Jump to content

Featured Replies

4 minutes ago, stevethemanjordan said:

Would much rather Ben Lennon who I think is not too dissimilar, but has been in the system for a while and can't crack a game in Richmond's small forwardline.

 

Reminds me a little of Ben Kennedy.  I'd have him if he came super cheap, though.

 
7 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

Reminds me a little of Ben Kennedy.  I'd have him if he came super cheap, though.

In playing style? Or just the fact that he is similarly a high pick who can't get a regular game at the club who drafted him?

 

History of wrist problems going back to 2014 has not helped him.

Smart kid that showed plenty in draft year despite playing injured. Great spacial awareness but lacks a yard. Can run all day which Goodwin would like. Good size and decent mark. Change of scenery might pay dividends.

 

Without ever having seen him play, Balic has a bit of a Ben Newton/Viv Mitchie type feel about him.

Edited by Tough Kent
Grammatical error

3 hours ago, stevethemanjordan said:

In playing style? Or just the fact that he is similarly a high pick who can't get a regular game at the club who drafted him?

 

What about B Matera, do you have any thoughts on him?


2 hours ago, dee-tox said:

History of wrist problems going back to 2014 has not helped him.

Smart kid that showed plenty in draft year despite playing injured. Great spacial awareness but lacks a yard. Can run all day which Goodwin would like. Good size and decent mark. Change of scenery might pay dividends.

We can't afford small players that are slow & lack X.

They have to have weapons of some description.

So he's played a handful of games and wants to go home, yet his value has increased.

Makes perfect sense to me!

Good luck with that Freo!

15 minutes ago, DV8 said:

What about B Matera, do you have any thoughts on him?

Pretty sure he's keen to get home (WA).

I'm not sure he is what we need. If Kent got serious about his footy and had a big summer/lost weight and played to his potential then he could fill that role just as well. Hopefully Dion Johnson comes on a bit over the summer too.

Would rather give Motlop a shot as a FA. Is more versatile and dynamic and is a serious player when at the top of his game.

 

 

Edited by stevethemanjordan

 
  • Author
4 hours ago, stevethemanjordan said:

Would much rather Ben Lennon who I think is not too dissimilar, but has been in the system for a while and can't crack a game in Richmond's small forwardline.

1

I disagree. From what I've seen Lennon is an inferior player to Balic.

Lennon also appears out of contract this year and I suspect he'll be delisted. The only reason he'll be re-signed would be due to Richmond's initial investment of Pick No.12 in the 2013 National draft.

1 hour ago, stevethemanjordan said:

Pretty sure he's keen to get home (WA).

I'm not sure he is what we need. If Kent got serious about his footy and had a big summer/lost weight and played to his potential then he could fill that role just as well. Hopefully Dion Johnson comes on a bit over the summer too.

Would rather give Motlop a shot as a FA. Is more versatile and dynamic and is a serious player when at the top of his game.

 

 

Big IF's Steve.

If only watts would be Vanderhaar !

 

It's time to put a full stop in our list, of players recruited from 2012 or prior to; who still don't cut the mustard.

We need a page break from those attitudes & times, in our club.

I get the feeling the club is trying to remove players of less commitment, from our tribe.

So imo we don't want to bring in more like that, unless they are like a Stevie J scenario, whereby we could work with a proven consistent player. I don;'t trust motlop.

And the Cats are proven to be good developers of players with issues.

Motlop is a 'pass' for me.   As is Tippet.

If Matera was wanting out of the Suns, as long as he doesn't have a lot of baggage, I hope we talk to him before he makes a commitment.

We do need some quick mid/small forwards IMO. More than just Jeffy & Dion.

If they can win they're own footy & defend strongly, I think we could run 3 in a team

Edited by DV8


1 hour ago, DV8 said:

We can't afford small players that are slow & lack X.

They have to have weapons of some description.

 Melksham and ANB aren't fast and don't have a great amount of x factor and they thrived playing half forward this year. I'd see Balic as a similar player. 

Getting numbers to the contest, winning the ball and linking up with team mates in congestion then spreading out of it seems to be our playing style.

So whilst I'd love to only trade for guys who fill needs I don't think that's always going to happen and doubling down on the players who can play how you want to play isn't a bad idea. Especially if they're available at a cheap price.

20 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

6PR over here reporting that Balic to Melbourne FC looks likely. Fremantle are chasing a second round pick. 

I can't believe you listen to that station, Ethan.

I used to like you.

You're dead to me now.

Just now, McQueen said:

I can't believe you listen to that station, Ethan.

I used to like you.

You're dead to me now.

 I was scanning through the stations and just came across it, I swear. 

Freo must think a lot of him, he is not even listed on their site as a player at the club.


55 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

 I was scanning through the stations and just came across it, I swear. 

Yeah, see nobody believes you now Ethan............

 

You guys are really selling him :rolleyes:

BK ver 2.01. Mmmm mmm mmm

Where do we sign :mellow:

Trust the FD on this, especially as he trained with us as a junior. At the very least they must have all the inside info they need re fitness.

Always a tricky one these kinds of trades. Is it a case of unrealised potential - for any number of reasons - or is it a case of what you see is what you get? He'd be a third rounder at max (I hope!), so are the risks high/lower than an equivalent pick in the draft on an untried 18 year old?

4 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

 Melksham and ANB aren't fast and don't have a great amount of x factor and they thrived playing half forward this year. I'd see Balic as a similar player. 

Getting numbers to the contest, winning the ball and linking up with team mates in congestion then spreading out of it seems to be our playing style.

So whilst I'd love to only trade for guys who fill needs I don't think that's always going to happen and doubling down on the players who can play how you want to play isn't a bad idea. Especially if they're available at a cheap price.

Melksham & ANB are not what I mean by smallforward-mids.

I mean the Cyril's, the Garlett types.  The LeCras; more your specialist old fashioned rover/forward pocket. Dare I say Bartlett?

Those players who are quick, can turn on a sixpence, & kick off a step with accuracy. But must be able to run thru the midfield rotations.

I think Melksham is more half-forward wing type. Can run,  but I think he'd be lost starting deep forward.

ANB is another midfielder type who can be a defensive half-forwward. But I don't think he's quick.

We need to pick a small with speed who would be able to use that & his evasiveness to break open a play up forward. And then be able to go into the centre square setup and win footy.


55 minutes ago, DV8 said:

Melksham & ANB are not what I mean by smallforward-mids.

I mean the Cyril's, the Garlett types.  The LeCras; more your specialist old fashioned rover/forward pocket. Dare I say Bartlett

I swear I've seen Gaff handball !!

On 20/09/2017 at 12:46 PM, ignition. said:

I disagree. From what I've seen Lennon is an inferior player to Balic.

Lennon also appears out of contract this year and I suspect he'll be delisted. The only reason he'll be re-signed would be due to Richmond's initial investment of Pick No.12 in the 2013 National draft.

He'll be picked up. I imagine he'll seek a trade.

I'm not sure how Lennon is inferior to Balic given their similarities as players, their form at the lower levels and their wildly different draft positions.

Frankly I think that Lennon has found himself at a club who have opted to go with a different setup in the forward-line. I thought he showed a bit against Casey in the semi a few weeks ago. 

Regardless, I'm not saying we need him. Only that I'd rather him to Balic given their positions/playing styles.

Edited by stevethemanjordan

Recall seeing Balic star in an Under 18's Championship game. Thought he'd be a top 20 pick at the least. Just went back and looked at some of his highlights packages from 2015. There's nothing about his game that stands out in a positive way other than being an accumulator of the ball. But on the downside, either his problems with wrist injuries prevent him from tackling, or he is the worst tackler I have seen. Take at look at his highlights package for The Academy against the Allies:

 

Edited by mo64

 

- 0:05 clean take and dish off at pace
- 1:03 nice lead up and extension to the ball, double grabs the mark. Weights the kick in to the corridor
- 1:30 keeps his feet whilst gathering
- 1:58 nice finish for a goal
- 2:12 nice gather and slips a tackle to dish the handball
- 3:20 good run to receive and hit up
- 4:12 excellent smother and left foot finish 

After that I'd seen enough.

His tackling is bad, his kicking technique is a little funky. I'd want to see more to know if he's going to have the physicality required to be a regular player but promising WAFL stats are a decent sign he can mix it with men. But he's got really nice movement in tight, decent vision and seems solid over head.

If he's a strong runner and got some physicality I'd be happy with him as a depth half forward/midfielder with some upside. 

On 20/09/2017 at 8:01 AM, Deemented Are Go! said:

Image result for bag of chips

Prefer sailt and vinnie myself. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 06

    The Easter Round kicks off in style with a Thursday night showdown between Brisbane and Collingwood, as both sides look to solidify their spots inside the Top 4 early in the season. Good Friday brings a double-header, with Carlton out to claim consecutive wins when they face the struggling Kangaroos, while later that night the Eagles host the Bombers in Perth, still chasing their first victory of the year. Saturday features another marquee clash as the resurgent Crows look to rebound from back-to-back losses against a formidable GWS outfit. That evening, all eyes will be on Marvel Stadium where Damien Hardwick returns to face his old side—the Tigers—coaching the Suns at a ground he's never hidden his disdain for. Sunday offers two crucial contests where the prize is keeping touch with the Top 8. First, Sydney and Port Adelaide go head-to-head, followed by a fierce battle between the Bulldogs and the Saints. Then, Easter Monday delivers the traditional clash between two bitter rivals, both desperate for a win to stay in touch with the top end of the ladder. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons?

      • Thanks
    • 9 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Essendon

    What were they thinking? I mean by “they” the coaching panel and team selectors who chose the team to play against an opponent who, like Melbourne, had made a poor start to the season and who they appeared perfectly capable of beating in what was possibly the last chance to turn the season around.It’s no secret that the Demons’ forward line is totally dysfunctional, having opened the season barely able to average sixty points per game which means there has been no semblance of any system from the team going forward into attack. Nevertheless, on Saturday night at the Adelaide Oval in one of the Gather Round showcase games, Melbourne, with Max Gawn dominating the hit outs against a depleted Essendon ruck resulting from Nick Bryan’s early exit, finished just ahead in clearances won and found itself inside the 50 metre arc 51 times to 43. The end result was a final score that had the Bombers winning 15.6 (96) to 8.9 (57). On balance, one could expect this to result in a two or three goal win, but in this case, it translated into a six and a half goal defeat because they only managed to convert eight times or 11.68% of their entries. The Bombers more than doubled that. On Thursday night at the same ground, the losing team Adelaide managed to score 100 points from almost the same number of times inside 50.

      • Sad
      • Clap
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Thanks
    • 59 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 195 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 24 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Essendon

    Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

      • Vomit
      • Sad
      • Thanks
    • 271 replies
    Demonland