Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author

Now that Henderson is on our list it's time to do another 46. Chandler played in the sim he's fine Windsor on the other hand could be in trouble.

Melbourne 

B: Lever, May, Bowey

HB: Salem, Petty, C.Windsor

C: Sharp, Rivers, Langdon

HF: Petracca, Turner, Langford

F: Fritsch, van Rooyen, Chandler

FOLL: Gawn, Oliver, Viney

IC: Howes, Sparrow, Lindsay, Billings

SUB: Laurie

 

Casey

B: Hore, Adams, Bonner

HB: Sestan, McDonald, Moniz-Wakefield

C; Woewodin, Henderson, K.Windsor

HF: Spargo, Johnson, Brown

F: Melksham, Jefferson, Fullerton

FOLL: Campbell, Culley, Hardie

IC: Verrall, Mentha, George, Baldi, Yze

2 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

 

 

 
4 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Tom Green’s a chance to miss round 1 with a calf injury.

Epic out if that comes to fruition.

4-6 weeks from now takes him being unavailable til about rd 3-4

 
3 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

You’re short a 7th defender there, unless Riv is really only doing cameos on ball or Bowey is playing back from the forward flank.

I don’t think Spargo will be rushed this year, they painfully learned that lesson last year.

There’s a bunch of players who are playing to win their spot in the preseason games - AJ, Jeffo, the new kids, the new men (Sharp and Henderson).

Not having a go at you in particular but I think fans have to come to grips with the idea that Billings is playing to not lose his spot on the wing. If he’s adequate he’ll get the job in round 1.

Yep, I missed the 7th defender so I guess Bowey goes to the bench to take that spot, Billing’s plays on the wing which worries me. Henderson becomes sub (that’s a total guess as I’ve no idea other than a hunch as that’s why he was put on the list and Laurie gets a guernsey if Spargo doesn’t play 

  • Author
4 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

Now that Henderson is on our list it's time to do another 46. Chandler played in the sim he's fine Windsor on the other hand could be in trouble.

Melbourne 

B: Lever, May, Bowey

HB: Salem, Petty, C.Windsor

C: Sharp, Rivers, Langdon

HF: Petracca, Turner, Langford

F: Fritsch, van Rooyen, Chandler

FOLL: Gawn, Oliver, Viney

IC: Howes, Sparrow, Lindsay, Billings

SUB: Laurie

 

Casey

B: Hore, Adams, Bonner

HB: Sestan, McDonald, Moniz-Wakefield

C; Woewodin, Henderson, K.Windsor

HF: Spargo, Johnson, Brown

F: Melksham, Jefferson, Fullerton

FOLL: Campbell, Culley, Hardie

IC: Verrall, Mentha, George, Baldi, Yze

 

I'll do my VFL side again because I forgot a very important member of the team the 3rd best Casey listed player in Smith so I dropped K.Windsor put Henderson on the wing and Baldi in the middle.

Casey

B: Hore, Adams, Bonner

HB: Sestan, McDonald, Moniz-Wakefield

C: Woewodin, Baldi, Henderson

HF: Spargo, Johnson, Brown

F: Melksham, Jefferson, Fullerton

FOLL: Campbell, Culley, Hardie

IC: Verrall, Mentha, Smith, George, Yze


5 hours ago, adonski said:

Some luck turning our way, Tom Green out for 4 - 6 weeks

image.png.4c28fccdc2c1493eaa542da23886bc16.png

Absolutely towelled us up last time he played us. Big out.

27 minutes ago, Lexinator said:

Absolutely towelled us up last time he played us. Big out.

We lost be a point? After storming home in the last?

Possibly the coldest I have ever been at the footy

45 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

I'll do my VFL side again because I forgot a very important member of the team the 3rd best Casey listed player in Smith so I dropped K.Windsor put Henderson on the wing and Baldi in the middle.

Casey

B: Hore, Adams, Bonner

HB: Sestan, McDonald, Moniz-Wakefield

C: Woewodin, Baldi, Henderson

HF: Spargo, Johnson, Brown

F: Melksham, Jefferson, Fullerton

FOLL: Campbell, Culley, Hardie

IC: Verrall, Mentha, Smith, George, Yze

That team won’t lose a game…

 
8 hours ago, whatwhat say what said:

We lost be a point? After storming home in the last?

Possibly the coldest I have ever been at the footy

Yeah, lost by 2 points. From memory, think we were up a few goals at start of game and GWS slowly clawed back and got the lead only for us to charge back but ran out of time. Yes, from memory it was wet and cold night and attendance was subsequently quite low.

22 hours ago, Little Goffy said:

Am I the only one amused seeing      'C: Sharp'?  ...that must offer a nickname. Piano?

22 hours ago, bush demon said:

"C sharp" is a bugger of a key to play in.  I hope the match committee know what they are doing.

16 hours ago, GS_1905 said:

C sharp in a Dee Minor premiership?

Had to be done. 

If he has a bad day he might B flat  ( Bb )


11 hours ago, Roost it far said:

Yep, I missed the 7th defender so I guess Bowey goes to the bench to take that spot, Billing’s plays on the wing which worries me. Henderson becomes sub (that’s a total guess as I’ve no idea other than a hunch as that’s why he was put on the list and Laurie gets a guernsey if Spargo doesn’t play 

...who'd be the D-7th?

2 minutes ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

...who'd be the D-7th?

May, Lever, Petty, Howes, Salem and Windsor with Bowey on the bench.

For mine the fitness of Spargo, who I rate, will be something to watch. I’m pretty sure the FD want him in the side as soon as he’s ready. That is probably after 2-3 games at Casey to get his touch but if we can’t play Windsor in the opening rounds, if Henderson isn’t ready and the form of Billing’s and Laurie is less than positive I suspect he’ll play earlier, perhaps even week 1. 

We’ve got potential small forwards in Pickett, Chandler, Spargo, Sharp, AMW, Henderson and perhaps even Brown, Billing’s and Laurie. The inclusion of Langford means we’ve now got an obvious Tracc rotation so taking it we’ll play 3 talls and Pickett will return in round 4 it’s highly likely Chandler will get the nod. Then there’s Langdon who could be earmarked for ANB’s role. That leaves Sharp and Billibgs on a wing, Spargo on the bench, AMW, Henderson, Laurie and Brown at Casey. Of those I think Laurie, AMW and Henderson appear closest to seniors with Brown further back. The question is who’s taking Pickett’s spot in the first 3 weeks? 

55 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

May, Lever, Petty, Howes, Salem and Windsor with Bowey on the bench.

Actually, Roost, I'd wondered if we'd SSP'd one of Neil Chordy's offspring...


My bet is that TMac plays well in the preseason games and that Petty plays ok but gets played as a forward in Round 1.

TMac was the 14th highest rated key defender in the AFL last season based on Wheelo ratings and our best. While this may not be the best way to measure key defenders, he was very good last year and he has reportedly had another good preseason.

I also think Petty could be much better as a forward this season than last. His lack of preseason last year meant he lacked power and acceleration. Moreover, our midfield supply was reduced last year due to Oliver being so down and Petracca getting injured.

The forward line showed against the Suns that it could work with Petty, Turner and Van Rooyen playing forward.

B: Lever, May, Bowey
HB: Salem, Petty, C.Windsor
C: Sharp, Clarry, Billings
HF: Petracca, Turner, Sparrow
F: Fritsch, van Rooyen, Chandler
FOLL: Gawn, , Rivers, Langdon
IC: Howes, , Viney, Langford, Laurie, Woey

Edited by BangBnagBang

3 hours ago, BangBnagBang said:

B: Lever, May, Bowey
HB: Salem, Petty, C.Windsor
C: Sharp, Clarry, Billings
HF: Petracca, Turner, Sparrow
F: Fritsch, van Rooyen, Chandler
FOLL: Gawn, , Rivers, Langdon
IC: Howes, , Viney, Langford, Laurie, Woey

Decent team but lacks forward pressure, 

Teams will waltz the ball out of their backline


1 hour ago, DubDee said:

Decent team but lacks forward pressure, 

Teams will waltz the ball out of their backline

Henderson-as-ANB?

His GF tackling contributed to his Goss medal.

On 18/02/2025 at 03:51, WERRIDEE said:

We are only a month away from play GWS in the first game for the season.

This is my senior team and Casey team. 

MELBOURNE 

B: Lever, May, Bowey
HB: Salem, Petty, C.Windsor
C: Sharp, Rivers, Langdon
HF: Petracca, Turner, Langford
F: Fritsch, van Rooyen, Chandler
FOLL: Gawn, Oliver, Viney
IC: Howes, Sparrow, Lindsay, Billings
SUB: Laurie

CASEY DEMONS

B: Hore, Adams, Bonner
HB: Sestan, McDonald, Moniz-Wakefield
C: Woewodin, Baldi, K.Windsor
HF: Spargo, Johnson, Brown
F: Fullerton, Jefferson, Melksham
FOLL: Campbell, Culley, Hardie
IC: Verrall, Mentha, Smith, Sruk, Yze 
 
SUSPENDED: Pickett
INJURED: McVee Tholstrup
ILL: Kentfield
INACTIVE: McAdam

Tough to do but I reckon 1 of Jeffo or Johnson will play, Howes, Billings or Lindsay out 

B: Howes, May, Petty

HB: Salem, Lever, Windsor

C: Billings, Oliver, Sharp

HF: Fritsch, Turner, Petracca

F: Chandler, JVR, Henderson

R: Gawn, Viney, Rivers

I: Langdon, Bowey, Sparrow, Langford

Sub: Lindsay/Woey

 
  • Author
1 hour ago, Demons11 said:

Tough to do but I reckon 1 of Jeffo or Johnson will play, Howes, Billings or Lindsay out 

Howes, Billings and Lindsay played in the red and blue strip last week while Jefferson and Johnson played in the white strip. The only player I see possibly coming in is Henderson I don't know where he's at we'll wait and see at the Norf game. Laurie, Jefferson and Johnson as a possibility to be sub.

 

Melbourne

B: Lever, May, Bowey

HB: Salem, Petty, C.Windsor

C: Sharp, Rivers, Langdon

HF: Petracca, van Rooyen, Henderson

F: Fritsch, Turner, Chandler

IC: Howes, Langford, Lindsay, Sparrow

SUB: Billings

EMERG: Moniz-Wakefield, Laurie, Jefferson

If Windsor doesn't play I'm replacing him with Moniz-Wakefield.

 

Casey

B: Hore, Adams, Bonner

HB: Sestan, McDonald, Moniz-Wakefield

C: Woewodin, Laurie, Brown

HF: Spargo, Johnson, Melksham

F: Mentha, Jefferson, Fullerton

FOLL: Campbell, Culley, Hardie

IC: Verrall, Smith, George, Baldi, Yze

EMERG: Sruk, K.Windsor, Doultree

Edited by WERRIDEE

  • Author
1 hour ago, John Demonic said:

I know of C for Caleb, but who's the other Windsor?

Kai he plays for Casey is the brother of Caleb.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 94 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 354 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies