Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author
14 hours ago, adonski said:

R1 March 23, MCG 1.45pm Saturday afternoon vs Port Adelaide

Underwhelmed.

Wrong magpies

 

Are people really disturbed that we are playing round 1 at home on a Saturday afternoon?? Perhaps they would prefer Hawthorn's twilight game in SA, North's Sunday evening game over in the West or the Saint's 1.10 pm game against Gold Coast on a Sunday lunch time? There's no pleasing some people. 

So Crows in the Alice and Freo in Darwin looking most likely.

 

Pumped we are playing Port at home. We couldn’t beat them this year so we owe them a proper stuffing

we had our biggest crowds for years in 2018 so I wouldnt be too worried about money. We’ll get some big games throughout the year and push our membership towards 50K

We will destroy them and kick the season off in style.

Hopefully we get a return game against them at Adelaide Oval too, we play that ground very well.

Edited by Petraccattack


Round one, 2019 

Thursday, March 21

Carlton v Richmond at the MCG, 7.20pm AEDT

Friday, March 22

Collingwood v Geelong at the MCG, 7.50pm AEDT

Saturday, March 23

Melbourne v Port Adelaide at the MCG, 1.45pm AEDT

Adelaide v Hawthorn at Adelaide Oval, 4.05pm ACDT

Western Bulldogs v Sydney at Marvel Stadium, 7.25pm AEDT

Brisbane v West Coast at the Gabba, 7.20pm AEST

Sunday, March 24

St Kilda v Gold Coast at Marvel Stadium, 1.10pm AEDT

Greater Western Sydney v Essendon at Spotless Stadium, 3.20pm AEDT

Fremantle v North Melbourne, Optus Stadium, 3.20pm AWST

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

What an absolutely horrendous round of footy. The geniuses at City Hall have done it again. No idea. 

So boring having Carlton and Richmond open the season every year.

3 hours ago, praha said:

Crazy talk. To lose money on an MCG home game you need a sub-23k crowd. We'll get 45k-50k imo.

How would it work if 40k of the 50 were Dees members bringing their own cheese platters?

 

So the Freo v North game would be 5:20pm AEST?

I hope Sunday twilights don’t change from the already horrible time slot of 4:40

8 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

So the Freo v North game would be 5:20pm AEST?

I hope Sunday twilights don’t change from the already horrible time slot of 4:40

6.20 I think as WA don't have daylight saving.


14 hours ago, Pates said:

Two schools of thought on the round one fixture vs Port.

Positive side:

- home game to start the year (always what you want)

- against an interstate team provides greater opportunity for a win

- potentially fly under the radar a little bit which can be good early in the year

Negative side:

- shafted commercially to start to year makes us less attractive to sponsors, 1pm timeslot is a dead timeslot on pay TV

- though an interstate team against us at the G provides a great opportunity for a win, I would prefer kicking the year off against a tough Melbourne team to get us in the big game frame of mind. A loss could also get us front and centre for a bollocking from the media

- AFL (and us) have missed a really good opportunity to build on what a great round one we had last year. Great crowd, two Vic teams, traditional rivals, we played two ripper games and a final with 90k+. I would’ve thought Cats v Dees Saturday arvo/night would be a great thing to build on

This.

I can't understand the AFL's thinking here. Quite bizarre.

6 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Port is not a good start to the season financially.  We will probably lose money or barely break even.

Last year the majority of our Home games at the G were against i/state teams or small Vic teams both of which are terrible for our Revenue.  Add to that our two Home games in NT and our revenue from Home games becomes rather meagre.  In 2019 we will be relying on the QB vs Coll games to top up the coffers (ANZAC Eve is Away). 

Oh, and please no more gifting Carlton and Essendon 4 - 6 Home games each at the G.  It is not their home ground.  Let them play at Marvel!!

I reckon we'll get 35k+ to this game, which means well and truly makes us money. Besides the end of the season, where finals are up for grabs, Round 1 is probably the best time to draw a crowd against an interstate side. We play this game in the middle of the year and I don't think we draw as many.

But that is not to say I'm not disappointed by this fixture. A real opportunity missed to maximise gate return or merely crowd numbers against another Victorian club.

11 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

6.20 I think as WA don't have daylight saving.

  Cheers, I thought Sunday twilight games no matter where they are played always commenced at 4:40 AEST, or is it different in the early rounds? 

Pretty boring looking round anyway, we’ll just have to enjoy our replay from Saturday arvo right through until Sunday night. 

39 minutes ago, A F said:

I reckon we'll get 35k+ to this game, which means well and truly makes us money. Besides the end of the season, where finals are up for grabs, Round 1 is probably the best time to draw a crowd against an interstate side. We play this game in the middle of the year and I don't think we draw as many.

But that is not to say I'm not disappointed by this fixture. A real opportunity missed to maximise gate return or merely crowd numbers against another Victorian club.

