Jump to content

Featured Replies

I'm really curious about what happened to Gawn in the final quarter? There was a 15 minute spell where AJ was taking all the ruck contests and Gawn simply wasn't on the ground. There was some early talk by the commentators about getting a bang on the nose but not a peep about Gawn's extended absence while they were going on and on about Callghan having an obviously scheduled rest.

Can anyone enlighten me? Had his nose opened up and they could get him on because of the blood rule, maybe?

Solid chance it tipped the game - he was the best on ground even though he missed that chunk of time and could surely have influenced some of the crucial ruck contests where we had only AJ available.

 
2 hours ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

To everyone having a crack at JVR, he was on Taylor who had almost no impact on the game. Time to learn modern footy

U are kidding are u saying our major forward was playing a defensive role against a defender,??? PAAARK ME IF THAT IS MODERN FOOTY ITS PAAARKED Hudson, Mc Kenna, et all would beg to disagree. FORWARDS ARE THERE TO KICK GOALS!  

1 minute ago, At Least I Saw a Flag said:

My only reservation is the level of foot skills among the team.

A few times we were 'on', but a miskick (usually overkicking) across the ground led to costly turnovers.

Yep, GWS outskilled us 

But we probably all knew that going into the game

But the script wasn't much different ... we kick into a crowded forward line and the opposition move the ball rapidly into an open forward line

It's why teams like the Pies have our measure

 
17 minutes ago, Macca said:

We were too top heavy up forward especially on a day not suited for high marking.  We should have had another late withdrawal and given Langford a full game (take your pick on a sub) 

I don’t agree, I thought there was very little about Langford’s game that indicated we would’ve been better off with him playing from the start.

The game got wetter than expected in the 3rd but otherwise wasn’t all that wet for large stints.

We needed someone with speed, forward craft and pressure, ideally not a tall but I thought Jeffo did better than a shorter player for the sake of it.

They were right not to rush Spargo again but hopefully he’s available soon. All the rest of the one paced options -  Langford, Laurie, Billings wouldn’t have helped us. If there was anyone to pick it was probably Kynan Brown, at least as sub. 

1 hour ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

We did not loose the game because of fitness, one less game that GW$, the kids, the umpires, yadda, yadda, yadda . . .

We lost because:

  • there was ZERO on-field leadership during the last 100 seconds of the game, and
  • the off-field catastrophy of 2024 most definitely, probably, cost us Houston.

So utterly *&%#ing Melbourne.

Why worry about missing out on Houston. If we had got him we wouldn’t have drafted XL. 


Just now, picket fence said:

FORWARDS ARE THERE TO KICK GOALS!  

Or bring the ball to the ground for our small brigade,  but it did not come in to him properly at all, 

52 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

My Fifteen year old daughter who's a Demon but never been a massive fan said, and I quote "I get it now, let's go every week" .

This makes me smile. 

I think second guessing about selection today is a bad idea. 

The guys we had out there had a crack and more of them did well than not. It sucks to lose a game of football this way but what can you do? Build on from this performance.

 
29 minutes ago, Macca said:

We were too top heavy up forward especially on a day not suited for high marking.  We should have had another late withdrawal and given Langford a full game (take your pick on a sub) 

If AJ stays in as the 2nd ruck I can't see a spot for Jefferson.  Nor did I think that Jefferson was particularly hard at the contest or chased with intent

Kicked a couple of handy goals but apart from that, he did very little

And JVR is not a proven KPF (yet) so to be effectively playing 3 rookie talls up forward is at least 1 too many.  Poor selections

We probably need to recruit in a KPF from elsewhere if we are looking for B+ or A grade

In the meantime, one of AJ or Jeffo plays but not both.  We could get away with it against teams like North but against the Pies, Lions, Sydney or GWS and the like? 

I don't think so

It's JVR & AJ for mine with Fritsch as the 3rd tall ... Turner or Jeffo as replacements if AJ doesn't fire (JVR can ruck for 5 minutes per quarter)

Petracca & Kozzy up forward so we end up medium/tall.  Melksham? 

A. J Handy and busted his guts, Jeffo is class and a natural forward with smarts, moving forward Jeffo is the one who needs games!!! Should play all games this season


1 minute ago, DeeSpencer said:

I don’t agree, I thought there was very little about Langford’s game that indicated we would’ve been better off with him playing from the start.

 

We were at least one runner short and the match was lost at the selection table.  

JVR, AJ, Jeffo & Fritsch in the one forward line on a day where rain was forecast?  

Being top heavy allowed the opposition to run the ball out of our forward line far too easily.  Our defensive forward line pressure just wasn't up to it

If you are going to go that tall in the forward line then fast corridor entries are needed so as to catch the opposition out.  But instead of kicking to 1 on 1's in the hot spot, the ball (once again) ends up being kicked to packs near the boundary line

 

Watching the replay 11:37 left in the first quarter. Dwayne Russell “It’s their home, but it’s not really their home. They live in a shed really. In fact they don’t get to be on this lounge room floor all that often”

Pretty sure he is just making things up as he goes and saying whatever weird stuff comes into his head. 

Edited by Bonkers

19 minutes ago, Demondan75 said:

Will AJ get looked at for the tackle on Brown?

I wouldn't be surprised if he gets a week. Brown got up and was fine by the looks of it. But being first game they might set the precedence unfortunately. Shouldn't be more then a free kick but they really come down hard on these careless tackles especially early in season to try to deter players (never seems to work much anyway).

1 minute ago, picket fence said:

A. J Handy and busted his guts, Jeffo is class and a natural forward with smarts, moving forward Jeffo is the one who needs games!!! Should play all games this season

The issue surrounding Jeffo's selection is the 2nd ruck duties

If AJ is needed in the ruck (if we don't want to use JVR) then can we play JVR, AJ & Jeffo every week?  

None of the 3 are proven forwards (although, JVR can make it to that level)

Just now, Roost it far said:

It made me happy. She’s excellent at reports as well. 

She’s only just today decided she likes footy, and you’re pencilling her in for reports??!

#CuttingSomeone’sGrassMuch?


7 minutes ago, picket fence said:

U are kidding are u saying our major forward was playing a defensive role against a defender,??? PAAARK ME IF THAT IS MODERN FOOTY ITS PAAARKED Hudson, Mc Kenna, et all would beg to disagree. FORWARDS ARE THERE TO KICK GOALS!  

Yes and no. A recent AFL term is "defensive forward". Honestly if you're helping your team kick goals or you're stopping the opposition doing that you've had a good day. And if a forward's efforts mean a top defender or defence bring about way less opposition scoring chains or inside 50s as well as being excused for not scoring his day could be lauded.

I think Adam Kingsleys post match interview should get a watch from a few of our “supporters” 

I haven’t watched the game yet but he thinks we are going to be a very good team - I think his assessment is probably more accurate than some of those who seem very glass half empty atm 

Yep really disappointed in a loss but seriously didn’t think we’d get that close having watched GWS live the week before 

Truth is we could put in a few stinkers and then you’d be entitled to be negative but not after today as this game was ours until the last minute 

Work to be done but a really decent effort from a team with more new blood than we’ve seen for a very long time 

 

4 minutes ago, Macca said:

  Our defensive forward line pressure just wasn't up to it

Agree with that, don’t agree swapping Jeffo for a slow player just because they’re shorter would’ve made a big impact.

Need Pickett, Spargo and Kolt back, just hard to fill gaps down 3 guys in one role 

54 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Something that cost us was not having someone on the goal line.  They got 3-4 scappy goal as a result - at least 2 from Cogniglio could have been stopped had we had someone behind the pack.

I was ropeable with those two goals. Both times he was unmarked. Three goals to cognilio. That's the game right there.

3 minutes ago, binman said:

I was ropeable with those two goals. Both times he was unmarked. Three goals to cognilio. That's the game right there.

They hurt, we were aghast that no one was on the goal line with the ball pinging around like it was. 


goodwin has just done a quick post-game ahead of 4.5 hours of coding

https://www.melbournefc.com.au/video/1733798/simons-sign-off-round-1?videoId=1733798&modal=true&type=video&publishFrom=1742120670001

the change to his media persona is striking

definitely going down the reverend style of opening up in his coaching journey

 

Edited by whatwhat say what

Just now, DeeSpencer said:

Agree with that, don’t agree swapping Jeffo for a slow player

Swapping Jeffo for a slow player?  I didn't say that and besides which, who is slower than Jeffo anyway?  Jeffo is not exactly Gout Gout

We could have played Langford or Billings as another runner (or both if we wanted to match GWS' running ability)

Prior to the season there was hardly anyone here advocating playing Jeffo, JVR & AJ in the one team so I'm not sure why suddenly that can be a workable plan

Maybe down the track where the actual output from all 3 is more than adequate but right now?  It's like we're playing 1 or 2 short

 
3 hours ago, bobby1554 said:

Agree. The fluffed kicks, taking the wrong option, Johnson sprays his kick, GWS clean, untouched to Keeffe who hammers it over the goal umpires head. So typically Melbourne. Our skills are sub standard, we are a mile off it.

And this week's hyperbole award goes to...


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 385 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies