Tim Smith gets his fifth.

Tigers respond - there's one point in it.

Tigers lead by 4 points. They have kicked four of the last five goals.

Edited July 3, 20169 yr by KC from Casey

Scottie goals. Casey back in front.

How old is Tim Smith? Seems unlucky to have never been drafted

Cmon Scorps!

Casey wins by 2 points.

Peter Jackson VFL 2016

Casey Scorpions   3.3.21 6.6.42 9.9.63 11.12.78

Richmond 2.2.14 6.3.39 9.9.63 11.10.76

Goals 

Casey Scorpions Smith 5 Hulett Scott 2 Neal-Bullen Weideman 

Richmond Castagna 3 McBean 2  Aarts  Bathie Butler Mellington Moore Silvestro

Best

Casey Scorpions T Smith Grimes Michie Neal-Bullen Brayshaw Morris

Richmond Castagna Silvestro Moore Markov Rioli Drummond

1 hour ago, KC from Casey said:

Casey wins by 2 points.

Robbo just said on the MCG screen that it was 1 point.

2 minutes ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Robbo just said on the MCG screen that it was 1 point.

He's wrong.

 

So, who won...?????

 

Casey.

11.12.78 to 11.10.76.

FT Stats Disposals - Michie 31, Grimes 29, Neal-Bullen 27, Oliver 24, Brayshaw 22 Goals - Smith 5, Scott, Hulett 2, Neal-Bullen, Weideman.

5 minutes ago, Vagg said:

So, who won...?????

 

Casey 11.12 beat Richmond 11.10

Casey 11.12.78

Richmond 11.10.76

FT Stats Disposals - Michie 31, Grimes 29, Neal-Bullen 27, Oliver 24, Brayshaw 22 Goals - Smith 5, Scott, Hulett 2, Neal-Bullen, Weideman.

Great result for the Scorps.

I saw the second quarter before the main game. 5 quarters is lousy maths but great value.

Bummer about the result of the second game.

Get Hulett in for Dawes

Grimes in the best again. I command his motivation to keep giving a sh!t

24 minutes ago, Jaded said:

Grimes in the best again. I command his motivation to keep giving a sh!t

Either you meant "commend" or you have more influence than I thought.

Neal-Bullen is just a player. 

The sooner Brayshaw and Oliver replace Jones and Bugg the better. 

I like ANB, but get the feeling I'm going to have to agree. But sometimes kids with his character can surprise.

1 hour ago, Demon Disciple said:

Get Hulett in for Dawes

Get anyone in for Dawes

1 hour ago, Jaded said:

Grimes in the best again. I command his motivation to keep giving a sh!t

He is a better player than five who played in the seniors today.

For God sake play him in the seniors

4 minutes ago, old dee said:

Get anyone in for Dawes

Yep, Dawes was hopeless today, either Hulett or Weiderman need to get their first next week

1 hour ago, ProDee said:

Neal-Bullen is just a player. 

The sooner Brayshaw and Oliver replace Jones and Bugg the better. 

A couple of underdone inside mids playing on the wing isn't going to solve anything.

Vanders and Ben Kennedy might make way for those 2 in the next few weeks, but we played as well as we have all year today due to having a fit team capable of running with a top opponent. There's a reason for that.

I wonder if the footy department will consider Brayshaw for half back. Harmes was good there today but could go back on a wing. Half back might be the best thing for Brayshaw's develop in the next 8 weeks, I'd love to see it.

2 hours ago, Demon Disciple said:

Get Hulett in for Dawes

And anyone in for Frost....he is off AFL by a long way at the moment. We are one man down in defence when he plays and one man down with Dawes in as well. Dawes looks ok when playing against ordinary sides like the Pies (at the moment) which lulls some (including me at times) into thinking he offers us something.

Who do we bring in for Frost down back? When is H back?

Grimes for Ben Ken? BK mostly an outside player but pretty bad disposal so isn't giving us much when he does get it.  Some might say Grimes is as bad but he gets more contested stuff and more versatile.

Edited July 3, 20169 yr by Rusty Nails

31 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

A couple of underdone inside mids playing on the wing isn't going to solve anything.

Vanders and Ben Kennedy might make way for those 2 in the next few weeks, but we played as well as we have all year today due to having a fit team capable of running with a top opponent. There's a reason for that.

I wonder if the footy department will consider Brayshaw for half back. Harmes was good there today but could go back on a wing. Half back might be the best thing for Brayshaw's develop in the next 8 weeks, I'd love to see it.

Clearly (perhaps not)  I'm referring to them developing into the players we know they'll become. 

I'm not referring to next week or the rest of the year. 

Edited July 3, 20169 yr by ProDee