Jump to content

What to do with Pick 10?

Dees247
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

I don’t get why we would do 10 & 28 for the cats 2 picks. Why wouldn’t we have just done 8 for those 2 picks? Same result...

  • Quote
    • Like 5
     
    3 minutes ago, Gawn's Beard said:

    I don’t get why we would do 10 & 28 for the cats 2 picks. Why wouldn’t we have just done 8 for those 2 picks? Same result...

    Was wondering this, maybe they insisted on getting 2 picks back?

  • Quote
    8 hours ago, Dees247 said:

    Herald Sun are reporting that we are now going to split 10!

    Was the same article that was up a day earlier saying we’d split 8 and take Jackson at 3 just substituting pick 10 for 8. Not sure if it’s based on further intel that we’ll split 10. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     

    can someone explain what's happened/happening? it's not on The Age website, and I don't read the Hun on principle (I'm also in NNSW so no access to a copy of the Hun)

    So we gave away 8 for what?

    I want to be wrong but I got a bad feeling about this Dr Jones

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    This all feels like the club is trying to be too clever for its own good. Trading away future picks, splitting picks and then splitting them again, etc.

    We can't afford to take risks in this draft. Just pick the best player/s with the picks we have and move on. Stop trying to outsmart everyone else for minimal gains. 

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Haha 1

    3 minutes ago, Superunknown said:

    can someone explain what's happened/happening? it's not on The Age website, and I don't read the Hun on principle (I'm also in NNSW so no access to a copy of the Hun)

    So we gave away 8 for what?

    You can check the Foxsports website instead. Or maybe try the Advertiser or Courier Mail perhaps. The Daily Telegraph is pretty average, but as a broadsheet the Australian is a respectable paper. If not, Mungo will probably have a write-up in the Echo in the coming days. 

    *We traded pick 8 for Fremantle's pick 10 and 28. 

  • Quote
    4 minutes ago, Skuit said:

    You can check the Foxsports website instead. Or maybe try the Advertiser or Courier Mail perhaps. The Daily Telegraph is pretty average, but as a broadsheet the Australian is a respectable paper. If not, Mungo will probably have a write-up in the Echo in the coming days. 

    *We traded pick 8 for Fremantle's pick 10 and 28. 

    Thanks for cutting to the chase.

     

    Edited by Superunknown

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Take 3, 10, 28 all to draft.

    At 10, take whoever is leftover out of Kemp, Stephens, Serong, Ash. Young is now off the cards for us it seems unfortunately.

    I’d be disappointed if we split pick 10 again into more lower picks, as I think we need elite talent and the pool generally thins out quickly heading into the teens.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 11
     
    1 hour ago, ChaserJ said:

    Was the same article that was up a day earlier saying we’d split 8 and take Jackson at 3 just substituting pick 10 for 8. Not sure if it’s based on further intel that we’ll split 10. 

    I thought the same thing. Pretty sure it's an error in the article, as they just updated the original article from pre pick swap. I don't think they meant to suggest we are pick swapping pick 10

  • Quote
    15 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

    Take 3, 10, 28 all to draft.

    At 10, take whoever is leftover out of Kemp, Stephens, Serong, Ash. Young is now off the cards for us it seems unfortunately.

    I’d be disappointed if we split pick 10 again into more lower picks, as I think we need elite talent and the pool generally thins out quickly heading into the teens.

     

    Ash will go before 10 imv.  Probably missed that boat along with Young if you believe all the noise on Jackson.

    Serong a possibility.  Kemp should be there.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    I'll add my voice to the 'don't split 10' chorus (don't think it's on the cards anyway).

    My reading is that there seem to be a group of 8-10 players that are hard to split after Rowell and Anderson. As others have mentioned, it's looking likely that at least one of Kemp, Stevens , Ash, Serong or even Young will slide to 10 - all of which have been firmly in the top 5 discussion since the championships. 

    Geelong recruiters aren't slouches - if they want 10, it's for a reason.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Author

    Cal was on SEN today, saying that we might split 10 today or Wednesday. He mentioned for 15 & 20. Not sure how to feel about that. I have to assume we get Weightman at 15?

    Edited by Dees247

  • Quote
    • Shocked 1
    1 minute ago, Dees247 said:

    Cal was on SEN today, saying that we might split 8 today or Wednesday. He mentioned for 15 & 20. Not sure how to feel about that. I have to assume we get Weightman at 15?

    It’s pick 10 now. So that would be a trade with Gold Coast then. I wonder who we’re targeting with those picks.

    Can effectively rule out any of Young/Ash/Stephens and probably Kemp will be gone by then too.

    Kemp and Weightman would be ideal with 15 and 20.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Author
    10 minutes ago, ben russell said:

    It’s pick 10 now. So that would be a trade with Gold Coast then. I wonder who we’re targeting with those picks.

    Can effectively rule out any of Young/Ash/Stephens and probably Kemp will be gone by then too.

    Kemp and Weightman would be ideal with 15 and 20.

    Sorry, just to be clear, I did mean pick 10 ?

    Edited by Dees247

  • Quote

    Just take teh 3 picks my god, we need really the best talent we can get, i still think taking Jackson at 3 is a mistake, but use 10, to get the next best available of who hasn't already been drafted and pick 28 is chance to take more of a speculative pick. Lets not mess around anymore, Bennell is the risk we are taking, bank the talent and get on with it.

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    Lets trade pick 97 for 3, 10 and 28. That way we will get some news for the AFL.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    35 minutes ago, Dees247 said:

    Cal was on SEN today, saying that we might split 10 today or Wednesday. He mentioned for 15 & 20. Not sure how to feel about that. I have to assume we get Weightman at 15?

    I wonder if they would do 10 for 15 and 20. There was talk they might not even use their pick 20. Or was this scenario having us including 28?

    Then we could look to use 20 and 28 to see if it's possible to move back up.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    38 minutes ago, Dees247 said:

    Cal was on SEN today, saying that we might split 10 today or Wednesday. He mentioned for 15 & 20. Not sure how to feel about that. I have to assume we get Weightman at 15?

    we would only do it if the guy we want will be there at 15. if they're set on Weightman for example it make sense to improve that third pick as much as possible

     

  • Quote
    2 hours ago, Lord Travis said:

    Take 3, 10, 28 all to draft.

    At 10, take whoever is leftover out of Kemp, Stephens, Serong, Ash. Young is now off the cards for us it seems unfortunately.

    I’d be disappointed if we split pick 10 again into more lower picks, as I think we need elite talent and the pool generally thins out quickly heading into the teens.

     

    I’m not giving up on Young until Luke Jackson’s name is called out or the club release something before next week stating their intentions. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    12 hours ago, Dees247 said:

    Herald Sun are reporting that we are now going to split 10!

    Better not miss out on Kemp, Stephens, Ash or a slider for the sake of picking up midgets.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    • Author
    29 minutes ago, Watts the matter said:

    I wonder if they would do 10 for 15 and 20. There was talk they might not even use their pick 20. Or was this scenario having us including 28?

    Then we could look to use 20 and 28 to see if it's possible to move back up.

    They only mentioned trading 10

  • Quote

    Bear with me.

    The two later picks could equal pick 4. Any set worth more points than pick 4 would become more valuable to GWS, if we clarified we would be bidding on Green and assuming they planned to match...

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Love 1
    • Shocked 1
    1 hour ago, Reevesy said:

    Bear with me.

    The two later picks could equal pick 4. Any set worth more points than pick 4 would become more valuable to GWS, if we clarified we would be bidding on Green and assuming they planned to match...

    Trying to follow... are you saying GWS might trade pick 4 for two of our picks?

  • Quote
    •  

    Indeed. On draft night, if we bid on Green at 3 and GWS wish to match, they have 5 minutes to trade away 4 or have it consumed. At this point the pick number becomes less relevant than the attached points. It would be more valuable to GWS to have 12 and 18 than 4, for example.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Love 2
    1 hour ago, Reevesy said:

    Bear with me.

    The two later picks could equal pick 4. Any set worth more points than pick 4 would become more valuable to GWS, if we clarified we would be bidding on Green and assuming they planned to match...

     

    20 minutes ago, Reevesy said:

    Indeed. On draft night, if we bid on Green at 3 and GWS wish to match, they have 5 minutes to trade away 4 or have it consumed. At this point the pick number becomes less relevant than the attached points. It would be more valuable to GWS to have 12 and 18 than 4, for example.

    I like it...

    Potential to take 3, 4 and 28 to the draft.

    That would be a smart move if we could pull it off! I would think another team would be able to trump us here though! 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

      With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 14

      Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

        • Thanks
      • 76 replies
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Collingwood

      The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

      The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • 167 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Collingwood

      I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 37 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Collingwood

      Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

        • Sad
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 532 replies
      Demonland
    View All