Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
5 hours ago, M_9 said:

I can't believe the DL'ers leaving out TMac. I'm really  hoping Howes can take his place, sooner rather than later, but the reality is that TMac was our 10th best  player last year. I'll bet he's just as fit as he was in Feb 2024, and given we're unlikely to select Campbell or AJ v GWS, TMac is a second ruck option. Howes isn't, and I'd prefer JvR wasn't (used in the ruck).

It's really difficult to imagine a fit TMac being left out of this game. 

 

Is there training tomorrow?

Freo are my dark horse tip for the flag. Good test for our midfield in particular. 


8 hours ago, Demonland said:

He needs some form of match fitness before round 1. Even if they play him for a half v Freo 

Curious with what we do with Pickett.  If this a full dress rehersal for Rd 1, do we leave him out?

For me, it really depends on how big the benches are (ie how many players the coaches can give a run to see how they fit), but given Pickett has already played 2 preseason games, I actually think he will be left out (which will surprise some).

12 minutes ago, Vipercrunch said:

Curious with what we do with Pickett.  If this a full dress rehersal for Rd 1, do we leave him out?

For me, it really depends on how big the benches are (ie how many players the coaches can give a run to see how they fit), but given Pickett has already played 2 preseason games, I actually think he will be left out (which will surprise some).

Interesting point.

As you say koz had had two sold hit outs already. And obviously he's not playing in the first 3 rounds.

That could mean them running with the team they might go with round one.

That said missing the first three rounds might mean they want to take the opportunity to get one more match load and fitness into koz.

 

If you’ve got a big interchange bench which I imagine they do then play him for a quarter. It’s a golden opportunity for him to meet his new teammates. 🤦‍♂️

32 minutes ago, Vipercrunch said:

Curious with what we do with Pickett.  If this a full dress rehersal for Rd 1, do we leave him out?

For me, it really depends on how big the benches are (ie how many players the coaches can give a run to see how they fit), but given Pickett has already played 2 preseason games, I actually think he will be left out (which will surprise some).

Yeah that question has crossed my mind too.

He's not playing until 4 April so they may think it's necessary for him to get some minutes this weekend.

On the other hand, the team needs to get used to not having him there. We won't have the luxury of Kozzie kicking or setting up a goal when we badly need one, in the first three games.


15 minutes ago, binman said:

Interesting point.

As you say koz had had two sold hit outs already. And obviously he's not playing in the first 3 rounds.

That could mean them running with the team they might go with round one.

That said missing the first three rounds might mean they want to take the opportunity to get one more match load and fitness into koz.

The round 4 game is on April 4th, which is almost 5 weeks after this Sunday's game.  There will be virtually zero residual fitness benefit for playing Pickett on Sunday.  All his match fitness and loads will have to be managed in training sessions in the couple of weeks prior to that game. 

Still very hard to stomach that he got suspended for that incident.... stupid AFL 🤬🤬🤬 

I hope we play our best available team and see if we have learned any lessons about how to handle Freo’s midfield and transition. Maybe Freo won’t show their hand but they destroyed us twice last year in a way that showed they had an advantage not only in form but some deep tactic we couldn’t handle. 
Our aims should be no injuries, have a good warm up and see what we can do about their midfield to start the season positively. Go Dees.

21 hours ago, Supreme_Demon said:

Hoping both Jack Henderson and Jai Culley get a chance to play against Fremantle in this practice match.

They won't.

This will be our full dress rehearsal and I presume we will ve playing our best available team.


1 hour ago, Vipercrunch said:

The round 4 game is on April 4th, which is almost 5 weeks after this Sunday's game.  There will be virtually zero residual fitness benefit for playing Pickett on Sunday.  All his match fitness and loads will have to be managed in training sessions in the couple of weeks prior to that game. 

Still very hard to stomach that he got suspended for that incident.... stupid AFL 🤬🤬🤬 

Yeah, you're prob right about the benefit of Koz playing from a fitness perspective.

But if Koz doesn't play, come round four it will be seven weeks since he has played in a competitive inter team match. If he plays, its six weeks between proper hit outs.

One less week doesn't sound much, but in terms of match 'touch' it might be a factor in their thinking about selecting him this week.    

6 minutes ago, binman said:

Yeah, you're prob right about the benefit of Koz playing from a fitness perspective.

But if Koz doesn't play, come round four it will be seven weeks since he has played in a competitive inter team match. If he plays, its six weeks between proper hit outs.

One less week doesn't sound much, but in terms of match 'touch' it might be a factor in their thinking about selecting him this week.    

When we wallop Freo it may cause him to rethink any ideas about going there.....

Hypothetically, If he plays this weekend and commits another reportable offence, can he be suspended again, on top of his existing suspension?

Or does what happens in Community Series stay in Community Series?

How many players can we take into this week's game? 

Normal season rules 23 players or same as last weekend 30? 

Its a real tough one this week with Kozzie but unfortunately I think he will be on limited minutes.

Can't take away to much game time away from someone lining up to play R1, R2 and R3.

I have a feeling he will be going into a fitness block now to preparing for no footy for the next month.

 

Edited by YesitwasaWin4theAges

8 minutes ago, JTR said:

Hypothetically, If he plays this weekend and commits another reportable offence, can he be suspended again, on top of his existing suspension?

Or does what happens in Community Series stay in Community Series?

Yes


6 minutes ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

How many players can we take into this week's game? 

Normal season rules 23 players or same as last weekend 30? 

Its a real tough one this week with Kozzie but unfortunately I think he will be on limited minutes.

Can't take away to much game time away from someone lining up to play R1, R2 and R3.

I have a feeling he will be going into a fitness block now to preparing for no footy for the next month.

 

Last night was 30 and unlimited bench changes, so guessing the same.

15 minutes ago, JTR said:

Hypothetically, If he plays this weekend and commits another reportable offence, can he be suspended again, on top of his existing suspension?

Or does what happens in Community Series stay in Community Series?

99.9% certain if he gets reported and suspended on Sunday, the suspension will take place from round 4 onwards.

In fact I'm 100% sure.

1 hour ago, deejammin' said:

I hope we play our best available team and see if we have learned any lessons about how to handle Freo’s midfield and transition. Maybe Freo won’t show their hand but they destroyed us twice last year in a way that showed they had an advantage not only in form but some deep tactic we couldn’t handle. 
Our aims should be no injuries, have a good warm up and see what we can do about their midfield to start the season positively. Go Dees.

Agree with all this.

Feels as though Longmuir and McRae have Goodwin's measure in the coaches box.

Even in 2022 (10-0) and 2023 (7-3) when we went in as outrageous favourites against Freo at the G, they took us apart in both games, particularly the 2022 game. We seem to structure up terribly against them and I'm not sure why.

However, the most important objective is no injuries on Sunday. The club needs a break from people continually going down with medium or long term injuries.

 
27 minutes ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

Last night was 30 and unlimited bench changes, so guessing the same.

But only 4 players could be interchanged at any one time.  So players in the 30 had to be subbed on or out of the game.

It’s the perfect opponent for us to face prior to the season. They flogged us last year and we’ve made some adjustments and added quality to our list. We don’t have to win but we don’t want to get blown away a week out from the season. I want us to beat them in the middle and give our forwards half a chance. 


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • WHAT’S NEXT? by The Oracle

    What’s next for a beleagured Melbourne Football Club down in form and confidence, facing  intense criticism and disapproval over some underwhelming recent performances and in the midst of a four game losing streak? Why, it’s Adelaide which boasts the best percentage in the AFL and has won six of its last seven games. The Crows are hot and not only that, the game is at the Adelaide Oval; yet another away fixture and the third in a row at a venue outside of Victoria. One of the problems the Demons have these days is that they rarely have the luxury of true home ground advantage, something they have enjoyed just once since mid April. 

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 132 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 231 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 41 replies