Jump to content

Featured Replies

This is Melkshams level.. at VFL. Great for the kids coming through and an extra experience body to help out but that's it.

His time at AFL level is limited, let's keep it that way.

 
1 hour ago, titan_uranus said:

I saw a clip of Melksham’s goal where he kicked it up to himself. McDonald looked like he could barely walk, let alone run. 

Has he improved since then or is he injured?

Thanks 'titan', was just reading through and going to post this.

He just can't run anymore, never been agile but could cover distance...now he's just jogging around.

I don't think he's come back well from the foot injury.

9 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

This is Melkshams level.. at VFL. Great for the kids coming through and an extra experience body to help out but that's it.

His time at AFL level is limited, let's keep it that way.

Perhaps, but might be worth trying to get him to 100 games. He has kids and you never know.

 
10 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

This is Melkshams level.. at VFL. Great for the kids coming through and an extra experience body to help out but that's it.

His time at AFL level is limited, let's keep it that way.

It will include 2 more games as sub.


This thread tl;dr :

"Goodwin needs to reward players that are playing well ..... Wait, no! Don't reward him! He only plays well at VFL level!"

 

Edited by Axis of Bob

8 minutes ago, rjay said:

Thanks 'titan', was just reading through and going to post this.

He just can't run anymore, never been agile but could cover distance...now he's just jogging around.

I don't think he's come back well from the foot injury.

Tom got some ball around the ground, but BBB and he were poor as key forwards again.

BBB appears very slow and lumbering.

Edited by Redleg

Haven't watched the game yet. What happened to Dunstan only 11 disposals?

 
19 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

Haven't watched the game yet. What happened to Dunstan only 11 disposals?

Went off with a leg injury. Maybe the calf, early in the third, I think. 

35 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Tom got some ball around the ground, but BBB and he were poor as key forwards again.

BBB appears very slow and lumbering.

Both are now...Tommy picked up a couple through experience but never looked out of a jog.


39 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Tom got some ball around the ground, but BBB and he were poor as key forwards again.

BBB appears very slow and lumbering.

What happened to BBB? he looked a Coleman contestant during the first two rounds of the season.... It is all but gone now.

44 minutes ago, Axis of Bob said:

This thread tl;dr :

"Goodwin needs to reward players we are playing well ..... Wait, no! Don't reward him! He only plays well at VFL level!"

 

To be fair I wouldn’t say that Melksham hasn’t been rewarded both for good and ordinary form. 

I wasn’t able to watch today. How did Durssma go today? He could be within range with Freeo’s pick.

1 hour ago, bing181 said:

Perhaps, but might be worth trying to get him to 100 games. He has kids and you never know.

If his form warrants him being selected then fine, but if there's a genuine choice between Melksham and a first or second year player then the priority should be to the younger player. Forget the father-son situation.

1 hour ago, leave it to deever said:

Can Tomlinson play forward?

I appreciate recent AFL form show's he probably doesn't have a place in the Melbourne backline but why would we be considering him up forward? At least as a backman he can contribute at Casey.

1 hour ago, WERRIDEE said:

Haven't watched the game yet. What happened to Dunstan only 11 disposals?

Went off injured.

23 minutes ago, Demonsterative said:

I wasn’t able to watch today. How did Durssma go today? He could be within range with Freeo’s pick.

Only 9 possessions today but you can see he has talent. 

IMO another key forward has been and still is, our biggest priority.

Jefferson is a fair way off, Petty doesn’t seem to be a goal scoring key forward, Schache is provably a temporary fill in, Max for some reason can’t adjust his kicking for goal to the obvious kick, of aiming for the right side points, BBB and Tom appear unless a big change occurs, to be near the end and JVR is a young kid, who can’t do it on his own.

Chandler appears to have solved the needed extra small forward role.

 


50 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

To be fair I wouldn’t say that Melksham hasn’t been rewarded both for good and ordinary form. 

Melk deserves another sub game on the back of today, probably ahead of Harmes.

Lovely day in Wonthaggi - not such a common event. Casey welcomed back skipper Mitch White, Harmes (after subbing last night), Melksham, Woewodin(?). Draft hopeful Zane Duursma also. Moniz-Wakefield and Jimmy Munro (still) missing. Scrappy first qtr with Casey having the better of the play, but not converting. Casey pretty much maintained the ascendancy after that. Some casual AFL listed observations/opinions… Melksham most creative and effective fwd, could have finished with 6 or 7 with a bit of straighter shooting - too good for this level. Joel Smith up forward looked lively at times as well as his 3 goal burst in the second - only fwd that came clean in the air at the ball. Still not convinced though. Tmac got a bit of it mostly pushing up the ground, but his ground game and short passing were underwhelming, as was BBBrown, who struggling to have any impact. Wouldn’t think either are looking at senior duties any time soon. Farris-White swapped with Bell in the ruck and was monstered by Meek, but kept at it and had a couple of wins late in the game. Tall lad - looked to be same height as Gawny, who was in attendance along with Lever and Chandler (and Chocco) that I could see. Think Tim English in early days - light build atm. Thought Turner was our most solid defender in the air and on the ground - the defender I would elevate if we needed one. Looks same height as Tomlinson, who had an Ok game but his ground game made me nervous. Deakin Smith played one of his best games that I have seen. - composed, intercepting, attacking. Woewodin moved well, impacts the game - did have a fair of bench time. Howes not prominent but did what he needed to do. Harmes bullocked his way through the game in his usual attacking, crash-through style - with the usual odd caught in possession. Bill Laurie did some nice things but wasn’t prominent. Jed Adams looked the most composed I have seen him - getting the hang of the level, moves well and raking kick. Jefferson was rarely involved, went behind the ball at times, but showed signs of smarts when he did, and kicked a nice set shot - but a long way off. Dunstan went off with a knee mid-game, was hard at it but not his dominant self from the previous week. Sestan bobbed up here and there, snapped a nice goal, looks to be defending better. Zane Duursma looks tallish and a bit lightly built - bit like Howes - moved well but didn’t impact much with his minimum ground time. The Casey lads had their usual hard crack - George Grey probably the best of them. White and Buntine showed poise under pressure. Other highlights were TMac kicking the ball into the camera scissor lift cage above behind the goals, and the footy going over the clubroom roof, and another on the table tennis club roof and getting stuck behind a roof sign. Overall and enjoyable day and a good result.

Edited by Robbie87

2 hours ago, bing181 said:

Perhaps, but might be worth trying to get him to 100 games. He has kids and you never know.

Agree - two games off 100 with Dees…we should give him those two at least, been a Good Samaritan who deserves at least that.

33 minutes ago, Redleg said:

IMO another key forward has been and still is, our biggest priority.

Jefferson is a fair way off, Petty doesn’t seem to be a goal scoring key forward, Schache is provably a temporary fill in, Max for some reason can’t adjust his kicking for goal to the obvious kick, of aiming for the right side points, BBB and Tom appear unless a big change occurs, to be near the end and JVR is a young kid, who can’t do it on his own.

Chandler appears to have solved the needed extra small forward role.

 

Tend to agree - but very hard to find .should pick best around in next years draft . Ut also try to develop Jefferson whom shows good promise. We also need a good mid to cover Oliver, Petracca and co.


McDonald struggling to push forward is probably not the sigh of someone that's going to break into the senior side anytime soon.

6 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

McDonald struggling to push forward is probably not the sigh of someone that's going to break into the senior side anytime soon.

I think he'd just copped a knock, but that's truly some old man stuff and nothing like McDonald in full flight that made him so dangerous at his peak.

9 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

McDonald struggling to push forward is probably not the sigh of someone that's going to break into the senior side anytime soon.

He looks bloody sore, is it his foot again?

 

What do people think about Woewodin? Out of contract at the end of the season. Seems a fair way back in terms of selection. Will he make it? Will he play any senior games this season? Will we offer him an extension?

I suspect he won't play this season, but we will offer him a one-year extension. He appears to have improved a lot, and he's much better than when we drafted him - which was a speculative pick anyway and no other club was going to draft him. Unfortunately for him, no spots have opened up.

Liked what Ive seen at Casey and in pre season.... DEFINATE keeper


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Vomit
      • Like
    • 134 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Haha
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 406 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Sad
    • 47 replies