Jump to content

Featured Replies

19 hours ago, Demonland said:

Β 

South Australians drafted by the Melbourne Football Club and the players taken before them by Adelaide:

2019

Pick 6 - Fisher McAsey

Pick 12 - Kysaiah Pickett 😈

2018

Pick 9 - Chayce Jones

Pick 16 - Ned McHenry

Pick 27 - Tom Sparrow 😈

Rookie - Kade Chandler 😈

2017

Pick 12 - Darcy Fogarty

Pick 37 - Harrison Petty 😈

2014

Pick 14 - Jake Lever (damn)

Pick 35 - Harrison Wigg

Pick 40 - Alex Neal-Bullen  😈

This should be a news article.

Β 
12 hours ago, Jontee said:

so we is them the MFC....and they are the MFC....you said it friend,Β 

Weally and twooly, does it matter?????? Or, as I might ask my dear Missus: Please don't be so pedantic.

11 hours ago, jnrmac said:

Adelaide played on the Friday night night in Perth and flew back late. A 6 day break. No real difference to us on a 5 day break with no travel.Β 

I agree to a point.

But with the way we play, in particular our incredibly aerobically taxing all team defence and the distances all players have to cover (10 plus ks minimum) backing up after only 5 days is very difficult.

It's all about recovery, and even one less day than the oppo makes a big difference.Β 

They were clearly paddling in the last quarter,Β  so were the crows,Β  but I think we are fitter, which made a difference.

Tracc talked post game about how hard they found it.

I've been tracking the impact of the break between games for almost a decade for punting purposes. And there is no doubt when a team has to back up inside 7 days, and the oppo has an extra day break its a huge factor. It's something i always factor in.

Edited by binman

 
27 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Or a Greek about humility (speaking from experience 🀣)

That's a myth.

By which I mean it's very true.


7 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

You've never really shaken off that Oedipus thing have you ?

Schmoedious, as long as he loves his mother.

19 hours ago, jnrmac said:

We are disciplined about not committing too many numbers to the contest. Unlike, say, Collingwood last year.

We trust our players to win contest but if they don't we have players on the outside to sweat on the the oppo players. That per se would see us lose ground ball gets but be better off tactically

Your point is correct except for the point there being , if you have the number outside the contest we need to be rewarded , which it doesn't appear to me as though we are.

58 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Or a Greek about humility (speaking from experience 🀣)

Or an American about class. They think it was something they sat in at school.

Β 
1 hour ago, Biffen said:

You can't teach a South Australian about class.Or a Kiwi about Style.Or a Russian about humour.

The trouble with South Australians is the Sassenachs outnumber the Germans, hence the lack of class. And as far as humour goes, you obviously are not aware that a German joke is no laughing matter.

56 minutes ago, binman said:

I agree to a point.

But with the way we play, in particular our incredibly aerobically taxing all team defence and the distances all players have to cover 10 plus ks) backing up after only 5 days is very difficult.

It's all about recovery, and even one less day than the oppo makes a big difference.Β 

They were clearly paddling in the last quarter,Β  so eere the crowsΒ  but I think we are finger, which made s difference.

Tracc talked post game about how hard they found it.

I've been tracking the impact of the break between games for almost a decade for punting purposes. And there is no doubt when a team has to back up inside 7 days and the oppo had an extra day break its a huge factor. It's something i always factor in.

I think this is a good point. Β If you look at the afl tracker, we consistently outwork (outrun) every team we play because we have to with our defensive system. Β Interestingly, the crows actually shaded us for work rate last week (both sides did a lot of high speed running - 39km v 40km which is way above average).

For all the dismissive comments about the game, I thought it was our best performance this season because of how hard the crows worked. Β They got a lot of numbers to contests, won more ground balls, but we shut them down anyway with great system and pressure, and absolutely burnt them when we had it. Β Shots at goal from 58% of our forward 50 entries has to be our best effort for a long time.


2 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Or a Greek about humility (speaking from experience 🀣)

You know what they say Gonz...

The Greeks invented sex, but the Italians introduced women to the activity

Even though I thought Mayzies selection was a bit contentious and coming off a 5 day break I felt that we had the Crows measure and after watching the last half several times I feel we probably should have won by more. Ours was a total team effort, defence lead by Steven was excellent, pressure was immense, we have a tough, well drilled team that trusts each other. Tracc, Max, a banged up Clayton an ill Jack an improving Sparrow a feisty Kozzie backed up by Chin and ANB who received a lot of opposition attention were simply better. When you throw in our younger brigade the freakish Judd McVee, the electric Duke of Windsor, the tough unflinching JVR and the confidence building Blake Howes we have improved our team. Add in Rick, Riv, Salo, Lingers, Fritta, TMac, BB, Petty, Billings and an emerging Taj Woewodin we have a great spread of experience and youth. I loved that 3rd quarter where we won the game.

On 04/04/2024 at 23:09, GBDee said:

Twomey has suggested that, given their poor start, Adelaide wouldn’t want to have to deal such a high (top 5 atm) pick to us and will wait until his contract runs down in two years. This might actually strengthen our hand in any upcoming extension talks.

well without a high pick what would we accept ?Β 

8 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Just remind them he chose success over money πŸ˜‰

What I found bewildering is they were booing Petty early in the game. Like, aren't they trying to woo him? Or are they going for the whole treat them mean, keep them keen approach?

Β 

Β Looking at the lists, God Bless JT, and from fond memories of Football Park, clearly it was a state game ... SA A. versus SA B.Β 

Obvious that the locals resented having to support the B team.

Edited by DEE fence
From from

12 hours ago, binman said:

I agree to a point.

But with the way we play, in particular our incredibly aerobically taxing all team defence and the distances all players have to cover (10 plus ks minimum) backing up after only 5 days is very difficult.

It's all about recovery, and even one less day than the oppo makes a big difference.Β 

They were clearly paddling in the last quarter,Β  so were the crows,Β  but I think we are fitter, which made a difference.

Tracc talked post game about how hard they found it.

I've been tracking the impact of the break between games for almost a decade for punting purposes. And there is no doubt when a team has to back up inside 7 days, and the oppo has an extra day break its a huge factor. It's something i always factor in.

Doesn't bode well for our Thursday clash against Carlton off a 5 day break in a few weeks (they get 6 days)


11 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Doesn't bode well for our Thursday clash against Carlton off a 5 day break in a few weeks (they get 6 days)

No, particularly given we play the cats in the previous round, a game likely to be pretty fierce.

Luckily we have a 10 day break before our next game - the Eagles.

Edited by binman

3 minutes ago, binman said:

Ni, particularly given we play the cats in the previous round, a game likely to be pretty fierce.

Luckily we have a 10 break before our next game - the Eagles.

The only upside is that Carlton play Collingwood the week prior.

Other downside is that it is an β€˜away’ game for us, but it is at the G so that should not stop us from rocking up and supporting our boys.

6 minutes ago, Wodjathefirst said:

The only upside is that Carlton play Collingwood the week prior.

Other downside is that it is an β€˜away’ game for us, but it is at the G so that should not stop us from rocking up and supporting our boys.

Snap. I just checked that (who blues play).

That's a pretty big upside as the pies blues game will be hyped all week in the lead up and both teams will smash each other.Β 

The other upside is we have a two week bye break a fortnight before the blues game (lions, two week break, tigers, cats, blues).

And we do t do any travel from now till after the blues game (travel caj be a factor in terms of messing with the recovery and preparation program).

So there won't be the same level of accumulative fatigue there otherwise would be.

The blues by comparison had their bye after round two (but also do not travel before our game).

And in the lead up to the dees clash they play, the crows, giants (at marvel), cats and pies.

That's a tough run - four physical and intense games - particularly the last two.

25 minutes ago, binman said:

Snap. I just checked that (who blues play).

That's a pretty big upside as the pies blues game will be hyped all week in the lead up and both teams will smash each other.Β 

The other upside is we have a two week bye break a fortnight before the blues game (lions, two week break, tigers, cats, blues).

And we do t do any travel from now till after the blues game (travel caj be a factor in terms of messing with the recovery and preparation program).

So there won't be the same level of accumulative fatigue there otherwise would be.

The blues by comparison had their bye after round two (but also do not travel before our game).

And in the lead up to the dees clash they play, the crows, giants (at marvel), cats and pies.

That's a tough run - four physical and intense games - particularly the last two.

Don’t worry about any of that we will beat them.Β 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.Β Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds.Β 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?Β Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?Β 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 528 replies