Jump to content

Vacant Player Numbers

Featured Replies

Posted

Here is the current list with their numbers.

1 Jesse Hogan 2 Nathan Jones 4 Jack Watts 5 Jimmy Toumpas 6 Chris Dawes 7 Jack Viney 8 James Frawley 9 Jack Trengove 10 Shannon Byrnes 11 Mitch Clark 13 Jordie McKenzie 14 Lynden Dunn 17 Sam Blease 19 James Strauss 20 Colin Garland 21 Cameron Pedersen 22 James Magner 25 Tom McDonald 26 Daniel Nicholson 31 Jack Grimes 32 Michael Evans 33 Dom Barry 34 Dean Kent 35 Luke Tapscott 37 Max Gawn 38 Jeremy Howe 39 Neville Jetta 40 Mark Jamar 42 Jake Spencer 43 Rory Taggert 44 Rohan Bail 45 Matt Jones 46 Dean Terlich 48 Jack Fitzpatrick 49 Nathan Stark 50 Mitchell Clisby Dom Tyson Bernie Vince Viv Michie

We have 3 new players.

The following numbers are vacant:

3, 12, 15, 16, 18, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30, 36, 41, 47

What numbers would you like to see the new comers get? Are there any vacant numbers that you would like to reserve?

 
 
  • Author

Isn't Hogan number 1?

Forgot about the Hoges. I think he is #1.

I got the list off the MFC website and they have already taken Colin off the list. When does Hoges officially become a Demon?

Forgot about the Hoges. I think he is #1.

I got the list off the MFC website and they have already taken Colin off the list. When does Hoges officially become a Demon?

I suppose after second list lodgement. He may already be classed as on the list though, as he played NAB cup last year and was listed in the record.


 

I think a few players will graduate to lower numbers......Fitz, Terlich, Matty Jones, Taggert, Spence....

Then the new fellas will get whats left over

Vince.....12

Michie....16

Tyson.....18

Pick No.9.15

My guess anyway FWIW....

how about #69?

To which Mrs. Wong replied

"if you think I'm going to get out of bed at this time of night to go and make Lemon batter Chicken then you're mistaken"


I think a few players will graduate to lower numbers......Fitz, Terlich, Matty Jones, Taggert, Spence....

Oh no. Not this again...

Oh no. Not this again...

Agree wholeheartedly.

Numbers mean nothing.

(But Fitzy looks great in #48 - the only improvement would be #1, elongated all the way down his back from neck to tuck in, to make him look even taller and lankier, but that is taken.)

I'm thinking Tyson will keep #29

If you watch the videos he wore 29 during the tac cup and also for GWS....we have #29 free at the moment...so why not keep him in 29.

Oh no. Not this again...

they should put all the numbers in a big barrel and all players (new and old) pick a new number

just takin da pizza :)


they should put all the numbers in a big barrel and all players (new and old) pick a new number

just takin da pizza :)

BINGO!

So how much do I win?

From the available numbers only Tyson has a number that he was wearing from his last club at 29

Bernie Vince did start wearing 28 for the Crows

We still may have a delisting or 2 yet though

Would be fitting that Vince gets 12 and Tyson gets 3

Agree wholeheartedly.

Numbers mean nothing.

(But Fitzy looks great in #48 - the only improvement would be #1, elongated all the way down his back from neck to tuck in, to make him look even taller and lankier, but that is taken.)

I strongly disagree

If numbers meant nothing then why would Grimes wear 31 , Watts wear 4 , Trengove 9 and so on

You might not think so but the Club obviously does

17 at the Tigers

3 at the Dogs

14 at the Swans

5 at the Cats

4 at the Saints

23 at the Hawks

Club history is really important

Vince has to get 12.

Even if, for no other reason, it sends a message to Sylvia ' ... Thanks for the memories and the 10 years of investment. You have been replaced'.


Vince has to get 12.

Even if, for no other reason, it sends a message to Sylvia ' ... Thanks for the memories and the 10 years of investment. You have been replaced'.

We know you really miss him but you need to face the fact he has gone for ever!

I strongly disagree

If numbers meant nothing then why would Grimes wear 31 , Watts wear 4 , Trengove 9 and so on

You might not think so but the Club obviously does

17 at the Tigers

3 at the Dogs

14 at the Swans

5 at the Cats

4 at the Saints

23 at the Hawks

Club history is really important

Look I know that club history is important, but the numbers issue is a low level of magnitude on the scale of things.

And IF guys are to be given "marque" numbers they need to earn them first. Hell, didn't the Cockatoo-Galah twins get gifted 30 and 31 or something ridiculous like that (and ended up playing like 4 games between them)? Wheatley at 31 was a bloody hard worker but certainly not a "neo-Barassi", and nor is JG at least for now. JW ain't no TGNWS.

Tyson 3 if he wants it

 

Do the numbers really matter ? except for the legends of our club. I don't care if players wear #75 as long as they get the football and we win games.

Bernie Vince #12, Dom Tyson #3, Viv Michie #23, take #33 off Dom Barry and give him #36 (give it too the next big indigenous player), give #28 to Daniel Cross, Pick 9 (hopefully Nathan Freeman or Dom Sheed) #18.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 2 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 231 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies