Jump to content

Featured Replies

I don't see the big deal with Adelaide dropping Rachele. He's a young player, and the Crows obviously have given him things to work out that he isn't doing. It could be things that to the naked eye are impossible to judge, like two way running or pressure acts etc. 

It's definitely not unusual for a young player, especially one in a role where it is difficult to always be making an impact, to be dropped. 

I highly doubt they would even entertain trading him.

 
31 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

I don't see the big deal with Adelaide dropping Rachele. He's a young player, and the Crows obviously have given him things to work out that he isn't doing. It could be things that to the naked eye are impossible to judge, like two way running or pressure acts etc. 

It's definitely not unusual for a young player, especially one in a role where it is difficult to always be making an impact, to be dropped. 

I highly doubt they would even entertain trading him.

It's the fact you could give him the off season to work on those things, not drop him for the last game.

I agree it's doubtful they'd entertain trading him, but I think it's worth asking the question if we believe he is in the top 2 or 3 targets we have and can make it work within our TPP.

I wouldn't want him being paid more than Kozzy for example. But you do sometimes have to pay a premium to lure a player away.

I'd just hope the lure of Melbourne (the city) is enough, and playing in a better team.

 

I know Rachele has stagnated somewhat, but he's a very talented player and still only 21.

He was interviewed on SEN in the preseason and stated that most of his friends barrack for Melbourne.

I put this down to being from Shepparton, which was Melbourne's zone back in the old days.

I hope we're going hard for him.

2 minutes ago, Gator said:

I know Rachele has stagnated somewhat, but he's a very talented player and still only 21.

He was interviewed on SEN in the preseason and stated that most of his friends barrack for Melbourne.

I put this down to being from Shepparton, which was Melbourne's zone back in the old days.

I hope we're going hard for him.

Me too.

Has a natural instinct for goal that only Kozzy and Fritta have in our forwardline.


Not sure if it is just because of the weekend's performance, but I think the talls in our forward line are looking ok (particularly with the development of Jefferson).  In my view it has been getting better most of the season and it is more the midfield that has let us down this year (which makes sense given the personel).  It really comes down to good ball movement and skills.

If we could clone Windsor a few times, that is the sort of player we need more of - fast, good skills, good decision making and surprisingly good in the contest.  I guess you could say McVee also has these qualities.

I also think the Houston interest is about having more players in the back half that can open up the game on transition.  We don't have too many players that open up the game with long accurate kicking.  Melksham is one of the few that does it in our team every now and then when he roams further up the field.  Given our athletic / mobile medium-tall forwards - particularly Disco, Fritsch, Melkshem and McAdam (haven't given up on him), having an extra player or two that can kick accurately over 50m would help us enormously.

 

So while they'd be helpful and great gets, I'm not sure Waterman or Rachele are really going to get bang for buck

 

Massive upside Tim Lamb get in contact with him and make him feel good, stroke the ego and show the love

 

5 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

ANB for Rachele. Not the worst idea 🤣🤣🤣

anb for rachele + we get our second round pick back that we gave up for mcadam

nibbs is a far superior player and we'd be paying a hefty long term contract for a player who isn't in the best 23 for a side in the bottom 4

Edited by whatwhat say what

I'd happily give up our future first for Rachele. He is a gun.

ANB + F1 for Rachele, and maybe a future pick or two so we're loaded up next year for Ah-Mu.

Edited by Adam The God

1 hour ago, Gator said:

I know Rachele has stagnated somewhat, but he's a very talented player and still only 21.

He was interviewed on SEN in the preseason and stated that most of his friends barrack for Melbourne.

I put this down to being from Shepparton, which was Melbourne's zone back in the old days.

I hope we're going hard for him.

It could also be that he went to Caulfield Grammar. There were quite a few of us back in my day.

1 hour ago, Adam The God said:

It could also be that he went to Caulfield Grammar. There were quite a few of us back in my day.

I found the interview from February this year.

He briefly mentions that a lot of his friends barrack for Melbourne and that they would have ''come down'' to the G to watch him if he wasn't suspended.  That assumes coming down from Shepparton.  The old zone connection makes sense to me.

Very briefly mentioned at around 4.30.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2024/02/05/how-talented-but-fiery-crow-plans-to-take-his-game-to-the-next-level-in-2024/


As we have academy players and father sons hopefully coming to us next year through the draft , will that mean we will look to trade out picks for 2024 draft as they will be consumed for matching bids ?

40 minutes ago, Melonmonster said:

As we have academy players and father sons hopefully coming to us next year through the draft , will that mean we will look to trade out picks for 2024 draft as they will be consumed for matching bids ?

all depends on when / if the afl head office announce the changes to the points and the requirements of proximity to picks

6 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

all depends on when / if the afl head office announce the changes to the points and the requirements of proximity to picks

I’d imagine the clubs and recruiters would have a fair idea already 

There’s no denying his ability, but imagine him in our forward line 😩. It would come out even faster than it does now.

Rachele = 0 forward pressure.

19 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

There’s no denying his ability, but imagine him in our forward line 😩. It would come out even faster than it does now.

Rachele = 0 forward pressure.

So if we trade Fritta for Rachelle it comes out the same as it does now?


20 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

sure, and minus about 40 goals a season too

Rachele has kicked 30 as a 21 year old, and has a decade of footy ahead.

I'm not advocating that trade, I'm just pointing out that defensive pressure isn't a reason to not recruit someone. And the club could trade Fritsch and we'd be no different on that end.

Edited by John Demonic

I don't think Rachele is as bad defensively as some are making out, but the forward pressure question is different depending on the game style being played.

With a forward half territory game, inside 50 tackles are essential.

But if we look to go a little quicker (think 2018 style corridor footy), hopefully we capitalise on inside 50s and convert them before the ball has a chance to ping out.

 

If there Is even the slightest bit of unrest with Rachelle at Adelaide we simply have to enquire.  And work it in the ANB trade, we could seriously get a steal here.

1 hour ago, Travy14 said:

If there Is even the slightest bit of unrest with Rachelle at Adelaide we simply have to enquire.  And work it in the ANB trade, we could seriously get a steal here.

He sounds a bit flaky but has talent.

He has pulled out of a few contests, which Goody is not a real fan of.

How about ANB and McAdam?

Seriously, he is on a big contract and I wonder how that would play out.

Edited by Redleg


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Brisbane

    And just like that, we’re Narrm again. Even though the annual AFL Sir Doug Nicholls Round which commemorates the contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture to our game has been a welcome addition to our calendar for ten years, more lately it has been a portent of tough times ahead for we beleaguered Narrm supporters. Ever since the club broke through for its historic 2021 premiership, this has become a troubling time of the year for the club. For example, it all began when Melbourne rebranded itself as Narrm across the two rounds of the Sir Doug Nicholls Round to become the first club to adopt an Indigenous club name especially for the occasion. It won its first outing under the brand against lowly North Melbourne to go to 10 wins and no losses but not without a struggle or a major injury to  star winger Ed Langdon who broke his ribs and missed several weeks. In the following week, still as Narrm, the team’s 17 game winning streak came to an end at the hands of the Dockers. That came along with more injuries, a plague that remained with them for the remainder of the season until, beset by injuries, the Dees were eliminated from the finals in straight sets. It was even worse last year, when Narrm inexplicably lowered its colours in Perth to the Waalit Marawar Eagles. Oh, the shame of it all! At least this year, if there is a corner to turn around, it has to be in the direction of something better. To that end, I produced a special pre-game chant in the local Narrm language - “nam mi:wi winnamun katjil prolin ambi ngamar thamelin amb” which roughly translated is “every heart beats true for the red and the blue.” >y belief is that if all of the Narrm faithful recite it long enough, then it might prove to be the only way to beat the Brisbane Lions at the Gabba on Sunday. The Lions are coming off a disappointing draw at Marvel Stadium against a North Melbourne team that lacks the ability and know how to win games (except when playing Melbourne). Brisbane are, however, a different kettle of fish at home and have very few positional weaknesses. They are a midfield powerhouse, strong in defence and have plenty of forward options, particularly their small and medium sized players, to kick a winning score this week after the sting of last week’s below par performance.

      • Thumb Down
    • 5 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Hawthorn

    There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Footscray

    At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Brisbane

    The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 136 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Hawthorn

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Haha
      • Love
      • Like
    • 52 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Hawthorn

    Wayward kicking for goal, dump kicks inside 50 and some baffling umpiring all contributed to the Dees not getting out to an an early lead that may have impacted the result. At the end of the day the Demons were just not good enough and let the Hawks run away with their first win against the Demons in 7 years.

      • Thumb Down
      • Like
    • 376 replies
    Demonland