Jump to content

Featured Replies

I'll say it again...so excited about Langford I reckon we've got an absolute ripper with this kid, can't wait to see him on the field in 2025 reckon we're in for a treat and he will be right in there with the big boys!

 
3 hours ago, Slartibartfast said:

Oliver.  2 Brownlow votes in his first game and arguably BOG to half time.

Was that the first game of the season SB?

14 hours ago, adonski said:

You're watching the wrong highlights if that's the case

Indeed. In fact in the vison I've seen his contested marking is a real strength.

I'll find the vid and link here (the youtube channel is called Footy Stuff), but I watched his full season highlights a week or so ago. About 15 minutes long.

Great video - broken up into sections: movement, score involvements, clearances, something else - and marking

Terrific way to structure it.

Boy, oh boy, kid can play.

Beautiful kick. Uses the natural advantage left footers have - opponents instinctively covering the right side - to wheel and kick off one step after a mark.

But what really stood out was his marking technique - text book.

Times his jump super well, marks out in front if his eyes with bent arms, great one on one and a one grabber. And in that vid took some absolute pack mark screamers.

He looks a completely natural forward.

He actually reminded me a lot of Jeremy Cameron, even more than say a big bodied mid forward like Tracc.

Tracc is brutally effective as a forward, but to my eye has never been a particularly natural forward. Just very hard to beat one on one.

But Langford moves and leads like a true forward.

And moves a lot like Cameron, is probably almost as tall and of course is also a left footer.

Edited by binman

 
16 minutes ago, binman said:

Indeed. In fact in the vison I've seen his contested marking is a real strength.

I'll find the vid and link here (the youtube channel is called Footy Stuff), but I watched his full season highlights a week or so ago. About 15 minutes long.

Great video - broken up into sections: movement, score involvements, clearances, something else - and marking

Terrific way to structure it.

Boy, oh boy, kid can play.

Beautiful kick. Uses the natural advantage left footers have - opponents instinctively covering the right side - to wheel and kick off one step after a mark.

But what really stood out was his marking technique - text book.

Times his jump super well, marks out in front if his eyes with bent arms, great one on one and a one grabber. And in that vid took some absolute pack mark screamers.

He looks a completely natural forward.

He actually reminded me a lot of Jeremy Cameron, even more than say a big bodied mid forward like Tracc.

Tracc is brutally effective as a forward, but to my eye has never been a particularly natural forward. Just very hard to beat one on one.

But Langford moves and leads like a true forward.

And moves a lot like Cameron, is probably almost as tall and of course is also a left footer.

I agree with most of that Binno just testing out the thumbs down sorry!!!

44 minutes ago, adonski said:

I agree with most of that Binno just testing out the thumbs down sorry!!!

All good - I thought it was a map of Texas.


1 hour ago, binman said:

Indeed. In fact in the vison I've seen his contested marking is a real strength.

I'll find the vid and link here (the youtube channel is called Footy Stuff), but I watched his full season highlights a week or so ago. About 15 minutes long.

Great video - broken up into sections: movement, score involvements, clearances, something else - and marking

Terrific way to structure it.

Boy, oh boy, kid can play.

Beautiful kick. Uses the natural advantage left footers have - opponents instinctively covering the right side - to wheel and kick off one step after a mark.

But what really stood out was his marking technique - text book.

Times his jump super well, marks out in front if his eyes with bent arms, great one on one and a one grabber. And in that vid took some absolute pack mark screamers.

He looks a completely natural forward.

He actually reminded me a lot of Jeremy Cameron, even more than say a big bodied mid forward like Tracc.

Tracc is brutally effective as a forward, but to my eye has never been a particularly natural forward. Just very hard to beat one on one.

But Langford moves and leads like a true forward.

And moves a lot like Cameron, is probably almost as tall and of course is also a left footer.

Agree with your observations Binman. 

I watched these highlights last night, it's a terrific video. Although the knock on him is his pace he still seems to have a quick few steps out of stoppage and has a mean side step. 

2 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Round 1 2016 win over GWS at the MCG by under a goal.

Shows how talented he was/is as he was a ways off elite fitness at that point.

 
28 minutes ago, binman said:

Shows how talented he was/is as he was a ways off elite fitness at that point.

Oliver shape shifted the club.

Rd 1:

After 2 minutes it was obvious he was our best centre bounce clearance player in the club

After 5 minutes: He was the teams best tackle breaker in the club

At 1/4 time he was the clubs best midfielder

At half time he was our best  first performed draftee in memory

At the end of the game he was the best on ground for us

After Rd 6 he was the clubs best player

After 50 games he was hea dand shoulders above any 50 game MFC player in memory

Then he won 4 x BF, multiple AA and a Premiership superstar to boot with a spine tingling 3rd quarter goal with a point to all of us in lockdown.

 

This guy is a freaking living legend. And some people talk about him as though is dispensable. Not in my books. Stoke whatever fire is needed to float his boat.

Edited by Wizard of Koz

I don't think Langford is going to be likened to anyone, he's a massive point of difference aerially and with his left foot.

Could be a metres gained player like Hayden Young or a physical presence like Trac, who knows. 


I like the comparison to Cameron and it is not the first time I've heard that. Maybe Mick Ablett? Or Sheehan? Its that natural forward craft that is really tough for midfielders at junior levels to learn because they are always used on ball. 

56 minutes ago, binman said:

Shows how talented he was/is as he was a ways off elite fitness at that point.

I remember in his first praccy match (vs Bulldogs at a country venue I can’t remember), he almost took a speccy, ran to the bench soon after and threw up. Immediate thought was that this kid will go until his body, not his mind, just blows up. In a good way. 

9 minutes ago, Webber said:

I remember in his first praccy match (vs Bulldogs at a country venue I can’t remember), he almost took a speccy, ran to the bench soon after and threw up. Immediate thought was that this kid will go until his body, not his mind, just blows up. In a good way. 

'You go til you can't go no more'

3 hours ago, Kent said:

why and under what circumstances do we lose CP? You mean he gets badly injured again or he retires hurt or what?

Settle down pal. Only talking about that we should be ok if Tracc chooses to leave.

On 28/11/2024 at 16:27, Webber said:

I remember in his first praccy match (vs Bulldogs at a country venue I can’t remember), he almost took a speccy, ran to the bench soon after and threw up. Immediate thought was that this kid will go until his body, not his mind, just blows up. In a good way. 

And that is the exact approach he took last season.

Obviously he wasn't AFL elite fit. But unlike some of his teamates, not once did he stop giving his all or 100% effort.

Sure, knock the bloke for not being in shape (though of course there are mitigating factors), but i couldn't believe some of the criticism he copped last season on this forum.

Bloke left not a drop on the field. You can't ask for anything more.

My respect grew for clarry last season.

Edited by binman


2 hours ago, binman said:

And that is the exact approach he took last year.

Obviously he wasn't AFL elite fit. But unlike some of his teamates, not once did he stop giving his all or 100% effort.

Sure, knock the bloke for not being in shape (though of course there are mitigating factors), but i couldn't believe some of the criticism he copped last season on this forum.

Bloke left not a drop on the field. You can't ask for anything more.

My respect grew for clarry last season.

I went along to every game at the G last year and in all but one or two games I spotted Clayton throwing up on the field. He quite literally tried his guts out last season when his body wasn't ready for it. I think last year might go down in some sort of folklore in terms of a player managing to play 21 AFL games as a full time midfielder after having such a well documented, problematic off season with very little preseason training/conditioning. 

He's looking in prime condition already this off season. I think he'll have a monster 2025 and return to a top 10 mid of the comp.

15 hours ago, binman said:

Indeed. In fact in the vison I've seen his contested marking is a real strength.

I'll find the vid and link here (the youtube channel is called Footy Stuff), but I watched his full season highlights a week or so ago. About 15 minutes long.

Great video - broken up into sections: movement, score involvements, clearances, something else - and marking

 

 Here's the video, I think the part that got me the most excited is in the first couple of mins when he's on Richmonds VFL team, bounces off 2 blokes inside 50 and finds the teammate instead of blazing away. Physically he's big enough to play.

Looks like a Bontempelli type to me.

Big bodied Mid/forward with footy smarts who covers the ground exceptionally well.

Great hands and goal kicking ability and powerful in  middle of the ground as well.

8 hours ago, Hawny for Gawny said:

 Here's the video, I think the part that got me the most excited is in the first couple of mins when he's on Richmonds VFL team, bounces off 2 blokes inside 50 and finds the teammate instead of blazing away. Physically he's big enough to play.

'Oh, Langford - outstanding work from the young man!'

Edited by binman


On 28/11/2024 at 07:29, binman said:

Agree. I was joking, though not particularly well

if I was a betting man I'd give very short odds that barrimg injury he'll make his AFL debut round one next season.

I can't think of a dees draftee more ready for AFL footy than Langford . Viney perhaps, 

And not just because he's physically ready (boy, he's a big fella) - just seems to have the right mindset and competitiveness.

He'll probably be a mid from the get go too.

Ah fair enough lol

 

Let’s hope — I think that’d be a huge tick if so. Otherwise his size finishing and marking make him the perfect fwd for us either when resting to maybe he’ll do stoppage then move fwd.. either way he’s def in R1, would love to see Windsor inside a bit as well in bursts!

On 28/11/2024 at 11:58, binman said:

Indeed. In fact in the vison I've seen his contested marking is a real strength.

I'll find the vid and link here (the youtube channel is called Footy Stuff), but I watched his full season highlights a week or so ago. About 15 minutes long.

Great video - broken up into sections: movement, score involvements, clearances, something else - and marking

Terrific way to structure it.

Boy, oh boy, kid can play.

Beautiful kick. Uses the natural advantage left footers have - opponents instinctively covering the right side - to wheel and kick off one step after a mark.

But what really stood out was his marking technique - text book.

Times his jump super well, marks out in front if his eyes with bent arms, great one on one and a one grabber. And in that vid took some absolute pack mark screamers.

He looks a completely natural forward.

He actually reminded me a lot of Jeremy Cameron, even more than say a big bodied mid forward like Tracc.

Tracc is brutally effective as a forward, but to my eye has never been a particularly natural forward. Just very hard to beat one on one.

But Langford moves and leads like a true forward.

And moves a lot like Cameron, is probably almost as tall and of course is also a left footer.

Sure is — his marking may be his best asset although his finishing and attack at contest would be close! 

1 hour ago, Tolstoys Nudge said:

Ah fair enough lol

 

Let’s hope — I think that’d be a huge tick if so. Otherwise his size finishing and marking make him the perfect fwd for us either when resting to maybe he’ll do stoppage then move fwd.. either way he’s def in R1, would love to see Windsor inside a bit as well in bursts!

I'm on the fence about using Windsor as a mid.

Small sample size, but he didn't scream natural mid go me.

But we have other options and players as quick as Windsor are gold in footy now so I'd rather he play on the wing where he can really use his wheels.

 
4 minutes ago, binman said:

I'm on the fence about using Windsor as a mid.

Small sample size, but he didn't scream natural mid go me.

But we have other options and players as quick as Windsor are gold in footy now so I'd rather he play on the wing where he can really use his wheels.

Zero is a small sample size for sure

5 minutes ago, binman said:

I'm on the fence about using Windsor as a mid.

Small sample size, but he didn't scream natural mid go me.

But we have other options and players as quick as Windsor are gold in footy now so I'd rather he play on the wing where he can really use his wheels.

Windsor has excellent hands and decision making in tight. I think he will be an excellent midfielder once he gets the body strength.

I much prefer having left footed and right footed wingmen, because it allows us to move the ball more quickly around the boundary. Langdon, Sharp, Winsor and Lindsay give us a few options for the wing.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 197 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 515 replies