Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Demonland

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (โ‹ฎ) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Sam Van Rooyen in for Ben Brown on LTI?

Featured Replies

3 hours ago, Doug Reemer said:

With Brayshaw retiring is Sam Van Rooyen available for the mid season draft?ย 
ย 

if not, surely thereโ€™s a key forward out there somewhere!! There has to be another James Podsiadly lurking in the state leagues!

I nearly choked on my lukewarm chips and gravy! How are we back talking about drafting SVR again?!

ย 
3 minutes ago, The Jackson FIX said:

I nearly choked on my lukewarm chips and gravy! How are we back talking about drafting SVR again?!

Because someone was up at 2am and decided to attack a fellow DL poster along with Benny Brown. Posts have been thrown in the trash, this post wonโ€™t last long either I think.ย 

Edited by Dee Zephyr

4 hours ago, rjay said:

Seems to be par for course in these situations. The Rioli situation dragged on for nearly 2 years.

For whatever reason I don't know but as you say unfair.

WADA ASADA and or the AFL are denying the Magna Carta

Magna Cartaย of 1215, clause 40 of which reads, "To no one will we sell, to no one will we refuse or delay, right or justice.

ย 
5 hours ago, Redleg said:

As Smithโ€™s case has still not been dealt with, which is a disgrace in itself given the scenario, I feel we should be able to put him on the LTI list or similar and agree to pay out this year his last and have another spot for the mid season draft, if we want to use it.

It seems very unfair he canโ€™t play, but has still not had his case dealt with.ย 

The AFL is holding the decision relating to Smith over the MFC. Reasons, could be anything.ย 

5 minutes ago, Willmoy1947 said:

The AFL is holding the decision relating to Smith over the MFC. Reasons, could be anything.ย 

Are you saying that the AFL has a ruling that they are holding back? ย Seriously?

Reasons?? ย Blackmail? Corruption? Incompetence? ย 
ย 

Totally unbelievable and unacceptable if this is true. ย 


The point of this thread isnโ€™t the possible acquisition of SvR. It was never about SvR at all.ย Rather, it was created as an opportunity to disparage BBB, under the amateurish guise of interest in a replacement for him, as evidenced by the OP, and confirmed without a hint of ambiguity by the now-deleted post overnight (yes, Iโ€™ve read it, thanks to a good friend, and I truly appreciate the awesome ppl who who reacted/replied). Needless to say, BBB is a bazillion times the person a gutless online sniper is.ย 

12 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Are you saying that the AFL has a ruling that they are holding back? ย Seriously?

Reasons?? ย Blackmail? Corruption? Incompetence? ย 
ย 

Totally unbelievable and unacceptable if this is true. ย 

Would explain a few things in regard to a more than inexplicable draw, media stigmatizing, and tight, perplexingย  decision making routines this season, so far. Think about it.

42 minutes ago, Willmoy1947 said:

The AFL is holding the decision relating to Smith over the MFC. Reasons, could be anything.ย 

Considering that there are allegedly others implicated in this investigation perhaps it's no bad thing it has been delayed.ย 

ย 
51 minutes ago, Willmoy1947 said:

Would explain a few things in regard to a more than inexplicable draw, media stigmatizing, and tight, perplexingย  decision making routines this season, so far. Think about it.

A lot of investigating is out of the AFL's hands.

49 minutes ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

Considering that there are allegedly others implicated in this investigation perhaps it's no bad thing it has been delayed.ย 

Surely the only way others could be implicated is by testing positive on game day.


1 minute ago, loges said:

Surely the only way others could be implicated is by testing positive on game day.

Hi loges. It's a subject we have to skirt around obviously. The thread isn't even about JS. I'm alluding to alleged text messages that may or may not have sent. Best we move on from this topic lest it be closed down.ย 

56 minutes ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

Considering that there are allegedly others implicated in this investigation perhaps it's no bad thing it has been delayed.ย 

you mean there could be carlton or collingwood "others" and they want to bury it?

1 hour ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

The point of this thread isnโ€™t the possible acquisition of SvR. It was never about SvR at all.ย Rather, it was created as an opportunity to disparage BBB, under the amateurish guise of interest in a replacement for him, as evidenced by the OP, and confirmed without a hint of ambiguity by the now-deleted post overnight (yes, Iโ€™ve read it, thanks to a good friend, and I truly appreciate the awesome ppl who who reacted/replied). Needless to say, BBB is a bazillion times the person a gutless online sniper is.ย 

As iterated and I'll double down on it, its a NO from me, what if anything has Van Rooyen jrn shown?? BBB is a Proven forward and valuable Melbourne player and a great bloke! END OF CONVERSATION!๐Ÿคฎ

53 minutes ago, drysdale demon said:

A lot of investigating is out of the AFL's hands.

You just have to wonder if this is having an effect on players. Of course if they havenโ€™t done anything wrong then there is nothing to worry about.ย 

13 minutes ago, Gawndy the Great said:

You just have to wonder if this is having an effect on players. Of course if they havenโ€™t done anything wrong then there is nothing to worry about.ย 

I don't think it would as it only relates to an individual.


13 hours ago, Redleg said:

As Smithโ€™s case has still not been dealt with, which is a disgrace in itself given the scenario,ย 

It seems very unfair he canโ€™t play, but has still not had his case dealt with.ย 

Doesnโ€™t to me, Rioli matter was the same as were other matters under WADA in other sports.

We are in the predicament with a player down because of one person only and itโ€™s not something I will forget nor will the FD, who I understand started down the road of setting minimum standards before the positive test came to light

My god there are some dumb conspiracy theorists on this site

Thereโ€™s no precedent to look back on in world sport, ย OH Wait

I'm sending this post to NASA. Proof we are living in a multiverse.

14 hours ago, loges said:

Surely the only way others could be implicated is by testing positive on game day.

Suppliers and customers Loges

8 hours ago, Pennant St Dee said:

Doesnโ€™t to me, Rioli matter was the same as were other matters under WADA in other sports.

We are in the predicament with a player down because of one person only and itโ€™s not something I will forget nor will the FD, who I understand started down the road of setting minimum standards before the positive test came to light

Understand, but it doesnโ€™t explain why he canโ€™t be placed on LTI list and paid out as it is his last contract year. We are probably not playing him again, even if he was available.

I assume that the club is happy to have the delisting at the end of the season and is simply not desperate to use the spot now for the mid season draft.

We do have one pick for Gus spot and maybe that is all they want at this stage. Then again there is no guarantee we will even use that pick.


8 hours ago, Pennant St Dee said:

Doesnโ€™t to me, Rioli matter was the same as were other matters under WADA in other sports.

We are in the predicament with a player down because of one person only and itโ€™s not something I will forget nor will the FD, who I understand started down the road of setting minimum standards before the positive test came to light

ย Chinese swimmers?

21 hours ago, Doug Reemer said:

With Brayshaw retiring is Sam Van Rooyen available for the mid season draft?ย 
ย 

if not, surely thereโ€™s a key forward out there somewhere!! There has to be another James Podsiadly lurking in the state leagues!

Sam is actually no good not sure why this was even posted or mentioned. hes playing in the wafl reserves

2 minutes ago, Tracca said:

Sam is actually no good not sure why this was even posted or mentioned. hes playing in the wafl reserves

Maybe the term โ€œ no goodโ€ could be changed to โ€œ not good enough for AFLโ€.

ย 
2 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Maybe the term โ€œ no goodโ€ could be changed to โ€œ not good enough for AFLโ€.

could be but id say most people get the gist.

Hudson Garoni wouldnt be a bad pickup as a lti player, 23 and has done well so far this season in VFL


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    Itโ€™s Game Day, and 205 days have passed since the final siren sounded at the MCG, bringing Melbourneโ€™s 2025 season to a close and marking the end of an era. In just a few hours, a new chapter begins for the Demons. What are you most hoping to see from Melbourne today?

      • Haha
      • Love
      • Like
    • 113 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 01

    With Opening Round done and dusted, Round 1 sees the full AFL competition finally swing into action for 2026. Discuss all the games this week that do not involve the Dees, share your tips, and let us know which results would suit Demons best.

    • 382 replies
  • PODCAST: 2026 Season Preview

    The boys previewed the 2026 Season sharing their early impressions of the new coach, the new players, observations from preseason training, and what they've made of the new game style. They also look ahead to the season with their predictions, the players they expect to rise, their expectations for the team, and what they see as a realistic pass mark for Melbourne in 2026.

    • 14 replies
  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    When the Demons blew their 46-point lead at Marvel Stadium in Round 20 last year, the fallout was enormous. Like an event straight out of a Shakespearean tragedy, Melbourneโ€™s final-quarter collapse left fans reeling and the club grappling with the aftermath.ย 

    • 10 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    With just over two weeks until their opening match of the 2026 AFL Premiership season, the Demons are already well on the path to redemption and have the Saints firmly in their sights ahead of their mid-March clash at the MCG. What do you think the team will look like when they run out on to the G?

      • Like
    • 654 replies
  • NON-MFC: 2026 Opening Round

    Finally the 2026 AFL Premiership Season is upon us. While Melbourne sits out Opening Round, there is still plenty of footy to enjoy with five non-MFC clashes to kick off the new season. It all begins on Thursday night with a blockbuster at the SCG as Sydney hosts Carlton in what should be a strong early test for both sides. On Friday night, Gold Coast gets its chance to open the season in front of a home crowd when the Suns and Christian Petracca take on Geelong at People First Stadium. Saturday features a double-header, starting in the afternoon with Greater Western Sydney and Clayton Oliver meeting the Hawks at Engie Stadium. That is followed on Saturday night by Brisbane Lions hosting the Western Bulldogs at the Gabba, with the Lions embarking on their campaign to win the Threepeat. Opening Round wraps up on Sunday night at the MCG, where St Kilda takes on Collingwood in the only game in town in the first week of the season. There is no shortage of storylines across the round, so discuss all the action from the non-MFC games of Opening Round.

      • Like
    • 557 replies

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions โ†’ Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.