Jump to content

Shaun McKernan anyone?


ManDee

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, stuie said:

No mention of the rookie list and was said to be a "better FWD -Ruck option than Spencer" (who is on the main list in case you didn't know).

No one suggested putting him on the rookie list...

 

No one needed to mention the rookie list. We only have rookie spots left. 

Why are you talking about delisting someone?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, billy2803 said:

That was in relation to what I said in my previous quote.

Again, please highlight where I had a crack regarding the primary/rookie list options for any potential DFA's, as per your previous quoting of my post.

That's not what I said you did. I just said you had a crack, you clearly did. Don't try and move the goal posts now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Night Crawler said:

No one needed to mention the rookie list. We only have rookie spots left. 

Why are you talking about delisting someone?

FMD. Just read champ...

 

8 hours ago, ManDee said:

Just delisted by EFC, is he a better FWD -Ruck option than Spencer? 

196cm    99kg  Born  01/09/1990

Season 2016 Totals/Averages
 
  GM K HB D M G B T HO FF FA AF * SC *
 Total 6 44 21 65 20 4 1 8 41 4 7 315 306
 Average 6 7.3 3.5 10.8 3.3 0.7 0.2 1.3 6.8 0.7 1.2 52.5 51.0

Stats -Footywire

 

8 hours ago, stuie said:

We only have space for rookies now don't we? Can't see us taking a 26 year old in the draft.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, stuie said:

We only have space for rookies now don't we? Can't see us taking a 26 year old in the draft.

 

So you were uncertain if we had main list spots available? My god. I thought everyone on here would have a basic understanding of how many spots on the list we had left.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, stuie said:

That's not what I said you did. I just said you had a crack, you clearly did. Don't try and move the goal posts now.

 

You quoted my post about primary and rookie lists, then accused me of having a crack. There is absolutely nowhere in my post that you quoted that I was having a crack at you.

And you reckon I'm changing the goal posts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


10 hours ago, Night Crawler said:

So you were uncertain if we had main list spots available? My god. I thought everyone on here would have a basic understanding of how many spots on the list we had left.

 

 

Lol the misquoting is getting worse... You don't see how me asking that was leading the OP to understand the list situation?

Wow.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, stuie said:

Lol the misquoting is getting worse... You don't see how me asking that was leading the OP to understand the list situation?

Wow.

 

Stuart, the OP actually asked what peoples opinions of him were, specifically comparing him to Spencer.  ManDee was not saying that we should give him a place on the primary list.  Here is what ManDee asked;

"Just delisted by EFC, is he a better FWD -Ruck option than Spencer?"

Most people that have replied, yourself included, have indicated that if they would bring him in, that the rookie list would be the main and/or only way we would do this.  It's just that you took it that step/s further (shock horror) and implied that because Spencer was on our Primary List, that if we are looking at someone as an upgrade on him, that they would naturally have to go on the Primary List too (your post #22).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes from me as a rookie spot. Could be interesting to see how he goes as a FB and take on the the big guys like Hawkins, Walker and Tippet. Also gives us insurance if one of the McDonald's go down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, stuie said:

No mention of the rookie list and was said to be a "better FWD -Ruck option than Spencer" (who is on the main list in case you didn't know).

No one suggested putting him on the rookie list...

 

And Stuart, just to further confirm what a majority of posters think, you have stated the above in you post #22 that "no one suggested putting him on the rookie list".  You only had to scroll up to my post #19, which, for your benefit, I have quoted below...

12 hours ago, billy2803 said:

We have spots available on the rookie list if it were decided that we would look at any DFA, so no need to delist anyone, Stuart.

Personally, I think there is zero chance that they would be looking at any of the DFAs for any spot on our primary list (as I think we have made all the changes we want to make), or the rookie list (as I think they will try their luck with a couple of project players that aren't "proven" at AFL level.

And when you were scrolling up, you would've gone past CBDees post #20 (the very next one following my above one), where he/she stated;

"None if we rookie him. We only have two live picks (47&69) in the main draft after promoting Wagner but we have rookie pics."

You accuse others of misquoting.  You accuse others of changing the goal posts.  It is truly baffling.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he would be worth a rookie spot, mainly as insurance but he may have some upside. I think he could do the FWD/Ruck role better than Spencer and perhaps better then Pedo.

As a rookie who could we get to fill that FWD/Ruck role that is better than McKernan? So for me it is a yes. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, billy2803 said:

Stuart, the OP actually asked what peoples opinions of him were, specifically comparing him to Spencer.  ManDee was not saying that we should give him a place on the primary list.  Here is what ManDee asked;

"Just delisted by EFC, is he a better FWD -Ruck option than Spencer?"

Most people that have replied, yourself included, have indicated that if they would bring him in, that the rookie list would be the main and/or only way we would do this.  It's just that you took it that step/s further (shock horror) and implied that because Spencer was on our Primary List, that if we are looking at someone as an upgrade on him, that they would naturally have to go on the Primary List too (your post #22).

 

12 minutes ago, billy2803 said:

And Stuart, just to further confirm what a majority of posters think, you have stated the above in you post #22 that "no one suggested putting him on the rookie list".  You only had to scroll up to my post #19, which, for your benefit, I have quoted below...

And when you were scrolling up, you would've gone past CBDees post #20 (the very next one following my above one), where he/she stated;

"None if we rookie him. We only have two live picks (47&69) in the main draft after promoting Wagner but we have rookie pics."

You accuse others of misquoting.  You accuse others of changing the goal posts.  It is truly baffling.

 

19 hours ago, stuie said:

We only have space for rookies now don't we? Can't see us taking a 26 year old in the draft.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

But that's assuming we don't think some combination of Watts or Weideman can do that job for us in the short to medium term. And it doesn't help us find the long term solution either.

Don't forget Jordan Lewis bringing those 3rd man up skills over to us. Should add a new dimension to our midfield rucking stocks.

Edited by DominatrixTyson
Link to comment
Share on other sites


16 minutes ago, jeck wartz said:

Ha! Stu's recruiting team have suggested to the club that we should recruit Josh Green and Shaun Mckernan to the club to boost our "superstar factor."

why do we need threads about players we're never going to recruit in a million years?

Jeck, do we need a FWD/Ruck?

If yes, who is available? 

If no, you are at odds with the FD and most supporters.

Sorry to post a thread about a player that may fit a need at our club.  And to answer your question, we have threads because we love our club and we want it to improve, we like to talk to like minded supporters and to argue about what is best for our club. Also sorry to have an opinion. Please ignore threads that you don't like and don't impose your negativity.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ManDee said:

Jeck, do we need a FWD/Ruck?

If yes, who is available? 

If no, you are at odds with the FD and most supporters.

Sorry to post a thread about a player that may fit a need at our club.  And to answer your question, we have threads because we love our club and we want it to improve, we like to talk to like minded supporters and to argue about what is best for our club. Also sorry to have an opinion. Please ignore threads that you don't like and don't impose your negativity.

 

 

We need a player who plays that position, but an AFL standard one. 

surely there has to be some sort of filter though, we have no spots for a DFA so it's not going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Jesus Hoganshaw said:

Unlike what stuie keeps suggesting, we're very unlikely to put any DFAs on the primary list.

I haven't suggested that once, in fact I've been the one pointing out the list spaces. But nice attempt at trolling champ.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jeck wartz said:

Let me get this straight...

I have a different opinion so i am a troll now?

who were you planning on getting rid of to make room for these players Stu?

To be fair to Stuart, he did belt us with the "Green on the Rookie List" line ad nauseam in that other thread, so there wouldn't be a need to delist anyone.  Green would need to nominate for the Rookie Draft though for us to get him that way.

My concern about parking a DFA like Green (or McKernan, et al) on the rookie list is that we could be using that spot to develop an untried, speculative pick, similar to what we did with Wagner, AvB, etc (I could've gone back to the likes of Jurrah, Flash, etc, but wanted to keep it recent).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    REDEEMING by Meggs

    It was such a balmy spring evening for this mid-week BNCA Pink Lady match at our favourite venue Ikon Park between two teams that had not won a game since round one.   After last week’s insipid bombing, the DeeArmy banner correctly deemanded that our players ‘go in hard, go in strong, go in fighting’, and girl they sure did!   The first quarter goals by Alyssa Bannan and Alyssia Pisano were simply stunning, and it was 4 goals to nil by half-time.   Kudos to Mick Stinear.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    REDEEM by Meggs

    How will Mick Stinear and his dwindling list of fit and available Demons respond to last week’s 65-point capitulation to the Bombers, the team’s biggest loss in history?   As a minimum he will expect genuine effort from all of his players when Melbourne takes on the GWS Giants at Ikon Park this Thursday.  Happily, the ground remains a favourite Melbourne venue of players and spectators alike and will provide an opportunity for the Demons to redeem themselves. Injuries to star play

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    EASYBEATS by Meggs

    A beautiful sunny Friday afternoon, with a light breeze and a strong Windy Hill crowd set the scene, inviting one team to seize the day and take the important four points on offer. For the Demons it was not a good Friday, easily beaten by an all-time largest losing margin of 65 points.   Essendon threw themselves into action today, winning most of the contests and had three early goals with Daria Bannister on fire.  In contrast the Demons were dropping marks, hesitant in close and comm

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 9

    DEFUSE THE BOMBERS by Meggs

    Last Saturday’s crushing loss to Fremantle, after being three goals ahead at three quarter time, should be motivation enough to bounce back for this very winnable Round 5 clash at Windy Hill. A first-time venue for the Melbourne AFLW team, this should be a familiar suburban, windy, footy environment for the players.   Essendon were brave and competitive last week against ladder leader Adelaide at Sturt’s home ground. A familiar name, Maddison Gay, was the Bombers best player with

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 33

    BLOW THE SIREN by Meggs

    Fremantle hosted the Demons on a sunny 20-degree Saturdayafternoon winning the toss and electing to defend in the first quarter against the 3-goal breeze favouring the Parry Street end. There was method here, as this would give the comeback queens, the Dockers, last use of the breeze. The Melbourne Coach had promised an improved performance, and we did start better than previous weeks, winning the ball out of the middle, using the breeze advantage and connecting to the forwards. 

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    GETAWAY by Meggs

    Calling all fit players. Expect every available Melbourne player to board the Virgin cross-continent flight to Perth for this Round 4 clash on Saturday afternoon at Fremantle Oval. It promises to be keenly contested, though Fremantle is the bookies clear favourite.  If we lose, finals could be remoter than Rottnest Island especially following on from the Dees 50-point dismantlement by North Melbourne last Sunday.  There are 8 remaining matches, over the next 7 weeks.  To Meggs’

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    DRUBBING by Meggs

    With Casey Fields basking in sunshine, an enthusiastic throng of young Demons fans formed a guard of honour for the evergreen and much admired 75-gamer Paxy Paxman. As the home team ran out to play, Paxy’s banner promised that the Demons would bounce back from last week’s loss to Brisbane and reign supreme.   Disappointingly, the Kangaroos dominated the match to win by 50 points, but our Paxy certainly did her bit.  She was clearly our best player, sweeping well in defence.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 4

    GARNER STRENGTH by Meggs

    In keeping with our tough draw theme, Week 3 sees Melbourne take on flag favourites, North Melbourne, at Casey Fields this Sunday at 1:05pm.  The weather forecast looks dry, a coolish 14 degrees and will be characteristically gusty.  Remember when Casey Fields was considered our fortress?  The Demons have lost two of their past three matches at the Field of Dreams, so opposition teams commute down the Princes Highway with more optimism these days.  The Dees held the highe

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 1

    ALLY’S FIELDS by Meggs

    It was a sunny morning at Casey Fields, as Demon supporters young and old formed a guard of honour for fan favourite and 50-gamer Alyssa Bannan.  Banno’s banner stated the speedster was the ‘fastest 50 games’ by an AFLW player ever.   For Dees supporters, today was not our day and unfortunately not for Banno either. A couple of opportunities emerged for our number 6 but alas there was no sizzle.   Brisbane atoned for last week’s record loss to North Melbourne, comprehensively out

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 1
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...