beelzebub 23,392 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 So you could use pick 100, 118 and use pick 3 for Parish out worst case?yep
Guest Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Apparently Kennedy, 29 and 50 for Toumpas and Howe. At least buy us dinner first. You [censored] morons, Melbourne.
Mach5 4,768 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 If the deal is dragging out, it will be us dragging out because the others are trying to fleece us...
watchtheeyes 1,429 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Apparently Kennedy, 29 and 50 for Toumpas and Howe. At least buy us dinner first. You [censored] morons, Melbourne. Where exactly are you getting that information from?
praha 11,267 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Port + Toumpas, pick 32 - pick 29, 50 and 68 Melbourne + Kennedy, pick 29 and 50 - Toumpas, Howe Collingwood + Howe, pick 68 - Kennedy, Seedsman Adelaide + Seedmans - Pick 32
MadAsHell 4,217 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Apparently Kennedy, 29 and 50 for Toumpas and Howe. At least buy us dinner first. You [censored] morons, Melbourne. Someone please explain how this deal comes close to the bench mark of the Gold Coast deal?
Guest Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Port get Toumpas and 32 for 29, 50 and 68. This is absolutely [censored] ridiculous.
DSP 1,488 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Port + Toumpas, pick 32 - pick 29, 50 and 68 Melbourne + Kennedy, pick 29 and 50 - Toumpas, Howe Collingwood + Howe, pick 68 - Kennedy, Seedsman Adelaide + Seedmans - Pick 32 Absolutely horrid deal for us. I certainly hope someone at MFC grows a pair and rebukes that deal.
watchtheeyes 1,429 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 I can't believe that is true, surely not
Guest Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 So you don't want a last day trade of Lamumba + 2nd round for Varcoe? /s I would be happy never to trade with Collingwood again - I would rather lose a player in the draft. Liverpool refuse to trade with Man U for a very good reason, why help make the )*#$)#( stronger.
MadAsHell 4,217 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Port + Toumpas, pick 32 - pick 29, 50 and 68 Melbourne + Kennedy, pick 29 and 50 - Toumpas, Howe Collingwood + Howe, pick 68 - Kennedy, Seedsman Adelaide + Seedmans - Pick 32 Don't have the points table with me, but what does picks 29, 46 and 50 equal for points? Pick 8, or at the very least 14?
mo64 5,910 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Basically Toumpas is steak knives to the deal. Howe for Kennedy and 29 is fair. Toumpas for pick 50.
markc 975 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Port + Toumpas, pick 32 - pick 29, 50 and 68 Melbourne + Kennedy, pick 29 and 50 - Toumpas, Howe Collingwood + Howe, pick 68 - Kennedy, Seedsman Adelaide + Seedmans - Pick 32 even here from LA that is crap , why would port get 32 back , just dropping 3 places ? doesn't seem right
Ethan Tremblay 31,388 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 All the best to the Toump. Eat a big fat one Howe.
hells bells 2,023 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 That doesn't seem very good for us to put it mildly, and I fail to see how it will allow anything 'special' to happen with academy draft picks.
watchtheeyes 1,429 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Basically Toumpas is steak knives to the deal. Howe for Kennedy and 29 is fair. Toumpas for pick 50. Toumpas is worth a sh!tload more than pick 50!
H_T 3,049 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Sounding quite desperate there H_T... lol. Well they do call themselves Trade Radio, and it barely rated a mention in their last half hour.
mrtwister 652 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 So essentially PA got Toumpas for picks 50 and 68 and we straight swapped Howe for Kennedy and got picks 29 and 50 for Toumpas. Okaaaaaayyy
rpfc 29,020 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Well, I am disappointed; that seems a fair deal... Toumpas for Kennedy, and Howe for 29 and 50 is value in my eyes but not compared to what we were going to get from GC. (Sigh) Hopefully they are chips for something bigger...
dazzledavey36 56,283 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 I hope this is seriously just a pisstake. Absolutely fuming right now.
Guest Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 So in summary, our trade period has been a four pick downgrade in the second round, Toumpas and Howe for Melksham and Kennedy. Absolutely brilliant stuff.
Dee-licious 1,954 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 We got killed in this deal. What an absolute shambles of a trade week! Collingwood lost Seedman and Kennedy for Howe and 68 (win) Port romped it home. Adelaide only cost them pick 32 for Seedman. WHY THE HELL DIDNT WE GET 29 and 32! Why didnt we get Collingwood's second rounder?
rjay 25,424 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Tomlinson is very underrated. Would be very happy to see him in the red and blue. Would be a mini coup if it did happen as he is relatively entrenched in the GWS fold. He's in talks with Carlton & St Kilda so not that entrenched.
MadAsHell 4,217 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Kennedy & Pick 29 for Howe is fair value i think. Pick 50 for Toumpas given some of the form he started to show this year is a massive rip off!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.