Jump to content

Featured Replies

Just now, olisik said:

So many teams trading and here we are sitting on our hands. Classic Goodwin game day performance

You do realise we only have a future 4th round pick to trade?

 
2 hours ago, imElated said:

I really hope we get Darcy Cassar, great user of the ball and can find quite a bit of it, prefers getting the ball on the outside but is still a strong tackler, he's had a 41 disposal game in NAB League and already has a body thats ready for senior football.

I like it. He is a classy ball user and runner. Strong mid or half back. 

Edited by spirit of norm smith
C

 

I thought these picks were reviewable by the AFL at the end of next season, how can they trade it?

Looks pathetic by Gold Coast after they declined a similar pick for Jack Martin. 

Just now, dazzledavey36 said:

[censored]! Sharp gone...

[censored] indeed


1 minute ago, Watts the matter said:

I thought these picks were reviewable by the AFL at the end of next season, how can they trade it?

Looks pathetic by Gold Coast after they declined a similar pick for Jack Martin. 

It will survive purely as Geelong got it.

3 minutes ago, whelan45 said:

You do realise we only have a future 4th round pick to trade?

We had 3,10,28 and some in the 60s. Same amount of picks as most other teams.

 

Suns just traded 11 and 64 for 27! Ridiculous trade

1 minute ago, Good Lord George said:

Suns just traded 11 and 64 for 27! Ridiculous trade

It just shows that they are still incompetent and don't deserve the compensation that they got. They could have easily got this pick for Jack Martin. It's a disgrace.


2 minutes ago, Good Lord George said:

Suns just traded 11 and 64 for 27! Ridiculous trade

Afls doing. 

4 minutes ago, Watts the matter said:

I thought these picks were reviewable by the AFL at the end of next season, how can they trade it?

Looks pathetic by Gold Coast after they declined a similar pick for Jack Martin. 

They apparently received approval to trade it.

I think we all know the AFL "review" wasnt going to take picks off the Suns

1 minute ago, Good Lord George said:

Suns just traded 11 and 64 for 27! Ridiculous trade

Presumably they have a bunch of academy kids next year and are confident the AFL will give them some kind of free hit.  Provided their begging bowl is empty enough at the time.

#goldcoastmendicants

The Trent "Esme" Bianco suspense is killing me.

...

 

Sorry, I mean, Trent Rivers, obviously.

Edited by Little Goffy
TYPO, obviously


Just now, Murph1524 said:

Byrnes, Rivers, Mahony

Please

Would be MFC thing to do to re draft Shannon Byrnes

3 minutes ago, Good Lord George said:

They apparently received approval to trade it.

I think we all know the AFL "review" wasnt going to take picks off the Suns

Do you mean the approval to trade #11 when the AFL handed it out or do you mean they approved that ridiculously unbalanced trade with Geelong?

3 minutes ago, Little Goffy said:

Presumably they have a bunch of academy kids next year and are confident the AFL will give them some kind of free hit.  Provided their begging bowl is empty enough at the time.

#goldcoastmendicants

As part of the AFL package their Academy players don't go into the draft - ie they get them for no draft pick.

Just now, Lucifer's Hero said:

Do you mean the approval to trade #11 when the AFL handed it out or do you mean they approved that ridiculously unbalanced trade with Geelong?

The former. Ridiculous trade, though.


2 minutes ago, Good Lord George said:

The former. Ridiculous trade, though.

The AFL won't do it but should be investigated as a totally unbalanced trade be it draft points or access to top talent vs taking leftovers later in the draft!

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies