Jump to content

Featured Replies

it doesn't make sense comparing Cotchin to Jones - very different types of players. In terms of value to his side on a week to week basis I'd choose Chunk any day of the week.

 
13 minutes ago, ProDee said:

Cotchin has his faults but is a vastly superior player.

 

2 hours ago, ProDee said:

Cotchin is a B+ footballer and Jones is a B+ footballer.  There's not a lot in it, but there's enough evidence on talent and stats for me to conclude one is better than the other.  

:)

On the same page too.

Over their careers, Cotchin gets the nod. We're talking about present day, assumedly.  Right now I'm picking Jones and it's not a difficult choice.

 
2 hours ago, Curry & Beer said:

Hogan is a once-in-a-generation freak. That's why he is the only name you can come up.

Kidding yourself

Tom McDonald was also getting big wraps in the first half of last year and his name was being thrown up as an early contender for AA, as his form dropped away so did the discussion surrounding him. 

Kidding myself about Jones at Hawthorn?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38 minutes ago, P-man said:

 

:)

On the same page too.

He's had a vastly superior career and he's certainly more talented.

Right now they're on about par, which is why they've got the same present rating.  I'd still have Cotchin ahead.

Hope that helps.

 


4 minutes ago, ProDee said:

He's had a vastly superior career and he's certainly more talented.

Right now they're on about par, which is why they've got the same present rating.  I'd still have Cotchin ahead.

Hope that helps.

 

Hehe..nice attempt to save face. 5/10.

You never have been one to shy away from the grand statement. That is what got you in hot water on the subject of this thread if I recall... :)

The comparison right now is of slightly more interest to who you'd pick in 2012. Hence why 2014 is a reasonable means of comparison, given what we now know about Jones' injury affected 2015.

Anyway, back to Oliver.

1 minute ago, old dee said:

I could have sworn this was a tread about Clayton Oliver

Cotchin is better than Oliver

 

?

 

 

 
1 hour ago, Bombay Airconditioning said:

Tom McDonald was also getting big wraps in the first half of last year and his name was being thrown up as an early contender for AA, as his form dropped away so did the discussion surrounding him. 

Kidding myself about Jones at Hawthorn?

The fact you are arguing with me implies that your position is that Melbourne players get a proportionate amount of praise in the media as the 'big' clubs' players do. I doubt there is one person here that agrees with you.

Whilst I understand Oliver's skill sets being compared to Dangerfield, I think he may evolve into something more like Mark Ricciuto...with a little more poise.

Can you imagine??

I genuinely feel we have the makings of the midfield we've been waiting for;

Oliver

Brayshaw

Petracca

Viney

Tyson

Salem

VDB

Yes we've been down this road before, but this is different. They're each clean / polished / ferocious / unrelenting / driven / thrive on the contest / love body contact - and THAT is something we haven't had.

They're coming through together and will be driving the momentum shift, all with a reasonable target to kick to and an emerging mobile tap ruckman.

I can smell it.

 

 

 


1 hour ago, Lace Out said:

Whilst I understand Oliver's skill sets being compared to Dangerfield, I think he may evolve into something more like Mark Ricciuto...with a little more poise.

Can you imagine??

I genuinely feel we have the makings of the midfield we've been waiting for;

 

Oliver

Brayshaw

Petracca

Viney

Tyson

Salem

VDB

Yes we've been down this road before, but this is different. They're each clean / polished / ferocious / unrelenting / driven / thrive on the contest / love body contact - and THAT is something we haven't had.

They're coming through together and will be driving the momentum shift, all with a reasonable target to kick to and an emerging mobile tap ruckman.

I can smell it.

While I love the look of that, I must admit that I was almost as excited by

Scully

Trengove

Morton

Gysberts

Tapscott

Maric

Jones

Strauss (for a very short time)

 

God, what a bloody awful group of players.

11 minutes ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Please keep on topic folks - this thread is about Clayton Oliver.

Thanks

This thread will continue to veer off in various directions, until we have seen him play. Annoying as it is, nobody can give informed comment yet, therefore the conversation gets sidetracked easily.

 

 

1 hour ago, Lace Out said:

I think he may evolve into something more like Mark Ricciuto...with a little more poise.

 

 

 

An improved version of Mark Ricciuto? Nice to see someone with some realistic expectations on the young kid.

1 hour ago, Lace Out said:

Whilst I understand Oliver's skill sets being compared to Dangerfield, I think he may evolve into something more like Mark Ricciuto...with a little more poise.

Can you imagine??

I genuinely feel we have the makings of the midfield we've been waiting for;

 

Oliver

Brayshaw

Petracca

Viney

Tyson

Salem

VDB

Yes we've been down this road before, but this is different. They're each clean / polished / ferocious / unrelenting / driven / thrive on the contest / love body contact - and THAT is something we haven't had.

They're coming through together and will be driving the momentum shift, all with a reasonable target to kick to and an emerging mobile tap ruckman.

I can smell it.

 

 

 

Let's not get ahead of ourselves. I'd hope that he's half as good as Riccuito tbh (who was a great footballer and leader) Let's remember, like Petracca, he's yet to get a kick.

 


34 minutes ago, Forest Demon said:

An improved version of Mark Ricciuto? Nice to see someone with some realistic expectations on the young kid.

Ricciuto only got eight all-australian guernseys. Lightweight.

1 hour ago, faultydet said:

While I love the look of that, I must admit that I was almost as excited by

 

Scully

Trengove

Morton

Gysberts

Tapscott

Maric

Jones

Strauss (for a very short time)

 

God, what a bloody awful group of players.

That's what tempers my excitement too - add to your group Jurrah, Watts, McKenzie and Frawley.. we certainly looked like we had the cattle about 5 years ago... we certainly didn't though

8 minutes ago, Curry & Beer said:

That's what tempers my excitement too - add to your group Jurrah, Watts, McKenzie and Frawley.. we certainly looked like we had the cattle about 5 years ago... we certainly didn't though

4 competitive types in that whole list, and none of them a maniac like Viney.

Oliver (by reputation) certainly signals a continuation of a very un-Melbourne direction. I hope he is as crazy at the ball as we have heard. Madmen with skill, win finals.

 

Wouldnt we all love to see a winning final again?

3 hours ago, Lace Out said:

Whilst I understand Oliver's skill sets being compared to Dangerfield, I think he may evolve into something more like Mark Ricciuto...with a little more poise.

Can you imagine??

I genuinely feel we have the makings of the midfield we've been waiting for;

 

Oliver

Brayshaw

Petracca

Viney

Tyson

Salem

VDB

Yes we've been down this road before, but this is different. They're each clean / polished / ferocious / unrelenting / driven / thrive on the contest / love body contact - and THAT is something we haven't had.

They're coming through together and will be driving the momentum shift, all with a reasonable target to kick to and an emerging mobile tap ruckman.

I can smell it.

 

 

 

 

2 hours ago, faultydet said:

While I love the look of that, I must admit that I was almost as excited by

 

Scully

Trengove

Morton

Gysberts

Tapscott

Maric

Jones

Strauss (for a very short time)

 

God, what a bloody awful group of players.

I would say that Brayshaw, Viney, Tyson, VDB & Salem have already surpassed those on that list with the exception of Trenners who we can hopefully add to the new list with Oliver & Petracca.

We're already ahead of where we were and moving further forward...


I cannot wait to see him play, he seems to have poise that even when facing someone tackling him, he has time to side step, or the strength to still get the ball away. He seems to like to move the ball on quickly and not afraid to tackle and appears hungry for the ball. All excellent attributed that we have lacked in some of our previous mid fielders.

9 hours ago, The Song Formerly Known As said:

sooo... Clayton anyone?

Oliver.jpg

The One thing I noticed startingly was his turn of speed with the ball through heavy traffic! My esteemed Colleague Dazzle man also noticed this!  In many of my vids of "Sir Robert" one thing stood as stark reminder of class and that was the ability to see peripherally those around you and decide in a blink of an eye which way to weave to esape heavy scrutiny from opposition! Probably why Rob lasted so long in the more brutal era's with not too much body damage!

Oliver has I believe, the same 'Uncanny Time" and if he matures as I expect him to will become One of the "Darlings" of the MFC young brigade! 

Bring it on Son!!

Edited by picket fence

3 hours ago, Forest Demon said:

An improved version of Mark Ricciuto? Nice to see someone with some realistic expectations on the young kid.

I mean't that I believe his style of play will be more inside grunt and physically hurting opponents like we saw in Ricciuto, than the tear away pace from a stoppage or forward of the play we see from Dangerfield.

He has poise which is rare for someone so physical.

Ricciuto is one of my all time no Melbourne players and I think Clayton's 'style' may be similar, or, more comparable than Dangerfield.

 
8 hours ago, faultydet said:

Cotchin is better than Oliver

?

For now. 

4 hours ago, Tessaract said:

I think he might be special..

large_1urksxoctgz0xvqs9l4hytp4dfm.jpg

Love that film.  Vastly underrated. 

6 hours ago, faultydet said:

While I love the look of that, I must admit that I was almost as excited by

 

Scully

Trengove

Morton

Gysberts

Tapscott

Maric

Jones

Strauss (for a very short time)

 

God, what a bloody awful group of players.

Amen bar Jones & Trengove


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 404 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies