Jump to content

Featured Replies

30 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

Dont know how Max gets the motivation to play with these blokes.

Their lucky they cant look him in the eye.

I would very much doubt if many could without standing on a box, or in the case of Spargo, on a ladder. 

 
13 minutes ago, bandicoot said:

Goodwin has no bloody idea. How he got us to a prelim finals seems staggering. 

He hasn’t changed his tactics from last year and all the other clubs have worked us out.

No plan B or C and has us stuck in concrete boots. The ‘play on’/hand-pass at all cost game plan is flawed and invariably leads to a turn over. Players have also lost faith in it. 

Hawks won 3 premierships is a row (a feat that might not be repeated this century) possessing the ball by foot. 

Learn something from that football  and adapt it slightly to suit our side. 

Whatever style game you have us playing now, Goodwin, is [censored]...

Agree. Ditto. Ffs get a plan Goody. 

30 minutes ago, The heart beats true said:

I’d love to ask Glenn Bartlett what his criteria for an external revue 

Some song and dance, unless you mean a review.

 
2 minutes ago, Farmer said:

And at half time we trailed by 3 points

Gave up after half time they had “done enough “

they need to try harder , richmond better  in the wet is no excuse. If you are that close at half time   Ability isnot  the question, desire is or game  plan is,

mentally weak and behind the opposition 

and I am an idiot for  caring

So many fringe players making up numbers here, Melksham was hardly there. Taking that into consideration we were competitive enough, yeah it sucks but these are all junk games, who cares? The players don't. Need the reset and a healthy list for 2020.

#2 pick looks real good rn. 

Edited by 3Dee


5 minutes ago, Die Hard Demon said:

As long as they had a crack, enjoyed themselves & made some new friends out there! good on them 

And got their money for tonight’s game

14 minutes ago, chook fowler said:

Preuss is a dud. The big lumox couldn’t even stick a tackle - one of their smalls broke free of him far too easily. He can’t play with Max pure and simple.

Was his biggest supporter arguing for him to be selected. Sorry.

It’s Fantastic that The Ashes are on live for the next 6 weeks

this Footy season is just too awful

 

I guess we all see what we want to see

Although Fritsch was serviceable in defense, I get the feeling he could've had a seriously special year had he been playing in the forward line for the full season. 

He's very much capable of booting 45+ goals over a year. Hopefully his last month is a taste of what's to come in 2020.


10 minutes ago, Farmer said:

The players don't give a stuff? Really? You saw it tonight and thought that? I can't believe it. They were outclassed. Close to the weakest team on paper that I can ever remember.  Guys like Baker and Kennedy Harris ( who didn't play well) nevertheless gave it a red hot go. Fritsch played well, Petty showed a lot, even Wagner had his moments. And at half time we trailed by 3 points. Cameron Ling's comments about Richmind in the wet are dead right, we weren't up to it but no-one wasn't trying

Brilliant Post.

Go back and watch the last 30-40 mins of the last 10 or so games. Its 4 quarters of footy. Not 2.5 or 3.

The same story, week in and week out.

But as long as they tried, thats all that matters right?

 

Petracca missing in 4th as usual.

Baker, Preuss, Melksham, Hibberd, Lewis, Viney, Jones combining for a massive 0 tackles between them for the match. Pathetic, especially in wet weather.

Great game from Gawny Fritsch and Petty show promise the rest are duds. We are 17th for a reason and that's the reason. I don't know where to go from here and now I'm even doubting Goodwin. It's a sorry tale

14 minutes ago, chook fowler said:

Preuss is a dud. The big lumox couldn’t even stick a tackle - one of their smalls broke free of him far too easily. He can’t play with Max pure and simple.

Agree, saw the tackle your talking about.

Ended up spun around and on the ground like he's just tried to stop a steam train. Can't hold a mark either.

Got the size but no skills whatsoever.

 

 

Physically we are stuffed. Richmond players were strolling to the bench all game. At the 19 minute mark of the first quarter our players were barely breathing on the sidelines. We cannot kick, run, chase or tackle and we also can’t compete aerobically now. Basically we are lame ducks. 


Just now, doc roet said:

Agree, saw the tackle your talking about.

Ended up spun around and on the ground like he's just tried to stop a steam train. Can't hold a mark either.

Got the size but no skills whatsoever.

 

 

Preuss is the reason we are useless disgusting decision to pick him up when we have Gawn. Poor move all round.

3 minutes ago, DSP said:

Brilliant Post.

Go back and watch the last 30-40 mins of the last 10 or so games. Its 4 quarters of footy. Not 2.5 or 3.

The same story, week in and week out.

But as long as they tried, thats all that matters right?

 

Plus the fact that only 5 players carry the load for those first 3 qrts.

After half time all I saw was Melb second to the ball or behind their opponents ,  coasting to a result that was not dreadful but had no desire to change the result, we had no one to grab the game by the neck and change the direction. Our leaders if they are the best we have, are part of the reason this year has gone this way.

we need radical change and very hard decisions!

Goodwin press conferences, “we want to be a team that wins” please, give the supporters something, absolutely lame lame responses after every loss, the same dribble over & over. 


Footy's a bloody tough game.  Unfortunately as a club we make it look even tougher, outside of about one half of competitive effort and results or, doing really well, we might do it for three quarters.

Too easy to beat.  I couldn't be bothered going in to the mess that is the MFC for almost a quarter or two of pretty much every match this season, even against the worst opposition.  Amateur is about the best way of describing it.  Certainly not AFL worthy over four quarters.

The first half we actually appeared to be on track for a close contest and, all round, it was certainly a solid effort with some better ball movement, skills, some decent switching, a reasonable team grid/zone defense happening and some hard work to maintain structures around the ball (yes even on the outside!).   But i clearly forgot about our ability to maintain this is usually poor and should have realised that as our conditioning, strength, general skills and ability to run both ways dropped away severely, the Tigers would maintain theirs, and the rest is as they say, history repeating.  General skills, footy smarts in the wet, intensity and ability to move the ball and maintain possession Shizen in the second half!

Thought i saw a substantial change up towards a bit more of a possession / patience tempo game at stages in the first half though.  So Goody might already be changing things up a little on the training track.  Has someone been having some hard words with the coach outside of the FD?  Who knows.  Pure speculation.  But he's clearly expressed (as have the players in their pressers) a reluctance to change much of anything.

One of the best passages was the play that(for me) demonstrated what i thought was an example of this change up, was off HB all the way up the field with some precision and deliberation.  Finished with Dunkley converting after marking a short ball from Jones (?) on the lead (i think it was Dunkley).  A great example of general skills and decision making working beautifully, WITHOUT the insanity of the usual "play on at every opportunity and hand ball / kick wherever without truly assessing first / numbers numbers attacking the resulting spilled or loose ball" chaos rubbish.

Unfortunately we seemed to go into our shells (or the Tiges put us there) in the second half and normal chaos footy began to dominate our decision making once more.  I guess it's hard to maintain a change up to method / style after playing with nothing except "numbers at the ball/chaos play on footy" for most of the season.  Old habits die hard but unfortunately our very ordinary skill levels reappeared once more.

We should see some improvement next year with a decent pre-season and minimal injuries (obviously it wouldn't take much to do so given this year's horribilis) but only time will tell if it is just a dead cat bounce ....or something more. 

Will Goody finally bite the bullet and realise that major changes/additions are needed to game style and same with the list?  He and the FD must be thinking the same re the list surely.

As with all things MFC, hoping for the best...preparing for the worst in 2020.

Edited by Rusty Nails

Just now, Vineytime said:

Goodwin press conferences, “we want to be a team that wins” please, give the supporters something, absolutely lame lame responses after every loss, the same dribble over & over. 

We want to support a team that wins. But here we all are, failing to achieve our life goals. 

Some observations:

People want to pot Jones, but the number of times team mates handballed to his BOOTS in the first half did my head in.

We dont know when to go fast, or go slow.  We seem to use gear changes at exactly the wrong time.

We have major issues with decision making and execution.  

Our tackling is pathetic.  They change direction and it is like keystone cops.  We have limited speed on the park.

Our ability to win contests within 30 m of the goal line forward or back is almost zero. In our back half, we give up scores.  In our front half, they just waltz out.

Preuss was an absolute liability.  Gave away stupid frees in the ruck, cant mark, cant pick the ball up.  A liability out there.

Oscar Mac was terrible.  Really really terrible.

WTF was that throw in that their ruck kicked for a goal?  Half distance, and Preuss trialled the contest by 3m.

We have some talent that can build.  Petty, Baker, Dunkley all did good things at times,  In a great team, they would look awesome.

Max rules.  Simple.

The end to this year cannot come quick enough.  We were in it until half time, and then let ourselves down.

(special mention to the atrocious umpiring, not that it would have really changed much.)

 
Just now, dazzledavey36 said:

Didn't watch the game.. how was JKH

Was brave and got better the wetter the day got. Sadly doesn’t impact the contest enough and doesn’t get the ball enough. Tried really hard but he’s just another average inside mid. Fine to keep as filler but he will never make it. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 66 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies