Jump to content

Featured Replies

4 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Disappointed that I didn't get to use this pic I made. 

1EF42978-8D85-4F60-973D-FBEC04CC688E.png

Haha Elliott looks like a Thunderbird Employee in that shot!!

 
44 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I don’t think it is rubbish at all. 

That is how bad 2019 was. How can you look at it any differently. We still don’t really know how well Goodwin can Coach. 

Fagan or Goodwin...?

Goodwin’s 2018 Dees won their first two finals.

Fagan’s 2019 Lions lost their only two finals.

Who knows what Fagan’s 2020 will be like?

I’d say that at this point in time they’re probably level pegging.

12 minutes ago, hardtack said:

Goodwin’s 2018 Dees won their first two finals.

Fagan’s 2019 Lions lost their only two finals.

Who knows what Fagan’s 2020 will be like?

I’d say that at this point in time they’re probably level pegging.

I doubt The Lions will crash as hard as we did, but 2020 will tell. 

Regardless 2019 will make it harder to entice Players across. 

We need a forward badly

 
15 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

Not having a crack, not being a defeatist either.

You think Elliot didn't come to us because of Goschs?

I'd say he was always going to stay or go to Brisbane, where he spent his youth and where his bro lives. Also probably because we might be outbid in terms of amount per year.

Our facilities aren't the best, but they haven't deterred May, Lever, Hibberd, Melk, Tomlinson or Langdon

It is not an absolute, he would be very familiar with our facilities, why would he downgrade?  People only do that for money. Obviously when you have 12 or more million dollars each year to pay players you are going to attract some players. Hardly an exciting list of recruits over 5 or more years. One flag between them. Best and fairests? 

I don't know what all the hype is about......Elliott was never, ever, going to come to the MFC as much as we all would have liked to see it transpire.

Fagan is probably the best coach outside of Clarkson.


13 minutes ago, Sorry kids said:

It is not an absolute, he would be very familiar with our facilities, why would he downgrade?  People only do that for money. Obviously when you have 12 or more million dollars each year to pay players you are going to attract some players. Hardly an exciting list of recruits over 5 or more years. One flag between them. Best and fairests? 

Just trying to be positive, rather wallow in constant negativity. So we have terrible facilities, terrible players, and can't do anything right. Got it.

Carry on!

8 minutes ago, Laughing Goat said:

I don't know what all the hype is about......Elliott was never, ever, going to come to the MFC as much as we all would have liked to see it transpire.

Fagan is probably the best coach outside of Clarkson.

Bloke by the name of Hardwick goes alright..

23 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

Just trying to be positive, rather wallow in constant negativity. So we have terrible facilities, terrible players, and can't do anything right. Got it.

Carry on!

I admire you being positive. I went to games for decades, literally, thinking we were a chance to win every week. However the Club needs to be entirely and brutally honest with where they are at as of now. None of us really know what next year will bring on the field but we can control things like our environment, facilities, coaching personal and so on. All of those things must be open to scrutiny just like most of us and most organizations have to deal with on a constant basis. 

 
2 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I don’t think it is rubbish at all. 

That is how bad 2019 was. How can you look at it any differently. We still don’t really know how well Goodwin can Coach. 

Fagan or Goodwin...?

I understand and it's been heavily documented on here that Goodwin is under pressure

You'd hope that any genuine prospects that want to come to the club would not make a superficial decision based on one bad year?

Following that logic, surely StK and Carlton would have no one wanting to join them?

Oh, wait... 


2 hours ago, Sorry kids said:

May and lever prove the point that we have to pay overs to attract quality players. Sorry but if you do not think the playing arena is not of critical importance you are wrong and go against the MFC stated aim of finding an MCG sized venue for training.

What are you talking about? How much did Collingwood pay for Treloar? Essendon for Shiel and Richmond for Prestia?

Strawman argument.

17 minutes ago, jumbo returns said:

I understand and it's been heavily documented on here that Goodwin is under pressure

You'd hope that any genuine prospects that want to come to the club would not make a superficial decision based on one bad year?

You can hope that. I think certain players have done exactly that. We were lucky to 5 games, could have easily been 2 games for the year, plus we lost the last 7 coming home. There was no improvement after the bye. 

There is no way Player Managers are going to be pushing The MFC as a good destination. It is a great prospect for Assistant Coaches, as a challenge, but i don’t think players would view it that way, not this year. We (the Club) did cause damage this year, there will be ramifications because of it. 

It will be a tough 10 days trading for us

Other Clubs just buy up, we are right down the pecking order this year

1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Bloke by the name of Hardwick goes alright..

yes good call.....not a bad resume'

25 minutes ago, A F said:

What are you talking about? How much did Collingwood pay for Treloar? Essendon for Shiel and Richmond for Prestia?

Strawman argument.

I am not interested in what other Clubs do. 

4 hours ago, praha said:

Embarrassing if Brisbane pipe us here and he ends up in QLD.

Are we going to boo Elliot like we booed Judd because we were mad he didn't choose us?

Why is it embarrassing?


2 minutes ago, Demons11 said:

Why is it embarrassing?

Because we courted him all year, but they just jumped in at the last minute. We also offered more than them, so it’s a direct slap in the face. Once again we miss out on the talent and have to settle for discards and NQRs. Nothing changes with this club :(

10 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

Because we courted him all year, but they just jumped in at the last minute. We also offered more than them, so it’s a direct slap in the face. Once again we miss out on the talent and have to settle for discards and NQRs. Nothing changes with this club :(

Do you actually really believe they courted him in the last minute?

Yea, No, No Thanks..............!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

22 minutes ago, Sorry kids said:

I am not interested in what other Clubs do. 

But our according to you our facilities are relatively poor - relative to what? Make up your mind.

Edited by Fifty-5


20 minutes ago, Sorry kids said:

I am not interested in what other Clubs do.

Right. So you want to comment on the market, without any knowledge of the market, and you want us to take you seriously?

19 minutes ago, Demons11 said:

Do you actually really believe they courted him in the last minute?

Yeh that’s rubbish that Brisbane jumped in at the last minute, they didn’t offer Christensen or Taylor new contracts during the season and they’re still yet to be offered contracts. Both are small forwards, my money’s on Brisbane waiting to see what Elliott does before Taylor and Christensen are re-signed. 

Brisbane have been after Elliott for some time. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

5 hours ago, Nasher said:

Because Elliott is infinity times better than Kent?

 

5 hours ago, Demonland said:

I think he was referring to Garlett but your point would still be correct. 

Edit: actually he might have been referring to Kent. 

He was referring to Kent.

It seems like a lot of time and effort and expense just to end up with an injury prone small forward on a 3 year deal. After we'd booted one such for wanting a 3 year deal.

I concede that Elliott is the more dangerous player, but not by so much that it's worth all the palaver.

All moot now anyway.

 
1 hour ago, Moonshadow said:

Following that logic, surely StK and Carlton would have no one wanting to join them?

Oh, wait... 

Difference is that there's a general expectation to compete at those clubs. Competitive people often like to be in competitive environments.

The players efforts of 2019 have resigned us to having to build again through the draft (that outcome may not actually be the worst thing). Hopefully we can uncover a couple of people with the kind of drive to compete and show linear type improvement through to their late 20's (and maybe become the second person at MFC to do that since Jones started).

15 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Yeh that’s rubbish that Brisbane jumped in at the last minute, they didn’t offer Christensen or Taylor new contracts during the season and they’re still yet to be offered contracts. Both are small forwards, my money’s on Brisbane waiting to see what Elliott does before Taylor and Christensen are re-signed. 

Brisbane have been after Elliott for some time. 

?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
    • 393 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies