Jump to content

Ollie Wines

beelzebub
beelzebub
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

30 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

What if we traded Viney for Wines?

Ā 

On raw stats -Ā kicks, marks, disposals, Wines is an upgrade onĀ VineyĀ and has proven (until this year) to be more durable. However, Wines has worse disposal efficiency - going at 65% andĀ turns the ball over more.Ā 

Whats more is that Port would be thinking Wines is way more valuable. Former no. 7 pick, co-captain of the club as a straight swap for a downgrade. Sure you could swap picks to even that up. But as Iā€™ve said earlier we shouldnt be selling the farm and taking up our focusĀ forĀ another or replacement slow inside mid with poor disposals

  • Quote
    • Ā 
    3 minutes ago, AaronDaveyChipsAndGravey said:

    On raw stats -Ā kicks, marks, disposals, Wines is an upgrade onĀ VineyĀ and has proven (until this year) to be more durable. However, Wines has worse disposal efficiency - going at 65% andĀ turns the ball over more.Ā 

    Whats more is that Port would be thinking Wines is way more valuable. Former no. 7 pick, co-captain of the club as a straight swap for a downgrade. Sure you could swap picks to even that up. But as Iā€™ve said earlier we shouldnt be selling the farm and taking up our focusĀ forĀ another or replacement slow inside mid with poor disposals

    Disposal efficiency is a useless stat IMO. The factors they use to determine it aren't great and as a stat it lacks a lot of context. Watching games I wouldn't have rated Viney's disposal better then Wines.

    Viney is rated as the worst kick inside 50 in the whole comp this year, a huge area of weakness for us. I'm not sure where Wines ranks in that stat, but clearly he wouldn't be worse than Viney so wouldn't be an improvement in that area.

    I wouldn't sell the farm for Wines either, and wouldn't want to sweeten the deal much if it was Viney for Wines, just thought it was an interesting hypothetical.

  • Quote
    1 minute ago, Lord Nev said:

    Disposal efficiency is a useless stat IMO. The factors they use to determine it aren't great and as a stat it lacks a lot of context. Watching games I wouldn't have rated Viney's disposal better then Wines.

    Viney is rated as the worst kick inside 50 in the whole comp this year, a huge area of weakness for us. I'm not sure where Wines ranks in that stat, but clearly he wouldn't be worse than Viney so wouldn't be an improvement in that area.

    I wouldn't sell the farm for Wines either, and wouldn't want to sweeten the deal much if it was Viney for Wines, just thought it was an interesting hypothetical.

    Never saidĀ Viney is a great kick either, and completelyĀ agree that disposal efficiency isnt the be and end all of stats, justĀ wanted to show theyre just as bad as each other in an area which has been our weakness all year. Wines for me falls into that can hit a 25m target or just blazes clearing balls into turnovers kind of player with little else except immense in-and-under extraction skills - of which we have an abundance of.

    Its an interesting hypothetical to be sure, but one that doesnt make much sense given our position IMO

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     

    Pass, can't kick, more of the same of what we have.

    Watch the finals the teams that will progress are the ones that control the ball, it isn't all about winning the Football at the contest anymore it is more important to keep it once you have control.Ā  We cant do that so we need players that can, Wines isn't one of these players

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    2 hours ago, AaronDaveyChipsAndGravey said:

    Never saidĀ Viney is a great kick either, and completelyĀ agree that disposal efficiency isnt the be and end all of stats, justĀ wanted to show theyre just as bad as each other in an area which has been our weakness all year. Wines for me falls into that can hit a 25m target or just blazes clearing balls into turnovers kind of player with little else except immense in-and-under extraction skills - of which we have an abundance of.

    Its an interesting hypothetical to be sure, but one that doesnt make much sense given our position IMO

    Yeah, that's why I suggested Viney for Wines. Like for like. Agree that last thing we need is another in and under type for sure.

    Just think it changes some things up for us from a leadership perspective and a dynamic as a group.

  • Quote

    2 hours ago, drdrake said:

    Pass, can't kick, more of the same of what we have.

    Watch the finals the teams that will progress are the ones that control the ball, it isn't all about winning the Football at the contest anymore it is more important to keep it once you have control.Ā  We cant do that so we need players that can, Wines isn't one of these players

    Agree. Inside mid with poor kicking skills, we have those type of players.Ā 

  • Quote
    4 hours ago, Lord Nev said:

    Disposal efficiency is a useless stat IMO. The factors they use to determine it aren't great and as a stat it lacks a lot of context. Watching games I wouldn't have rated Viney's disposal better then Wines.