I think there's an upside to having Game 1 at th G for membership sales at the ground, rather than Dees playing there in Round 2 for the  first MCG game

2 hours ago, beelzebub said:

Underwhelmed.

Wrong magpies

The real story here is the AFL scheduling a train wreck for the opening game. It will kill the Blues season from Day 1. I can hear the post mortem now;

 

"...what were they thinking..."

 

 


Fair comments by those that suggest a crowd of 25K+ will break even/make money.  But this for the majority of the season from smallish crowds vs i/state and small Vic clubs is not financially beneficial. 

But, my comment re financial impact of Home game opponents was that if the majority are vs 1/state or small Vic teams we are being disadvantaged.  Imagine the difference to our bottom line if we played Ess, Hawth, Rich or even Carlton at Home at least once each season.  Anyway, I feel we have earnt the right to host those clubs at the G.

Will eagerly await the fixture to see how we fare.  I bet Carlton do better than us at the G and they aren't even a tenant!  Ditto Essendon but to a lesser extent.

 

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

Just now, Lucifer's Hero said:

Fair comments by those that suggest a crowd of 25K+ will break even/make money.  But this from smallish crowds vs i/state and small Vic clubs are not financially sustainable. 

But, my comment re financial impact of Home game opponents was that if the majority are vs 1/state or small Vic teams we are being disadvantaged.  Imagine the difference on our bottom line if we played Ess, Hawth, Rich ore even Carlton at Home at least once each season.  Anyway, I feel we have earnt the right to host those clubs at the G.

Will eagerly await the fixture to see how we fare.  I bet Carlton do better than us at the G and they aren't even a tenant!  Ditto Essendon but to a lesser extent.

 

A number of Carlton fans I know have just about given up footy. There's only so much longer that the AFL can justify Carlton as a 'big' crowd-drawing club. 

FWIW, if this rebuild fails for them, I reckon their membership will dip below ours.

16 hours ago, Pinball Wizard said:

We played Port Adelaide at the MCG in Round 1, 2013 and were humiliated.

 I’m not talking about revenge but it’s time to put them in their place.

Don't worry we have long memories, a royal spanking is on the cards.

Edited by Win4theAges

16 minutes ago, A F said:

A number of Carlton fans I know have just about given up footy. There's only so much longer that the AFL can justify Carlton as a 'big' crowd-drawing club. 

FWIW, if this rebuild fails for them, I reckon their membership will dip below ours.

Just revoke their license to operate . . . can we do that?

19 minutes ago, A F said:

A number of Carlton fans I know have just about given up footy. There's only so much longer that the AFL can justify Carlton as a 'big' crowd-drawing club. 

FWIW, if this rebuild fails for them, I reckon their membership will dip below ours.

If we are serious about expansion, Carlton membership is what we have to surpass. Won't happen in 2019 but 2020 is a possibility.

Shame about the prelim performance.. probably cost us 2-4k of new members immediately signing up.

The other impact of the low key first round fixture is on reserved seats. No encouragement to sign up to a season of reservation as we all know there will be plenty of seats.


19 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

If we are serious about expansion, Carlton membership is what we have to surpass. Won't happen in 2019 but 2020 is a possibility.

Shame about the prelim performance.. probably cost us 2-4k of new members immediately signing up.

The other impact of the low key first round fixture is on reserved seats. No encouragement to sign up to a season of reservation as we all know there will be plenty of seats.

Yep, exactly. If Hawthorn have a period of rebuild too, there's a chance they could dip to 55-60k members and we could catch them too. 

Win one flag and we can legitimately aim for 60k members. Win a second or more and have some sustained success, and 70k in 5 years is within reach.

Edited by A F

I suppose it is better to play Port Rnd 1 on a Saturday and get 40,000 rather than a Rnd 14 Sunday twilight match and get 23,000. 

The AFL have to please 17 other clubs.

When's the last time we travelled in round 1?

Seriously, lol at demonland and some of the complaining posters.

 

 
  • Author
9 minutes ago, stevethemanjordan said:

The AFL have to please 17 other clubs.

When's the last time we travelled in round 1?

Seriously, lol at demonland and some of the complaining posters.

 

Not complaining..just not particularly excited about Port...as an opening round. 

Youd think the AFL might like to start with an emphatic BANG ...footy's back. Surely they could find us a Victorian team.

2 hours ago, A F said:

A number of Carlton fans I know have just about given up footy. There's only so much longer that the AFL can justify Carlton as a 'big' crowd-drawing club. 

FWIW, if this rebuild fails for them, I reckon their membership will dip below ours.

It has to be said HOW THE FARRRCK DO CARLTON get to open the season???

Someone must have Goat photo's

Deescraceful 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 146 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 41 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Like
    • 322 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 31 replies