Jump to content

Demons to Name Pick Number 1 early, good or bad?


Redleg

Recommended Posts

I don't want to sound like a know-it-all, but i was the one that started the thread on Demonology on Friday.

I am not sure how to post a link, but it is at http://demonology.midnight.net.au/ titled "MFC Draft Preview Night - Inside Word".

In it i stated:

The Mates of Melbourne group are having a National Draft Preview Night next Thursday night with Barry Prendergast speaking about what our club needs in the upcoming draft, which the invite promotes as the "Inside Word on the Draft".

All Foundation Hero members have been invited and they have been told they can bring guests.

Guess who got a guernsey?

BOOYAR!!!

The night is to be held at one of the Volvo dealerships to promote one of their new cars.

I have a feeling that the MFC might do a first and name the number 1 draft pick that night.

It would be a great promotion for one of our sponsors and it would certainly generate a lot of much needed positive press for the club.

I just pray it is Jack Watts they name, whether it is Thursday night or Saturday at 10.01am.

I now can't wait for Thursday night.

uhhh.. know-it-all ??

what exactly do you think you know other than the fact there will be a Draft Preview Night on thursday?

Not exactly exclusive info... & the idea of the number 1 draft pick being announced was in the paper..

Its just that you seem to be only repeating what everyone else already knows... do you have some other 'insider' info you've forgotten to mention?

Cos otherwise i'm confused

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

uhhh.. know-it-all ??

what exactly do you think you know other than the fact there will be a Draft Preview Night on thursday?

Not exactly exclusive info... & the idea of the number 1 draft pick being announced was in the paper..

Its just that you seem to be only repeating what everyone else already knows... do you have some other 'insider' info you've forgotten to mention?

Cos otherwise i'm confused

I believe a large part of proceedings will be devoted to trying to [censored] the latest model in the Volvo range. Prendergast is a bit of icing on the cake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carlton announced Bryce Gibbs before the season was even over... amazing they could be so sure that they would get the number one pick that year.

Kreuzer they started hyping as a certainty well before the event.

There's no harm in showing a card when everyone will get to see it first up anyway, and it's not like we're undermining the sancitity of the draft.

A nice idea, adding a bit of value to a sponsor event and also letting a few fans feel a bit more included. Another good little step.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing wrong with it!

Lol i remember in the NBA, in 2003, the NBA draft lottery was done, ( where ping pong balls are drawn to know the order of the draft). Cleveland won the lottery to choose 1st in the draft, and straight away the owner or GM whipped out a Lebron James Cleveland Cav jersey announcing that was their man hahahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing wrong with it!

Lol i remember in the NBA, in 2003, the NBA draft lottery was done, ( where ping pong balls are drawn to know the order of the draft). Cleveland won the lottery to choose 1st in the draft, and straight away the owner or GM whipped out a Lebron James Cleveland Cav jersey announcing that was their man hahahaha

Will be at the function with my iphone so, subject to there being an announcement and reception being ok, I'll post the news as it happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see how the AFL / NAB could take issue with it, I'm certain Carlton told the media they were picking Kruezer at least a day or two before last year's draft. I don't see how they could say you can release it to the media but it cannot be done at a sponsorship event. Sounds like a great idea to me, the kid needs to know, the pressue must be enormous. There is absolutely no competitive advantage to be gained from keeping it secret.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest melbman

Haydo has posted items on Demonology prior to the media releasing it. One being this Thursday night and his belief that the 1 choice would be named as well as CJ leaving the Dees way before the media got hold of it as well as the manner in which DB spoke to CJ regarding his decision to leave

I'm not the only one that looks forward to his posts over there

Link to comment
Share on other sites


There's no harm in showing a card when everyone will get to see it first up anyway, and it's not like we're undermining the sancitity of the draft.

A nice idea, adding a bit of value to a sponsor event and also letting a few fans feel a bit more included. Another good little step.

Beyond pandering to a few posters' anxiety complexes, I dont see any need to show your cards before the day you announce. Its got nothing to do making a few overly strung fans feeling included. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what the Mates of Melbourne invite says:

With the National Draft just days away, and the Club holding the No. 1 draft pick, get the inside word when you are treated to a National Draft preview from MELBOURNEfc's National Recruitment Manager, Barry Prendergast.

FWIW, the photograph that goes with it is a picture of Nick Nat handballing to Jack Watts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what the Mates of Melbourne invite says:

FWIW, the photograph that goes with it is a picture of Nick Nat handballing to Jack Watts.

Very cryptic. Can't remember a draft for the MFC filled with more suspense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How? Massive positive publicity and exposure for our Club before the draft wraps, when the public are inundated with draft news and views on each Club (with positive hype for all).

Other recruiters will have a ranking of all players in the draft and will choose their highest-ranking player that's still available so I don't see that it'd make much difference.

I certainly don't see that we'd lose much competitive advantage in naming the pick a little early.

Ok. So we get some exposure. Maybe Volvo gets mentioned a few times. The NAB draft as well as other sides will still be getting media attention as well.

Maybe I'm playing the devils advocate here, but if our No.1 pick is named on Thursday night. What is to say West Coast can't name there no.2 pick at a function on Friday, before Saturday's draft? Making a mockery of the draft.

Do we know the AFL's stance on this yet? Or have they given the club approval for this?

This'd be the tricky bit.

Pheonix raised a good point here. What if he did supposedly get hit by a tram/bus/car? Unlikely. But what if he did?

Better for us to keep it in wraps until Saturday IMO. :ph34r:

If they do, and the AFL have no problem, so be it. They would have set a precedent for future drafts. In a few years time. We'll all know the first 4 or 5 in order before the draft has started.

P.S. See all at the function. ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see how the AFL / NAB could take issue with it, I'm certain Carlton told the media they were picking Kruezer at least a day or two before last year's draft. I don't see how they could say you can release it to the media but it cannot be done at a sponsorship event. Sounds like a great idea to me, the kid needs to know, the pressue must be enormous. There is absolutely no competitive advantage to be gained from keeping it secret.

I don't have an issue with this..........

That is as long as the idea behind it is to generate some more much-needed publicity for the club, which in turn may help in our sponsor hunt.

But I have to ask, wouldn't the "chosen" kid already know? Or at least know before Saturday? Or is it totally up in the air for him too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the AFL will object. It will further increase the publicity and the anticipation for the event. Their only proviso should be that it is referred to as the NAB National Draft at all times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see how the AFL / NAB could take issue with it, I'm certain Carlton told the media they were picking Kruezer at least a day or two before last year's draft. I don't see how they could say you can release it to the media but it cannot be done at a sponsorship event. Sounds like a great idea to me, the kid needs to know, the pressue must be enormous. There is absolutely no competitive advantage to be gained from keeping it secret.

Carlton have never "officially" announced any of their No.1 draft picks like we have asked the AFL if we can do. All 3, Murphy, especially Gibbs & Kruezer were pretty much known as certainties and all but announced by Carlton, but not at a official function to announce it.

Separate from that, the situation is slightly different this year because of Naitanui. Watts is the stand out pick like Carlton's last 3, but Naitanui's unique athletic abilities & potential throw an extra spanner of unpredictability into the No.1 pick, not that this should effect the AFL decision, but it does add an extra level of excitement when there's no genuine certainty for the No.1 spot, which hasn't really happened since 2001

Greg Miller used to give a draft preview to premium Richmond members and name picks - Jack Riewoldt for one ...

They still do, it's on tonight. They outline who they expect the club to draft with saying exactly who it'll be. They also have a function the week following the draft where they introduce the draftees to the members, they were a bit sneaky last year also introducing the rookies before the rookies draft had even taken place.

Ok. So we get some exposure. Maybe Volvo gets mentioned a few times. The NAB draft as well as other sides will still be getting media attention as well.

Maybe I'm playing the devils advocate here, but if our No.1 pick is named on Thursday night. What is to say West Coast can't name there no.2 pick at a function on Friday, before Saturday's draft? Making a mockery of the draft.

Do we know the AFL's stance on this yet? Or have they given the club approval for this?

The AFL is to stop them. We're are asking for AFL approval to announce the No. 1 pick early & make a spectacle of it, if WC asked the AFL could just say no because there is significantly less interest outside of WC who goes at the No. 2 pick, but everyone wants to know who'll go at pick 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haydo has posted items on Demonology prior to the media releasing it. One being this Thursday night and his belief that the 1 choice would be named as well as CJ leaving the Dees way before the media got hold of it as well as the manner in which DB spoke to CJ regarding his decision to leave

I'm not the only one that looks forward to his posts over there

I was talking about the thursday thing... but anyway, seems i was missing something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carlton have never "officially" announced any of their No.1 draft picks like we have asked the AFL if we can do. All 3, Murphy, especially Gibbs & Kruezer were pretty much known as certainties and all but announced by Carlton, but not at a official function to announce it.

Kruezer was contacted by the CFC prior to the draft & told he would be taken at No 1 by them & that was confirmed by CFC in the media. Whether or not its at a function 36 hours before the event or in media interviews 24 hours before the event should not be relevant, its either OK or it isnt & last year when CFC did it nobody made a fuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


At the end of the day, pick 1 is going to get the same level of publicity anyway. By announcing it on the Friday we'll get no more - and no less. We'll see the chosen one on the front of Saturdays sport section in a Demons polo, instead of seeing it in Sundays sport section. We'll hear him interviewed on the TV or radio on Friday, instead of Saturday.

With picks 2, 3 and 4 belonging to interstate sides this year it doesnt concern me as much, but had say Collingwood or Essendon held pick 2 I wouldn't be making an annoucement on the Friday - all you do then is allow the load to get shared with them on draft day. The media would say "we've already spoken to him, lets interview picks 2 and 3 etc"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day, pick 1 is going to get the same level of publicity anyway. By announcing it on the Friday we'll get no more - and no less. We'll see the chosen one on the front of Saturdays sport section in a Demons polo, instead of seeing it in Sundays sport section. We'll hear him interviewed on the TV or radio on Friday, instead of Saturday.

With picks 2, 3 and 4 belonging to interstate sides this year it doesnt concern me as much, but had say Collingwood or Essendon held pick 2 I wouldn't be making an annoucement on the Friday - all you do then is allow the load to get shared with them on draft day. The media would say "we've already spoken to him, lets interview picks 2 and 3 etc"

I'm afraid i disagree. If we announce it early we get a big stand alone article in every newspaper. And if we announce a major sponsor at the same time this gives them maximum exposure.

This is as opposed to waiting until draft day, with us picking Watts just another article amongst all the other positive articles about which players were taken by which club and all the draft analysis.

It would be the main article, but if anything it is 'old news' as we were expected to take him anyway. The real point of interest is how the rest of the draft panned out.

Our pick would be swamped with other AFL news it has to share the spotlight with.

Now, if we take Naitanui that is different. But we would benefit from 2 days of people talking about the MFC & little else football related in the lead up to the draft.

In each of these cases it can only be a good thing announcing early.

We need to promote this club.

I agree that on the saturday we wouldn't be spoken to much, but as it is the National Draft & he IS the number 1 pick, the media will rehash everything from the previous days along with new little anecdotes about Watts joining MFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kruezer was contacted by the CFC prior to the draft & told he would be taken at No 1 by them & that was confirmed by CFC in the media. Whether or not its at a function 36 hours before the event or in media interviews 24 hours before the event should not be relevant, its either OK or it isnt & last year when CFC did it nobody made a fuss.

They confirmed that AFTER the draft, that they had contact Kruezer on Wednesday night and told him he'd be No.1 and this is pretty standard practice that the club with pick 1 tells whoever they're going to take before the actual day of the draft. We want to announce it at an event in front of the media, not just Barry knocking on Mr & Mrs. Watts door and sitting down with them & young Jack to confirm he'll go No.1

2 very different situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I'm playing the devils advocate here, but if our No.1 pick is named on Thursday night. What is to say West Coast can't name there no.2 pick at a function on Friday, before Saturday's draft? Making a mockery of the draft.

Do we know the AFL's stance on this yet? Or have they given the club approval for this?

If they do, and the AFL have no problem, so be it. They would have set a precedent for future drafts. In a few years time. We'll all know the first 4 or 5 in order before the draft has started.

Who cares whether WCE name their second pick at a function?

It makes no difference to the MFC.

I'm afraid i disagree. If we announce it early we get a big stand alone article in every newspaper. And if we announce a major sponsor at the same time this gives them maximum exposure.

Exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we announce a major sponsor as well then its a whole different story.

However, I suspect the AFL will veto any request to announce it on Friday. Why? Well because the AFL are paid a considerable sum by the National Australia Bank for sponsorship of the U18 program and the National Draft and they'll want Pick 1 and all publicity that comes with it to be promoting the NAB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the AFL will object. It will further increase the publicity and the anticipation for the event. Their only proviso should be that it is referred to as the NAB National Draft at all times.

The MFC has done a deal with Volvo with this function to promote the new Volvo XC60.

The more column centimetres of PR Volvo get in the newspapers and airtime on TV and Radio, the more dollars we will get paid by Volvo.

That's how PR works.

There are formulas of how it is calculated. Simple as that.

It equates to $$$$ in our coffers and it also provides much needed positive media focused on our club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know for a fact last year one of the picks in the second half of the top 10 was contacted by the club that picked him up on the wed or thurs saying they would be picking him up. I think it is very common in the top 10 for the clubs to notify them before the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    FROZEN by Whispering Jack

    Who would have thought?    Collingwood had a depleted side with several star players out injured, Max Gawn was in stellar form, Christian Petracca at the top of his game and Simon Goodwin was about to pull off a masterstroke in setting Alex Neal-Bullen onto him to do a fantastic job in subduing the Magpies' best player. Goody had his charges primed to respond robustly to the challenge of turning around their disappointing performance against Fremantle in Alice Springs. And if not that, t

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 7

    TURNAROUND by KC from Casey

    The Casey Demons won their first game at home this year in the traditional King’s Birthday Weekend clash with Collingwood VFL on Sunday in a dramatic turnaround on recent form that breathed new life into the beleaguered club’s season. The Demons led from the start to record a 52-point victory. It was their highest score and biggest winning margin by far for the 2024 season. Under cloudy but calm conditions for Casey Fields, the home side, wearing the old Springvale guernsey as a mark of res

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    PREGAME: Rd 15 vs North Melbourne

    After two disappointing back to back losses the Demons have the bye in Round 14 and then face perennial cellar dweller North Melbourne at the MCG on Saturday night in Round 15. Who comes in and who goes out?

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 167

    PODCAST: Rd 13 vs Collingwood

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 11th June @ 8:30pm. Join George, Binman & I as we analyse the Demons loss at the MCG against the Magpies in the Round 13 on Kings Birthday. You questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human. L

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 36

    VOTES: Rd 13 vs Collingwood

    Captain Max Gawn has a considerable lead over reigning champion Christian Petracca in the Demonland Player of the Year Award. Steven May, Alex Neal-Bullen & Jack Viney make up the Top 5. Your votes for the loss against the Magpies. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 41

    POSTGAME: Rd 13 vs Collingwood

    Once again inaccuracy and inefficiency going inside 50 rears it's ugly head as the Demons suffered their second loss on the trot and their fourth loss in five games as they go down to the Pies by 38 points on Kings Birthday at the MCG.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 415

    GAMEDAY: Rd 13 vs Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons are once again faced with a classic 8 point game against a traditional rival on King's Birthday at the MCG. A famous victory will see them reclaim a place in the Top 8 whereas a loss will be another blow for their finals credentials.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 941

    BOILED LOLLIES by The Oracle

    In the space of a month Melbourne has gone from chocolates to boiled lollies in terms of its standing as a candidate for the AFL premiership.  The club faces its moment of truth against a badly bruised up Collingwood at the MCG. A win will give it some respite but even then, it won’t be regarded particularly well being against an opponent carrying the burden of an injured playing list. A loss would be a disaster. The Demons have gone from a six/two win/loss ratio and a strong percentag

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews 3

    CLEAN HANDS by KC from Casey

    The Casey Demons headed into town and up Sydney Road to take on the lowly Coburg Lions who have been perennial VFL easy beats and sitting on one win for the season. Last year, Casey beat them in a practice match when resting their AFL listed players. That’s how bad they were. Nobody respected them on Saturday and clearly not the Demons who came to the game with 22 players (ten MFC), but whether they came out to play is another matter because for the most part, their intensity was lacking an

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...