Jump to content

Dan Houston

dazzledavey36
dazzledavey36
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

We really are determined to follow Richmond into mediocrity if we make short term list management decisions at the expense of longer term improvements. Just ask them how the Jacob Hopper trade is working out. 

The only way forward for this group is to bring in quality kids with high draft picks. Anything else is Goodwin trying to save his own [censored]. 

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    • Haha 1
    • Clap 1
     
    19 minutes ago, poita said:

    We really are determined to follow Richmond into mediocrity if we make short term list management decisions at the expense of longer term improvements. Just ask them how the Jacob Hopper trade is working out. 

    The only way forward for this group is to bring in quality kids with high draft picks. Anything else is Goodwin trying to save his own [censored]. 

    Firstly Houston is a far better player than Jacob Hopper (or Tim Taranto for that matter)

    Secondly our list is in a far better position to contend and far more balanced on age profile than Richmond’s was at the end of 2022

    Our only top line players over 30 next year will be Max, May and Viney (TMac and Melksham too if they continue on)

    Meanwhile we have the likes of Trac, Oliver, Lever, Fritsch, Langdon and ANB in their prime years

    Not to mention a strong cohort of younger players who are starting to become stars in their own right - Kozzy, Rivers, JVR, McVee, Windsor to name a few 

    Richmond were super top heavy with all their best players over 30 and nearing the end of their careers, with essentially no top line talent in either the middle or younger age bracket of their list (save for a couple of players like Bolton and Balta)

    I get that we need to balance contending with bringing in young talent from the top of the draft, but I think we’re in a far better position to do so than either Richmond or West Coast have been in recent years when they’ve traded away picks to try and keep their windows open with essentially no young talent already on their lists 

    Edited by demoncat

  • Quote
    • Like 5

    If Houston was a free agent, by all means get him. But a running half back/wing is not our most pressing need. Giving up 1st round draft picks for a 27yo, who doesn't move the needle, is poor list management.

    If the club genuinely believes we are still in a premiership window, then use draft capital on addressing our obvious needs.  Houston is an upgrade on Hunter and Billings, but that's setting the bar low.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
     
    1 minute ago, demoncat said:

    Firstly Houston is a far better player than Jacob Hopper (or Tim Taranto for that matter)

    Secondly our list is in a far better position to contend and far more balanced on age profile than Richmond’s was at the end of 2022

    Our only top line players over 30 next year will be Max, May and Viney (TMac and Melksham too if they continue on)

    Meanwhile we have the likes of Trac, Oliver, Lever, Fritsch, Langdon and ANB in their prime years

    Not to mention a strong cohort of younger players who are starting to become stars in their own right - Kozzy, Rivers, JVR, McVee, Windsor to name a few 

    Richmond were super top heavy with all their best players over 30 and nearing the end of there careers, with essentially no top line talent in either the middle or younger age bracket of their list (save for a couple of players like Bolton Balta)

    I get that we need to balance contending with bringing in young talent from the top of the draft, but I think we’re in a far better position to do so than either Richmond or West Coast have been in recent years when they’re traded away picks to try and keep their windows open with essentially no young talent already on their lists 

    You lost me when you compared Houston to Taranto.

  • Quote
    4 minutes ago, mo64 said:

    You lost me when you compared Houston to Taranto.

    Yeah pretty sure I’d take a player who is rated the second best kick in the entire comp over a bloke who can get 30 but who butchers every possession  

    I thought people have been crying out for us to improve our kicking skills? Now we target someone who would improve us massively in that regard and we shouldn’t ask the question?

    Edited by demoncat

  • Quote
    • Like 8

    13 minutes ago, mo64 said:

    You lost me when you compared Houston to Taranto.

    Taranto is a just a run of the mill plodder

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Two first rounders for Houston would be crazy IMO. No doubting his quality as a player but realistically we’d only be getting 2-3 quality seasons out of him before he declines. We also need a bit of rejuvenation on the list with Gawn, May, Lever, Salem and even Trac and Clarry starting to get on the older side of things. I don’t think we should be chips in for a flag anymore, that ship has sailed.

    If Houston was 24 and playing the way he is I’d have no qualms with it, but that kind of bounty shouldn’t be wasted on a 28 year old ,unless it was prime Dusty or GAJ.

    For comparison we traded a single first rounder, pick 6, for Steven May who was younger and a better player than Houston. In a more important position too. And even THAT was borderline overs, luckily May has been awesome for us. 
     

     

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    7 minutes ago, poita said:

    We really are determined to follow Richmond into mediocrity if we make short term list management decisions at the expense of longer term improvements. Just ask them how the Jacob Hopper trade is working out. 

    The only way forward for this group is to bring in quality kids with high draft picks. Anything else is Goodwin trying to save his own [censored]. 

    I get your point. We really are at a juncture at the moment. I still think we have a premiership capable team. Despite Gawn's age, he is still at his peak - or close to it. May for me, is the one that is starting to show his age. 

    Our midfield isn't old - actually its right where you want it to be to have a crack at a flag. ANB, Trac and Oliver and bang smack in their prime years, Rivers, Kozzy, McVee, Sparrow our young brigade. Windsor a puppy and Lingers still running strong. Viney is likely past his peak, but is still servicable and will give 100%.

    So do we shut up shop and do a mini rebuild? Its a real hard one and i change my perspective on this everyday. W

    Houston straightens us up and opens up a plethora of options. Frankly Bowey and Salem have been underperforming for a while and i think it shows with our ball movement and rebound. 

  • Quote
    • Like 3
     
    31 minutes ago, mo64 said:

    If Houston was a free agent, by all means get him. But a running half back/wing is not our most pressing need. Giving up 1st round draft picks for a 27yo, who doesn't move the needle, is poor list management.

    If the club genuinely believes we are still in a premiership window, then use draft capital on addressing our obvious needs.  Houston is an upgrade on Hunter and Billings, but that's setting the bar low.

    He's rated 2nd best inside 50 kick in the AFL. He's in his absolute prime. I'm on board doing it.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Either way we are going to be very active this trade period.

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    7 minutes ago, Bang Bang Bang said:

    Two first rounders for Houston would be crazy IMO. No doubting his quality as a player but realistically we’d only be getting 2-3 quality seasons out of him before he declines. We also need a bit of rejuvenation on the list with Gawn, May, Lever, Salem and even Trac and Clarry starting to get on the older side of things. I don’t think we should be chips in for a flag anymore, that ship has sailed.

    If Houston was 24 and playing the way he is I’d have no qualms with it, but that kind of bounty shouldn’t be wasted on a 28 year old ,unless it was prime Dusty or GAJ.

    For comparison we traded a single first rounder, pick 6, for Steven May who was younger and a better player than Houston. In a more important position too. And even THAT was borderline overs, luckily May has been awesome for us. 

    My main concern with the rejuvenation is the arrival of the Tasmanian team. 

    We're still in the window now, but we're not leading the pack like we were last few years and lots of teams can  now win the comp. So it would be a risk trading early picks for a player at this peak given whats on the horizon. But with trades like this, you can only judge the success depending on the future outcome.

    He'd definitely improve the team though

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    1 hour ago, reynolds46 said:

    If Houston has made his intentions clear that he wants out, this will become a distraction for Port Adelaide and they should 100% trade him and offer up their first pick to the MFC to get him off their books whilst continuing to pay a large portion of his salary. 

    I cannot believe Cornes hasn't suggested this yet.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
    55 minutes ago, mo64 said:

    You lost me when you compared Houston to Taranto.

    Lol, and I bet you spend half your time complaining we don't have enough good ball users. Houston is an elite kick that could not only play half back, but play through the middle, ie in our midfield, so addresses a direct need.

    Taranto, despite being a Melbourne supporter growing up, is a slow player who butchers the ball.

    I bet you'd be screaming for us to trade Taranto if he were at Melbourne...

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Which DH “ journalist” initiated the BS that a trade will only get done if we give up 2 first rounders? I’m sure no one at Port said this. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    1 minute ago, Neil Crompton said:

    Which DH “ journalist” initiated the BS that a trade will only get done if we give up 2 first rounders? I’m sure no one at Port said this. 

    Jay Clark and the midweek tackle gang on Fox. Likely as their teams  aren’t chasing him.

    But he’s ultimately named his destination which like LJ lowers his price somewhat. I think we work closely with Freo to split our pick and stay in the draft this year as best as well can. 
     

    Freo are much beater positioned to go with two top 10 picks vs 1 + 2 late first rounders. But I am biased. 

  • Quote
    5 hours ago, poita said:

    We really are determined to follow Richmond into mediocrity if we make short term list management decisions at the expense of longer term improvements. Just ask them how the Jacob Hopper trade is working out. 

    The only way forward for this group is to bring in quality kids with high draft picks. Anything else is Goodwin trying to save his own [censored]. 

    He would be a fine replacement for Gus

  • Quote
    3 hours ago, Gawndy the Great said:

    Jay Clark and the midweek tackle gang on Fox. Likely as their teams  aren’t chasing him.

    But he’s ultimately named his destination which like LJ lowers his price somewhat. I think we work closely with Freo to split our pick and stay in the draft this year as best as well can. 
     

    Freo are much beater positioned to go with two top 10 picks vs 1 + 2 late first rounders. But I am biased. 

    The issue is Dan Houston is contracted, whereas Jacko wasn't.

    If he is hellbent on leaving then often a club will eventually get the deal done, but there will e a fair bit of haggling in this one I'd say.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    2 minutes ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

    The issue is Dan Houston is contracted, whereas Jacko wasn't.

    If he is hellbent on leaving then often a club will eventually get the deal done, but there will e a fair bit of haggling in this one I'd say.

    Potentially - i dont recall how Power are on the trade front. We do have a reputation of being easy to deal - no doubt the SA's will try to take advantage of that situation. It would be good for us to have a few options running to minimise the perception of desperation. 

  • Quote
    Just now, Gawndy the Great said:

    Potentially - i dont recall how Power are on the trade front. We do have a reputation of being easy to deal - no doubt the SA's will try to take advantage of that situation. It would be good for us to have a few options running to minimise the perception of desperation. 

    I don't think we are easy to deal with, so much as we are happy to pay fair value for a player without haggling over small things.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    5 hours ago, demoncat said:

    Firstly Houston is a far better player than Jacob Hopper (or Tim Taranto for that matter)

    Secondly our list is in a far better position to contend and far more balanced on age profile than Richmond’s was at the end of 2022

    Our only top line players over 30 next year will be Max, May and Viney (TMac and Melksham too if they continue on)

    Meanwhile we have the likes of Trac, Oliver, Lever, Fritsch, Langdon and ANB in their prime years

    Not to mention a strong cohort of younger players who are starting to become stars in their own right - Kozzy, Rivers, JVR, McVee, Windsor to name a few 

    Richmond were super top heavy with all their best players over 30 and nearing the end of their careers, with essentially no top line talent in either the middle or younger age bracket of their list (save for a couple of players like Bolton and Balta)

    I get that we need to balance contending with bringing in young talent from the top of the draft, but I think we’re in a far better position to do so than either Richmond or West Coast have been in recent years when they’ve traded away picks to try and keep their windows open with essentially no young talent already on their lists 

    Excellent summary of the Tiges comparison - none at all really.  Could add in Clarko's faiure to build the hawks on the run - remember Jaeger O'meara anyone.

    Our profile is ripe for quality top up in some areas. Just needs to be well managed.

    After reading this afternoons Age update on Trac's progress, and the steps are younger players have taken, looking forward to 2025,  and tomorrow night.  I expect to beat Gws,

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    21 minutes ago, Gawndy the Great said:

    Potentially - i dont recall how Power are on the trade front. We do have a reputation of being easy to deal - no doubt the SA's will try to take advantage of that situation. It would be good for us to have a few options running to minimise the perception of desperation. 

    I had a quick look at their trade history and there's nothing outlandish and they all seem ok to reasonable trades:

    Paid a F2 for Alir (Syd)

    Received Pick 12 and a F3 for Pick 16 and Peter Ladhams (Syd)

    Paid basically R2 plus late picks for Sweet (Dogs) & P50 (wouldn't have done that one personally but each to their own)

    F2 tied to Freo for Soldo (Toiges).

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     
    59 minutes ago, Deelectable said:

    Sparrow & F2?

    If that alone gets it done, I'd be staggered. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Essendon

      As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Essendon

      Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

        • Clap
        • Haha
        • Like
      • 478 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 05

      Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • 123 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Geelong

      There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Geelong

      I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 04

      Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • 273 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All