Jump to content

Five go - Pedersen, Bugg, McKenna & 2 big men in King & Flipper

Featured Replies

Posted

 

Edited by DavidNeitz9

 

Preuss must be a done deal then. Also was Bugg out of contract? shame we couldn't get trade value from him.

  • Author
1 minute ago, MurDoc516 said:

Preuss must be a done deal then. Also was Bugg out of contract? shame we couldn't get trade value from him.

He was mate

 

Thought Mitch King showed enough early to do better in the VFL this year and kick on but once he was dropped from the VFL side that wasn't happening. 

Flip and athletic type but lacked any real AFL qualities and did nothing at Casey.

Feel for Pat McKenna, had a terrible run with injuries and couldn't get anything going at Casey but even without the fitness if you've got an AFL future you should show something in the 2's.

By all reports all pretty good guys and good team mates so we'll need to reload and go again at the drafts.

That gives us 6 spots on senior list with AVB, JKH and Kent uncontracted.  


Just now, drdrake said:

That gives us 6 spots on senior list with AVB, JKH and Kent uncontracted.  

AVB and JKH are surely getting new deals. Kent might want to leave. 

2 minutes ago, MurDoc516 said:

AVB and JKH are surely getting new deals. Kent might want to leave. 

Add Kent into the Hogan deal to ensure we get 2 first rounders and change

I’ ll back the list managers but Think Bugg could have been handy  as a back up . 

 
5 minutes ago, drdrake said:

That gives us 6 spots on senior list with AVB, JKH and Kent uncontracted.  

I believe D.Johnston and D.Kelity are also both uncontracted as yet...

5 go and 7 spots on the list, that is quite a cleanout.


4 minutes ago, drdrake said:

Add Kent into the Hogan deal to ensure we get 2 first rounders and change

Kent could fit in Hogan's suitcase or maybe we could agree to trade hogan and send Kent over with a Hogan mask instead.

Hopefully delisting all three established (CP) and potential developing rucks means that Preuss is a done deal.

 

7 spots + the potential of Hogan/JKH/Kent leaving. We must seriously be confident on landing some free agents to fill the list. Can’t see us taking more then 4 picks at the ND

Gee wiz... 

Maybe we are having an active trade period? 7 spots on the list ready to go! 


2 minutes ago, GCDee said:

Gee wiz... 

Maybe we are having an active trade period? 7 spots on the list ready to go! 

It's 6 spots and 1 rookie spot

22 minutes ago, MurDoc516 said:

Preuss must be a done deal then.

Surely thats locked in.

Kudos to MFC for telling them now they won't get contracts.  It gives their managers time to find another club to which they can go for free as they will be Delisted Free Agents.

It is a respectful way of letting players go, unlike some clubs hold on to their players till very late in the trade cycle in the hope they get a pick of some small value late in the draft.

I would be very happy to see any of them find their way to a new club.


Wow, this is a huge clean out so far, also is Tyson going to the Saints? So then that will another one gone.

I cannot understand why people talk of Hogan being traded. It is just insane. I wont even look at the trade Hogan thread.

 

Have heard that JKH and Tim Smith have signed new 1 year deals and Keilty elevated to the senior list.

The footy department are not mucking around!

Premiership window is open and they make an additional 5 spots on the list. Wow, 7 spots on the list now.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 123 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 381 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies