10 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

$46 a month is a massive 50% price rise.

For a sports service that only has four "big" sports three of which are non exclusive (AFL, NRL and cricket) that's a big ask. F1 is exclusive but given its time zones is it really that big.

I always knew Foxtel/Kayo was a loss leader for Rupert but what worries me is that a back of the envelope calculation shows that even at $46 per month with everyone staying for 12 months it's still a loss operation.

Next stop... ban password sharing and bring on more ads.

DAZN are cashing in

It does my head in because the only sport I watch on Kayo is AFL, yet it is by far my most expensive streaming service.

58 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

DAZN are cashing in

They are certainly reducing the operating loss but it will be a painful road to profitability.

We're simply too small a market for ever increasing sports rights fees

I’m probably not quite as anti Kayo as some on here. For $450 I got MFC membership, MFCW membership and Kayo for a year. Reckon that probably works out for Kayo at $25p/mth. That is expensive compared to other steaming services but still just doable particularly considering I’d get it no matter what (I live interstate)

7 hours ago, FarNorthernD said:

I’m probably not quite as anti Kayo as some on here. For $450 I got MFC membership, MFCW membership and Kayo for a year. Reckon that probably works out for Kayo at $25p/mth. That is expensive compared to other steaming services but still just doable particularly considering I’d get it no matter what (I live interstate)

Is that the 4k service FND?

I wonder what the story is with these club deals. I assume Kayo think these people would have gone after 6 months and therefore they are giving 12 months for the price of 8. If you assume the club gets say $25 for the referral it's a bigger subsidy.

IMO Kayo need another killer sport such as EPL