    Viney is rated as the worst kick inside 50 in the whole comp this year, a huge area of weakness for us. I'm not sure where Wines ranks in that stat, but clearly he wouldn't be worse than Viney so wouldn't be an improvement in that area.

    I wouldn't sell the farm for Wines either, and wouldn't want to sweeten the deal much if it was Viney for Wines, just thought it was an interesting hypothetical.

    Maybe watch the WCE v ESS game again from last night LN? You will clearly see how disposal efficiency won that game.....Check out Lewis Jetta's game/stats: 85% efficiency, 19 disposals, 400 m gained,Ā  4 score involvements & in the best 5 on the ground.

    IMO it is the most important stat in our game. Simon Goodwin thinks so as well & I remember him saying after the Collingwood game that 'our disposal efficiency & accountability is killing us'.......(he might be delusionalĀ though)

    I'm with you LN.....Wines, no thanks! These are the sorts of players we have too many of.

  • Quote
    10 hours ago, John Demonic said:

    Ā 

    Melbourne
    If

    Ollie Wines is indeed gettable ...

    then

    the Dees should take a close look.

    Absolutely. Ā Guns like Wines should always be a target. Ā Donā€™t make the same mistakeĀ twiceĀ 

    Oliver Viney Wines Petracca Harmes insideĀ 

    Brayshaw Langdon Salem outsideĀ 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    Ā 
    6 hours ago, Lord Nev said:

    What if we traded Viney for Wines?

    Ā 

    That was my thinking...

  • Quote

    Goodwin probably already offering up 2 first rounders

  • Quote
    8 hours ago, Wiseblood said:

    Spot on, ADCAG.Ā  Supporters at the moment want change, and rightly so, but it means we want the club to beĀ keen on anyone and everyone.Ā  That won't happen - we will be lucky to get 2 - 3Ā players through trades/free agency who will slot in as best 22 players.Ā  We can't put time into every single player who might be looking at new opportunities.

    2-3 players can include Wines (and we can include our first round draft pick next year for outside speed). If we're getting Langdon. If we're in the hunt for Tomlinson and acquire him: Then who else? Of course, much remains to be seen about who we're chasing come trade week. However ponder this: If Brayshaw has a poor year next year, and Wines stays and has a big year. which potential trade do you think we will have rued not pursuing? Of course Wines is not an immediate need, but there's such a thing as jumping on an opportunity that arises too.

    Edited by John Demonic

  • Quote
    12 minutes ago, John Demonic said:

    2-3 players can include Wines (and we can include our first round draft pick next year for outside speed). If we're getting Langdon. If we're in the hunt for Tomlinson and acquire him: Then who else? Of course, much remains to be seen about who we're chasing come trade week. However ponder this: If Brayshaw has a poor year next year, and Wines stays and has a big year. which potential trade do you think we will have rued not pursuing? Of course Wines is not an immediate need, but there's such a thing as jumping on an opportunity that arises too.

    Agree

  • Quote
    18 minutes ago, John Demonic said:

    2-3 players can include Wines (and we can include our first round draft pick next year for outside speed). If we're getting Langdon. If we're in the hunt for Tomlinson and acquire him: Then who else? Of course, much remains to be seen about who we're chasing come trade week. However ponder this: If Brayshaw has a poor year next year, and Wines stays and has a big year. which potential trade do you think we will have rued not pursuing? Of course Wines is not an immediate need, but there's such a thing as jumping on an opportunity that arises too.

    Why do we need Wines?

    Serious question there.Ā  What does he add to our side that we don't already have?

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Love 1
    5 hours ago, Laughing Goat said:

    Maybe watch the WCE v ESS game again from last night LN? You will clearly see how disposal efficiency won that game.....Check out Lewis Jetta's game/stats: 85% efficiency, 19 disposals, 400 m gained,Ā  4 score involvements & in the best 5 on the ground.

    IMO it is the most important stat in our game. Simon Goodwin thinks so as well & I remember him saying after the Collingwood game that 'our disposal efficiency & accountability is killing us'.......(he might be delusionalĀ though)

    I'm with you LN.....Wines, no thanks! These are the sorts of players we have too many of.

    You can technically have a turnover and have it counted as an "effective disposal". It's a useless stat.

    Ā 

  • Quote

    8 hours ago, Wiseblood said:

    Why do we need Wines?

    Serious question there.Ā  What does he add to our side that we don't already have?

    What we don't currently have is Brayshaw's 2018 form and there seems to be an assumption that he will return to it next year. I'm sceptical and see Wines as an immediate upgrade, both in terms of his centre clearance work and his ability to deliver it into the forward line more often, or an ability to play up rotating at half forward with Tracc in middle.

    Who has the higher ceiling is debatable, but they're similar players at the same age, although Wines would add more experience and more leadership qualities. If he became available, why not jump on the opportunity and trade one for the other and freshen up the midfield dynamic we currently have and not go into next year assuming everything will click back into gear if we add Langdon and pick 3. As I said above, it's a horizontal trade move, so it's not absolutely necessary. We don't need Wines, but there could be benefits if it's trading away the potential for another poor Brayshaw year.

    Edited by John Demonic

  • Quote
    17 hours ago, drdrake said:

    Pass, can't kick, more of the same of what we have.

    Watch the finals the teams that will progress are the ones that control the ball, it isn't all about winning the Football at the contest anymore it is more important to keep it once you have control.Ā  We cant do that so we need players that can, Wines isn't one of these players

    The game evolves and teams follow other successful teams. Hawthorn in their prime were skilful and had elite skills all around the ground (until they got Frawley). Keeping possession is a passing phase.

    We will bounce back next year and our brand of football will be hard at the contest with a defence that intercepts everything and then repels. Other teams will copy us.

  • Quote
    3 hours ago, John Demonic said:

    What we don't currently have is Brayshaw's 2018 form and there seems to be an assumption that he will return to it next year. I'm sceptical and see Wines as an immediate upgrade, both in terms of his centre clearance work and his ability to deliver it into the forward line more often, or an ability to play up rotating at half forward with Tracc in middle.
    Ā 

    how many of our players had 2018 form this year. Max and ??Ā  so your assumption could apply to 30+ other players, not sure why Brayshaw has been singled out. We know he has the capability to play better and obviously having his team mates around him playing better would help raise his game. Ollies form this year has not been outstanding, but i guess the assumption is that his form will return next year.

  • Quote
    13 hours ago, Lord Nev said:

    You can technically have a turnover and have it counted as an "effective disposal". It's a useless stat.

    Ā 

    Yeah can't work that out but obviously not an important stat for Goodwin either as we have the biggest turnovers in the AFL......

  • Quote
    • Haha 1
    5 minutes ago, Laughing Goat said:

    Yeah can't work that out but obviously not an important stat for Goodwin either as we have the biggest turnovers in the AFL......

    Haha true mate.

  • Quote

    I haven't looked up his stats and correct me if I'm wrong but from what I've seen of Ollie he is an excellent mark of the footy? I've been thinking this is an area we need to improve and Ollie would be strong in the contest on the ground and in the air. I'd dare say he'dĀ become the top contested mark in our midfield groupĀ Max aside. I think he would benefit our side due to this and would happily see him added to our list.

  • Quote
    On 9/6/2019 at 1:08 PM, drdrake said:

    Pass, can't kick, more of the same of what we have.

    Watch the finals the teams that will progress are the ones that control the ball, it isn't all about winning the Football at the contest anymore it is more important to keep it once you have control.Ā  We cant do that so we need players that can, Wines isn't one of these players

    Wow!

    What an extraordinary turnaround!

    Weren't you bagging out Watts about 'not getting his head over the footy' now you say it's not about the contest anymore and about holding onto the footy (with kicking skills, no doubt?)

    You have no idea

  • Quote
    23 hours ago, jumbo returns said:

    Wow!

    What an extraordinary turnaround!

    Weren't you bagging out Watts about 'not getting his head over the footy' now you say it's not about the contest anymore and about holding onto the footy (with kicking skills, no doubt?)

    You have no idea

    Read the post again, I posted it isn't all about the contest anymore, meaning you need to be able to win the ball but more importantly keep the ball, suggest you have no idea ourĀ turnovers is the reason we finished 17th.Ā  Adding Wines just adds another player that is extremely limited by foot.

    Edited by drdrake

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    Ā 
    On 9/6/2019 at 7:33 PM, spirit of norm smith said:

    Wtf.

    Wines and Port 3rd round 2020

    for

    MFC 2020 1st round and Neal-Bullen.Ā 

    Anyone onboard? Slightly amended.Ā Ā Speculative!!!

  • Quote
    7 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

    Anyone onboard? Slightly amended.Ā Ā Speculative!!!

    ANB would be worth absolutely nothing to them, and you're also asking for them to give us a third rounder to go with trading their co-captain.

    Fanciful thinking.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • FEATURE: 1925

      ļ»æA hundred years ago today, on 2 May 1925, Melbourne kicked off the new season with a 47 point victory over St Kilda to take top place on the VFL ladder after the opening round of the new season.Ā  Top place was a relatively unknown position for the team then known as the ā€œFuchsias.ā€ They had finished last in 1923 and rose by only one place in the following year although the final home and away round heralded a promise of things to come when they surprised the eventual premiers Essendon. That victory set the stage for more improvement and it came rapidly. In this series, I will tell the story of how the 1925 season unfolded for the Melbourne Football Club and how it made the VFL finals for the first time in a decade on the way to the ultimate triumph a year later.

        • Love
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: West Coast

      Saturdayā€™s election night game in Perth between the West Coast Eagles and Melbourne represents 18th vs 15th which makes it a tough decision as to which party to favour. The Eagles have yet to break the ice under their new coach inĀ Andrew McQualter who is the second understudy in a row to confront Demon Coach Simon Goodwin who was also winless until a fortnight ago. On that basis, many punters might be considering to go with the donkey vote but Iā€™ve been assigned with the task of helping readers to come to a considered opinion on this matter of vital importance across the nation. It was almost a year ago that I wrote a preview here of the Demonsā€™ away game against the Eagles (under the name William from Waalitj because it was Indigenous Round).Ā  I issued a warning that it was a danger game, basedĀ on my local knowledge that the home team were no longer easybeats and that they possessed a wunderkind generational player in Harley Reid who was capable of producing stellar performances playing among men a decade and more older than he.Ā  At the time, the Eagles already had two winsĀ off the back of a couple of the young manā€™s masterclasses and they had recently given the Bombers a scare straight after their Anzac Day blockbuster draw against the then reigning premiers.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 1 reply
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 08

      Round 08 of the 2025 AFL Season kicks off on Thursday with a must-win game for the Bombers to stay in touch with the top eight, while the struggling Roos seek a morale-boosting upset. Friday sees the Saints desperate for a win as well if they are to stay in finals contention and their opponents the Dockers will be eager to crack in to the Top 8 with a win on the road. Saturday kicks off with a pivotal clash for both sides asthe Bulldogs look to solidify their top-eight spot, while Port seeks to shake their pretender tag. Then the Crows will be looking to steady their topsy turvy season against a resurgent Blues looking to make it 4 wins on the trot. On Election Night a Blockbuster will see the ladder-leading Pies take on the Cats, who are keen to bounce back after a narrow loss. On Sunday the Sydney Derby promises fireworks as the Giants aim to cement their top-eight status, while the Swans fight to keep their season alive. The Hawks, celebrating their centenary, will be looking to easily account for the Tigers who are desperate to halt their slide. The Round concludes on Sunday Night with a top end of the table QClash with significant ladder implications; both Queensland teams are in scintillating form. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons?

      • 148 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: West Coast

      The Demons hit the road in Round 8, heading to Perth to face the West Coast Eagles at Optus Stadium. With momentum building, the Dees will be aiming for a third straight victory to keep their season revival on course. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
      • 563 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Richmond

      The fans who turned up to the MCG for Melbourneā€™s Anzac Day Eve clash against Richmond would have been disappointed if they turned up to see a great spectacle.Ā As much as this was a night for the 71,635 in attendance to commemorate heroes of the nationā€™s past wars, it was also a time for the Melbourne Football Club to consolidate upon its first win after a horrific start to the 2025 season. On this basis, despite the fact that it was an uninspiring and dour struggle for most of its 100 minutes, the night will be one for the fans to remember. They certainly got value out of the pre match activity honouring those who fought for their country. The MCG and the lights of the city as backdrop was made for nights such as these and, in my view, we received a more inspirational ceremony of Anzac culture than others both here and elsewhere around the country.Ā 

        • Love
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Richmond

      The match up of teams competing in our great Aussie game at its second highest level is a rarity for a work day Thursday morning but the blustery conditions that met the players at a windswept Casey Fields was something far more commonplace.They turned the opening stanza between the Casey Demons and a somewhat depleted Richmond VFL into a mess of fumbling unforced errors, spilt marks and wasted opportunities for both sides but they did set up a significant win for the home team which is exactly what transpired on this Anzac Day round opener. Casey opened up strong against the breeze with the first goal to Aidan Johnson, the Tigers quickly responded and the game degenerated into a defensive slog and the teams were level when the first siren sounded.

        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All