Thought I'd give it it's own thread.

Jeremy Cameron reported for a head high bump on Brisbane's Mathieson.

I have watched the replay a fair few times now and JC is in trouble I think!

Left the ground, chose to bump when he had ample time to tackle, and made head high contact.

Mathieson was dazed and took a while to get up with some help from the trainers.

Cameron has a history of this sort of stuff and I am calling a definite ONE WEEK SUSPENSION!

Thoughts?

GWS player.

Nothing to see. Look away.

I haven't viewed the footage but I hope that you are right.

Just now, Whispering_Jack said:

GWS player.

Nothing to see. Look away.

Regardless of the incestuous love affair we are all aware of, it is a week for sure!

History of this sort of thing.

1 week to teach him a lesson.

Seriously? How can it not be one week?

If it was Viney it would be minimum 2

 

Didn't see the incident but Mathieson didnt come back onto the ground after they took him off. That doesn't bode well for Jezza's defence.

My left nut will gladly go on the line for this one....

Guaranteed ONE week!

I would really like to see the replay in slo mo to see if his feet left the ground. He definitely hit the head and knocked Mathieson over. If the AFL considers the head sacrosanct then it's a week at least.

1 minute ago, Whispering_Jack said:

I would really like to see the replay in slo mo to see if his feet left the ground. He definitely hit the head and knocked Mathieson over. If the AFL considers the head sacrosanct then it's a week at least.

Interesting - when I viewed it I was sure he left the ground but doubted he hit his head.  Eventually I decided he did both, but slow-mo needed to be sure.

Hard to see how he can avoid a week when Mathieson left the ground from a head hit but consistency hasn't been a trademark of the tribunal.

Possible fractured cheekbone. See ya

He is gone! 

1 hour ago, Whispering_Jack said:

I would really like to see the replay in slo mo to see if his feet left the ground. He definitely hit the head and knocked Mathieson over. If the AFL considers the head sacrosanct then it's a week at least.

He absolutely did leave the ground.

Regardless, though, it was off the ball and he has no defence of "no reasonable alternative". He elected to bump, made contact to the head, potentially severe contact too. This is the kind of act that, if you stuff it up, you deserve to miss games for. 

At least one week.

Left the ground, medium impact, not in the play, super late

normally 3 weeks down to 2 with early plea

GWS player so he'll play round 1

He has to get at least a week. The AFL are a bunch of cheating bastards if he doesn't.

6 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

He has to get at least a week. The AFL are a bunch of cheating bastards if he doesn't.

Rhetorical ET?

23 minutes ago, Peter Griffen said:

Left the ground, medium impact, not in the play, super late

normally 3 weeks down to 2 with early plea

GWS player so he'll play round 1

Not only will Cameron play in round 1 but the field umpire who reported him will be officiating in the seconds at Nar Nar Goon.

How many weeks for Pedo?

in his defence the St Kilda player wasn't injured.

2 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

He has to get at least a week. The AFL are a bunch of cheating bastards if he doesn't.

so you reckon he will get off, ethan>

3 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

How many weeks for Pedo?

in his defence the St Kilda player wasn't injured.

None, he clipped his shoulder. 

7 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

None, he clipped his shoulder. 

Fair enough.

At the ground they replayed it a couple of times and it looked like he got him in the head.

handy

looked at the replay and paused it several times.

Mathieson hand-balled it and the ball was about 15 m away when Cameron left the ground to hit him with his shoulder to the side of his head.

He wasn't even concerned where the ball was.

So high contact, avoidable medium / high intensity, i guess we find more when we get the results of the scans.

Min. 1 week - 3weeks

Coach Cameron thought he was in the action of smothering. good one. the ball was 15m away.

Edited March 13, 20169 yr by Barney Rubble

Our minset should cease being reactionary to potential omissions and more focused on our own latent potential irrespective.

4 minutes ago, Tessaract said:

Our minset should cease being reactionary to potential omissions and more focused on our own latent potential irrespective.

WTF?

4 minutes ago, Tessaract said:

Our minset should cease being reactionary to potential omissions and more focused on our own latent potential irrespective.

Ok, sure, but 'latent potential irrespective' aside - we can discuss the team we play possibly losing its FF...