up forward. Petty or Weideman could also fight for a spot at full back instead of Oscar McDonald.
  • I cannot see spots for both Hore and Lever.
  • Harmes should play in the midfield.

9 hours ago, Stretch Johnson said:

I like to think of myself as having a reasonable insight into footy with a pretty good understanding of pros and cons of players on the MFC list.

I can't recall a time when it was harder to pick a best 22. Poor form and injury in 2018, new arrivals, a few favorites entering the twilight and a bunch of youngsters with barely tapped potential contribute to this.

There will be bolters and sliders that no one will expect. 

It will be fascinating year.  

 

For the first time in a long time it looks like we have genuine cover for 2-3 injuries on each line before it becomes a significant problem. Combined with so few pre-season surgeries and the Burgess factor there is genuine reason for hope in 2020 IMO

21 hours ago, Neil Crompton said:

I think this pre season is going to be the most competitive we will have seen for many a long year. Assuming our squad is fit, the competition for places in the team will be immense. The selectors must be wetting themselves with excitement, not only at having to choose, but also knowing that if they make a mistake with a player, there are at least 2 players to take his place. Our list is finally looking strong. So if all are fit and firing (in other words a fantasy 22), I’d go for:

Jetta OMac Lever

Smith May Hibbert

Langdon Oliver Salem

AVB TMac Petracca

Pickett Weid Fritsch

Gawn Bradshaw Viney

INT Harmes Tomlinson Petty Bennell

Apologies to: Melksham Jones Hannah Hunt Hore Pruess KK Sparrow Dunkley Baker Lockhart Jackson , But all I can say is perform so the selectors have to pick you.

Posters will have other thoughts, but I’d be happy seeing the above selections on the field at some stage during the season, particularly our grand final team.

Melksham was hampered by injury this year. Assuming he’s good to go next season, not fielding him would be a mite foolish and kinda disrespectful. 

Edited by Mel Bourne

11 hours ago, Fat Tony said:

It is too early for me to do a proper 22 without seeing how the new recruits look. In saying this, my main thoughts are:

  • Jones should play a high half back role.
  • Vandenberg is first picked wingman if fit.
  • Smith should be played in the forward line, although he would need to earn his spot in the 22.
  • Hunt should be played in the forward line, although he would need to earn his spot in the 22.
  • Jetta will need to win his spot.
  • Petty, Weideman and Jackson will be fighting to partner with Tom McDonald up forward. Petty or Weideman could also fight for a spot at full back instead of Oscar McDonald.
  • I cannot see spots for both Hore and Lever.
  • Harmes should play in the midfield.

agree with all you say especially J Hunt. He is in my Team...  BUT have to disagree with you on Lever. His is in my number one team.

Looks like we finally have some depth. The range of that depth means we can select the best option based on the opposition. We can also select on the basis of peaking and tapering and resting players for maximum performance. We use the whole squad to have a best team on the field each week. No one guaranteed a spot every week. We can even rest Gawny by playing Pruess in conjunction, off the bench or in place of depends on the opposition.

1 hour ago, Ohio USA - David said:

agree with all you say especially J Hunt. He is in my Team...  BUT have to disagree with you on Lever. His is in my number one team.

Hunt is no certainty and will need to play well in the preseason to get a spot.

I think Lever will play. My point was that Lever and Hore probably don't play in the same team.


23 hours ago, Neil Crompton said:

I think this pre season is going to be the most competitive we will have seen for many a long year. Assuming our squad is fit, the competition for places in the team will be immense. The selectors must be wetting themselves with excitement, not only at having to choose, but also knowing that if they make a mistake with a player, there are at least 2 players to take his place. Our list is finally looking strong. So if all are fit and firing (in other words a fantasy 22), I’d go for:

Jetta OMac Lever

Smith May Hibbert

Langdon Oliver Salem

AVB TMac Petracca

Pickett Weid Fritsch

Gawn Bradshaw Viney

INT Harmes Tomlinson Petty Bennell

Apologies to: Melksham Jones Hannah Hunt Hore Pruess KK Sparrow Dunkley Baker Lockhart Jackson , But all I can say is perform so the selectors have to pick you.

Posters will have other thoughts, but I’d be happy seeing the above selections on the field at some stage during the season, particularly our grand final team.

How then does O MAC get a game on shizen form last year!?? Jones unlucky

MELKSHAM an auto inclusion!

In my opinion if Jones is starting 22 we are in trouble. Melksham definitely starting 22.

O'Mac would need to improve greatly to even be considered. I see Tomlinson as a swing man not really a winger. Would prefer to see Salem make it his own but he needs to really hurt the opposition more ,rather than just linking with Dinky Kicks. Hunt maybe another option here if his discipline improves. 

B: May Lever Salem Harmes Jetta Hibberd Petty (OMac) 

I'd prefer Petty but he's training with the forwards so it'll be OMac.

M: Gawn Oliver Viney Brayshaw Langdon Tomlinson Petracca AVB

Hopefully AVB stays fit.

F: TMac Weid Melksham Fritsch Hannan Jones Bennell (?)

Bennell won't be fit early so there's an opportunity there for someone.

 
29 minutes ago, Grapeviney said:

Good to see you back on the boards BRFE

Thanks, Whilst I read some of last year and attended/watched all year I gave myself a season off posting once I sensed it may not meet expectations. Back into preseason like the rest of the team. Go Dees. 

Edited by big_red_fire_engine


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 86 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 316 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies