Jump to content

Featured Replies

We should make him an offer commensurate with his value to us. I don't want to lose him but I think he's worth more to rival clubs where he'll be best 22. He's borderline best 22 for us and is relying on injuries to get regular games.

Personally, I think he should go to another club to fulfil his career. He deserves to I reckon.

 
5 hours ago, Wizard of Koz said:

It only happened once, September 87. Still hurts!

That was a painful PF.

4 hours ago, Hatchman said:

If I was JJ I'd look elsewhere, great player but he's well behind in the pecking order for our midfield. At another club he'd be in the best 22 and playing every week with a lot of certainty

He is not a “great” player, he is a good player and as much as I am a fan, that is the problem. He is behind some great players.

Even if Harmes, Dunstan and Laurie go, who are all behind him, freeing up some cap space, that is probably not the answer as it’s about playing regularly.

 I would move on ANB and Spargo to give him more opportunity, but that won’t happen.

 

 
3 minutes ago, Redleg said:

He is not a “great” player, he is a good player and as much as I am a fan, that is the problem. He is behind some great players.

Even if Harmes, Dunstan and Laurie go, who are all behind him, freeing up some cap space, that is probably not the answer as it’s about playing regularly.

 I would move on ANB and Spargo to give him more opportunity, but that won’t happen.

 

He isn't a half forward so moving those two on would be pointless in this situation.

I think the kid needs to play out the season. Fridge and freezer are a big part of why we will get better short term offensively.

Out elite kids are great contested players but are terrible distributors, Jordan gives us balance in there. I would keep 

1 minute ago, Cheap Seats said:

He isn't a half forward so moving those two on would be pointless in this situation.

I think the kid needs to play out the season. Fridge and freezer are a big part of why we will get better short term offensively.

Out elite kids are great contested players but are terrible distributors, Jordan gives us balance in there. I would keep 

Who are fridge and freezer?


11 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Who are fridge and freezer?

Jordan and sparrow.

It was some in joke from Gus and gawny from 2021 I believe.

Edited by Cheap Seats

Just now, Cheap Seats said:

Jordan and sparrow.

It was some in joke from Gus and gawny from 2021 I believe.

Ok thanks, I hadn’t heard those nick names.

The Good: Better kick than most of our mids, generally composed with good skills, good role player, versatile, team first.

The bad: A bit plodding

The ugly: N/A

It's a shame the club hasn't seen fit to play him more. I'd have him ahead of Harmes, Dunstan and Laurie. I like Laurie's smarts and skills but just not sure he'll cut it at the next level.

 
1 hour ago, BDA said:

We should make him an offer commensurate with his value to us. I don't want to lose him but I think he's worth more to rival clubs where he'll be best 22. He's borderline best 22 for us and is relying on injuries to get regular games.

Personally, I think he should go to another club to fulfil his career. He deserves to I reckon.

He has a contract from the club ready for him to sign.

He has put off a decision.

All the noise indicates he is going albeit reluctantly.

6 hours ago, Gorgoroth said:

If we breached it, but May went into the game injured. Take him off toward the end. No one would have been able to prove anything different. We have scans of his torn hammy. We were protecting the fact he may have torn it off the bone in essentially by that stage a dead game.

May has already said he did not want to come off and wanted to be on the ground for the final season. 


8 minutes ago, Demons11 said:

May has already said he did not want to come off and wanted to be on the ground for the final season. 

And so he should have. He’s waited a long time to win a flag, and was a massive reason why we won it.
JJ is still very young and has his entire career ahead of him.
The sub rule was a joke and it’s very unfortunate that JJ was the one who had to do it.
But, ask Hunt and I’m sure he would have liked to have been the sub. Same with Smith, Melksham and countless others who missed out altogether. 

Edited by Jaded No More

5 hours ago, Redleg said:

I would move on ANB and Spargo to give him more opportunity, but that won’t happen.

You obviously aspire to our glory days of the '70s.

Why should we put games into a player who has signalled very early on to look elsewhere.  Jordon is a solid player without any elite skill set.  I hope he stays but if not I wish him all the best.

I too hope he stays, I think there's a narrow window where he chooses to stay with us - plays the season out including the GF on field, and Harmes and Laurie both get traded.  Unlikely but possible.

5 hours ago, Redleg said:

He is not a “great” player, he is a good player and as much as I am a fan, that is the problem. He is behind some great players.

Even if Harmes, Dunstan and Laurie go, who are all behind him, freeing up some cap space, that is probably not the answer as it’s about playing regularly.

 I would move on ANB and Spargo to give him more opportunity, but that won’t happen.

 

You're right. Spargo & ANB won't go because they're contracted respectively to 2025 & 2026 😀

4 hours ago, Roger Mellie said:

The Good: Better kick than most of our mids, generally composed with good skills, good role player, versatile, team first.

The bad: A bit plodding

The ugly: N/A

It's a shame the club hasn't seen fit to play him more. I'd have him ahead of Harmes, Dunstan and Laurie. I like Laurie's smarts and skills but just not sure he'll cut it at the next level.

He is ahead of Harmes, Dunstan & Laurie. When Oliver comes back though it's between JJ & Woewodin who stays in the 22. And will Chandler come back into the side at some stage? How are we going to squeeze Hibberd back in?

4 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

He has a contract from the club ready for him to sign.

He has put off a decision.

All the noise indicates he is going albeit reluctantly.

He was right to park contract discussions. Of couse he needs to know whether he's in our preferred 22 before he signs. How long's the contract? How lucrative is it compared to what he could get elsewhere? 

19 minutes ago, Jontee said:

You obviously aspire to our glory days of the '70s.

Why should we put games into a player who has signalled very early on to look elsewhere.  Jordon is a solid player without any elite skill set.  I hope he stays but if not I wish him all the best.

Signalled very early? Why, because he parked contract discussions. It was the right thing for him to do given the circumstances then and now. We pick our best side, regardless of whether the player is contracted for next year or not.


29 minutes ago, Jontee said:

You obviously aspire to our glory days of the '70s.

Why should we put games into a player who has signalled very early on to look elsewhere.  Jordon is a solid player without any elite skill set.  I hope he stays but if not I wish him all the best.

No I don’t.

You obviously think ANB and Spargo are better players than JJ. I wonder how many agree with you.

19 minutes ago, Sydney_Demon said:

You're right. Spargo & ANB won't go because they're contracted respectively to 2025 & 2026 😀

Contracted players can be traded.

23 hours ago, praha said:

Spargo isn't overrated. In fact he's barely recognised. He's not played as a deep forward and suspect Goodwin plays him in a very specific role. There must be something about him and what he does that just isn't seen to the natural eye. He's quote strong in the core and rarely turns the ball over by foot and hand. Of all the "experienced" players his clanger rate is the lowest over his career.

Spargo dropped for the 3rd time this year. Obviously no longer overrated by the Match Committee, but still overrated on Demonland.

23 hours ago, Gorgoroth said:

No idea. As others have said, May went in with a torn hammy, take him off the last 10 mins and if the AFL complain attach the scans to the front of an old Panzerkampfwagen Tiger Ausf.B and drive them down their throats whilst hanging out of the turret with the cup!

I get it, but I seriously doubt that anyone would have cared, but Harmes was willing to say he had hammy “awareness” or as I state above. Take May off.

Post of the year for the Panzerwagen reference. Very good timing with the tour on and Wout van Aert playing the modern day Tony Panzerwagen Martin 

Edited by Superunknown

1 hour ago, mo64 said:

Spargo dropped for the 3rd time this year. Obviously no longer overrated by the Match Committee, but still overrated on Demonland.

Has really struggled since his concussion ...


11 minutes ago, old55 said:

Has really struggled since his concussion ...

Prior to being concussed, he had 1 possession in a half of football against the Bombers. He got dropped once he was available for selection. 

23 hours ago, Tracca said:

we would of had to fork out 50k if we breached the sub rule

My MFCSS nightmare envisaged Gillon coming out after the final siren and exhibiting Rule 199.7.3(c)(iii)  that had only just been discovered stating that a team (other than Geelong, Collingwood, Essendon, Carlton, Richmond or any franchise club) who fakes a sub forfeits the game - and goes on to present the cup to Footscray. 😱🤮

8 hours ago, Sydney_Demon said:

He is ahead of Harmes, Dunstan & Laurie. When Oliver comes back though it's between JJ & Woewodin who stays in the 22. And will Chandler come back into the side at some stage? How are we going to squeeze Hibberd back in?

He was right to park contract discussions. Of couse he needs to know whether he's in our preferred 22 before he signs. How long's the contract? How lucrative is it compared to what he could get elsewhere? 

Signalled very early? Why, because he parked contract discussions. It was the right thing for him to do given the circumstances then and now. We pick our best side, regardless of whether the player is contracted for next year or not.

Yes, it will be difficult for JJ when Ollie returns.  Woewoden could be the unlucky one.   Cannot see any of the other mids being left out.

Re Hibberd - can anyone else envisage Bowey being moved forward. to take Spargo's place?   Great defensive skills and pressure, and a good kick at goal.  Could be an ideal 'defensive forward'.

 

Edited by monoccular

55 minutes ago, mo64 said:

Prior to being concussed, he had 1 possession in a half of football against the Bombers. He got dropped once he was available for selection. 

Yes he wasn't Robinson Crusoe against Essendon.

 
8 hours ago, Sydney_Demon said:

He was right to park contract discussions. Of couse he needs to know whether he's in our preferred 22 before he signs. How long's the contract? How lucrative is it compared to what he could get elsewhere? 

 

i heard he was asking for 4yrs, you'd assume thats 4yrs at 300k which is average and then bonuses and clauses related to games played and bnf taking him further from there which is perfectly reasonable for him, think similar to marlion pickett/kamdyn mcintosh at richmond but hes getting security on career. other clubs probably offer him 400 + bonuses, id be reluctant as him to assume im going into anyones best 22 with any sort of permanency. the interested clubs

essendon: zerrett, parish, hobbs, perkins, setterfield, tsatas so he's ahead of shiel MAYBE setterfield with another top 10 pick this season and in future years

gcs: Rowell, anderson, touk and then top picks davies, hollands, flanders + swallow and then academy players and top picks to come hes outside the starting square there too

and swans: gulden, rowbum, parker, mills, chad so he's at least 6th there too without pinch hitters or pick 4 this year. 

if i'm him id trust the process where i am and maybe look around again in another 2-3 years if its still 12-15 games a season or less

On 7/19/2023 at 4:22 PM, Turner said:

Finn Macrae of collingwood or elijah hollands would be younger alternatives too. Beast mode mathieson as an older body too who's great for culture around the club. 

Or a reid type ;)

 

I cant say I agree with you on in regards to that tird.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
    • 48 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies