Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, Jaded No More said:

Top 2 is a better goal. Let’s not be cocky and think that playing Port in Adelaide or Pies in week one is going to be a better result than a home final in week one ffs!

Not cocky, don’t think we are finishing top 2. We almost beat Port playing one decent quarter over there. Don’t want to play Pies here first week of finals.

Edited by Dee Zephyr

 
1 minute ago, Jaded No More said:

Honestly anyone who wanted Essendon to lose doesn’t understand how this season could play out. Very poor result for us. 

I hear you, but where I’m at is that if we finish top 4 (as we’ll need to to have a genuine chance), then from there, if we’re good enough we’ll win.

We can win this year, no question, but I’m not seeing the team unity we had in 2021, and that Collingwood and Port have. 

long way to go though…

2 minutes ago, Winners at last said:

Hey peanut ...

Demons were never going to finish top 2, so it's better that the teams pushing for 4th place lose. 

Come back to me when you've thought about it ... hahaha 

I agree with you Winners. This talk that we're a lock for top 4 is very premature.

 
1 minute ago, Jaded No More said:

Hey Einstein, we could absolutely finish top 2 with our percentage gap. Port winning today makes it much less likely. 
If a side like Essendon get out spot in the top 4, we can’t win the flag anyway, so what does it matter?

All will be revealed in the fullness of time.


Just now, DutchDemons said:

If you can’t take joy in watching the peptides lose like that, I feel sorry for you. 

I take joy in 3 things and 3 things only 

1- Melbourne winning 

2- Geelong losing 

3- Death riding Freo

Port are very ho hum away from the MCG. Would love to get them there in a final.

Butters is playing a complete outside game. 25 disposals for 4 contested possessions and 8 score involvements.

If someone sits on him that's a huge part of their game nullified.

And still, Essendon should have won.

Just now, A F said:

Port are very ho hum away from the MCG. Would love to get them there in a final.

Butters is playing a complete outside game. 25 disposals for 4 contested possessions and 8 score involvements.

If someone sits on him that's a huge part of their game nullified.

And still, Essendon should have won.

Next time we play Port, if we do, I hope Harmes sits on Butters. 

 

Pity our chances of finishing 2nd have almost been snuffed out but that's on us. That said, if we had to miss out on a home Qualifying final then Essendon losing after the siren is how I'd want it to happen. 

i reckon we could lose the name calling in the thread

some people happy the bombers lost like me coz i despise them and other not happy as our chances of top 2 are less


Just now, Jaded No More said:

Next time we play Port, if we do, I hope Harmes sits on Butters. 

So do I. That's why being able to fit Harmes in the midfield over JJ, gives us good options. Leaving Clarry, Trac and Viney to play their game.

We lost the chance of top 2 after the last qtr capitulation last week.

If we're good enough, as Richmond were, we'll win it from fourth with a leg in the air.

I'm sorry but Essendon losing after the siren makes my night. 

Our ladder position is up to the players and Goodwin and us winning. We can't rely on other teams. 

It's a shame Essendon are still in the 8


1 minute ago, Return to Glory said:

I agree with you Winners. This talk that we're a lock for top 4 is very premature.

We’re not playing good footy consistently enough and the gap between our best and worst is gigantic. We are very flaky atm and are currently a fair way off the top 3 performance wise.

Dont worry about top 2, Id be happy finishing the regular season top 4. From there anything goes.

10 minutes ago, Chook said:

Eff me dead what a kick to win the match!

An illegal one. He moves 2 meters off the mark to the left before even starting the run.

6 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

I take joy in 3 things and 3 things only 

1- Melbourne winning 

2- Geelong losing 

3- Death riding Freo

An Essenscum loss after the siren surely comes [censored] close

No one in the league and for good reasons have decided to sit on Butters.

Port are in for a rude shock when finals come along and someone decides to sit on him with a firm tag.

 

Edited by YesitwasaWin4theAges


4 minutes ago, Megatron said:

We lost the chance of top 2 after the last qtr capitulation last week.

Or the last quarter capitulation against Port.

Just now, Demon Disciple said:

We are very flaky atm and are currently a fair way off the top 3 performance wise.

Yeah Brisbane have been amazing. I loved their loss to Hawthorn a couple of weeks back.

 

Lots of people easily seduced by a walk in the park win over a soft as butter flakey as a flake chocolate Gold Coast side.

Edited by YesitwasaWin4theAges

Dunno, that loss to a [censored] Freo side at home certainly cost us more than Port beating Essendon….


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Haha
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 198 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Sad
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Like
    • 31 replies