Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

At least West Coast fought hard and were tackling and working to move the footy right to the end. Hawthorn just stopped playing. Sam Mitchell has NFI. 

 

In other news, no Nenkurvis for Richmond either in two weeks time. 

There were literally moments of walking from Hawthorn. I'd be more entertained at a Coffee Club walkathon.

 
 
3 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Highest scoring quarter of any team so far this year. And it hadda be Jeremy Cameron Geelong. 😑

And how is Cameron's dicky hamstring going?  Will it last a full year?  When / if it twangs bye bye Geelong.

3 hours ago, gs77 said:

Where's Hawthorn's $500k fine, Gil?

Another one for his future job at Toastermasters

Edited by layzie
*Toastmasters. They aren't toasters


9 hours ago, Winners at last said:

Taylor constantly suggesting that the Hawks have some chance. The game was over 10 minutes ago. What a moron.

He is just following he script from Channel 7's narrative to pump the game up right until the bleeding obvious. Remember Coll v Bris. The Pies 40 odd points down with 40 seconds left and he asks Daisy do they still have a chance. MORON.

Mackay got graded medium impact for that, and gets a week?

what is happening to our game?

soft as

2 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Mackay got graded medium impact for that, and gets a week?

what is happening to our game?

soft as

Well tbh when I saw it, I thought a week. A giant runs in and uses his forearm to strike a smaller player on the side of the face, after he has got rid of the ball. Could have been a broken cheekbone, or even a concussion, when he didn’t need to touch him. Could have pushed him, or grabbed him, or actually not touched him. No need for an unexpected forearm to the face/head.

Thats not footy.

 
1 minute ago, Redleg said:

Well tbh when I saw it, I thought a week. A giant runs in and uses his forearm to strike a smaller player on the side of the face, after he has got rid of the ball. Could have been a broken cheekbone, or even a concussion, when he didn’t need to touch him. Could have pushed him, or grabbed him, or actually not touched him. No need for an unexpected forearm to the face/head.

Thats not footy.

Agreed. Totally unnecessary and potentially very harmful. A week is perhaps even a little light, given what else we have seen this season so far.

5 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Well tbh when I saw it, I thought a week. A giant runs in and uses his forearm to strike a smaller player on the side of the face, after he has got rid of the ball. Could have been a broken cheekbone, or even a concussion, when he didn’t need to touch him. Could have pushed him, or grabbed him, or actually not touched him. No need for an unexpected forearm to the face/head.

Thats not footy.

agree no need for it. 

but the impact was low and not worthy of a week imo. 


1 minute ago, DubDee said:

agree no need for it. 

but the impact was low and not worthy of a week imo. 

But Kossie got 2 for the potential to cause injury. Same approach I suppose 

27 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Mackay got graded medium impact for that, and gets a week?

what is happening to our game?

soft as

Never had his eyes on the ball. Plenty of time to size up the situation. Chose to hit high with both forearms.

1-week seems more than reasonable.

8 minutes ago, TRIGON said:

Never had his eyes on the ball. Plenty of time to size up the situation. Chose to hit high with both forearms.
 

agree with all that

what do you think about impact though?  if low it’s not a week

On 4/9/2023 at 8:59 AM, Return to Glory said:

Amidst all the excitement of last night, Stewie Dew quietly stinks it up again. You've got to admire how he goes about it. The supporter must surely be frustrated by now.

Wasn't sure if the singular supporter was intentional, but gees it cracked me up.

19 hours ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

This Hawthorn team is worse than any Melbourne team under Neeld or Bailey. They have zero stars. The blokes they brought it, like Frost, Impey and Wingard are all C graders. They may have some young talent, but in my opinion they are headed the same route as the Dees circa 2009-2014. They are really really bad. Funny to hear Hodge still backing his mate Mitchell, but I reckon he will be gone in two years. 

Maybe Clarko will have had enough at North Melbourne by then and they'll ask him to come back.


If you were coaching Geelong who would you clear for some nice early draft picks to Hawthorn, seeing as they probably discussed that after the game, because there wouldn't have been much else to talk about.

15 minutes ago, DubDee said:

agree with all that

what do you think about impact though?  if low it’s not a week

depends whether they upgrade it for potential harm

that puts us into the realm of afl mysticism and lets face it the afl want the brownbaggers in the finals

1 hour ago, daisycutter said:

depends whether they upgrade it for potential harm

that puts us into the realm of afl mysticism and lets face it the afl want the brownbaggers in the finals

true.

the mro always takes the lease controversial decision and leaves it to the appeals or tribunal to be hated. 

it’s set up for him to get off imo

1 hour ago, DubDee said:

agree with all that

what do you think about impact though?  if low it’s not a week

Fair question. Given his size and momentum I'd rate it as medium.

1 hour ago, In Harmes Way said:

Wasn't sure if the singular supporter was intentional, but gees it cracked me up.

I'm always chasing an easy gag. So yes


On 4/9/2023 at 8:59 AM, Return to Glory said:

Amidst all the excitement of last night, Stewie Dew quietly stinks it up again. You've got to admire how he goes about it. The supporter must surely be frustrated by now.

Ah Stewie.

"Let's send 5th gamer Mac Andrew to an in form Jack Higgins. This can't fail!" 

Edited by layzie

2 hours ago, DubDee said:

agree with all that

what do you think about impact though?  if low it’s not a week

Personally I would agree with that, but under the current rules “potential to cause injury “lifts the grading and that is it. 

30 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Personally I would agree with that, but under the current rules “potential to cause injury “lifts the grading and that is it. 

fair enough 

the way i see the potential rule (trying to apply logic) is there must be sufficient speed or impact involved that there is potential for a worse outcome. like the kozzi incident. i don’t see that in the mackay incident 

 
47 minutes ago, layzie said:

Ah Stewie.

"Let's send 5th gamer Mac Andrew to an in form Jack Higgins. This can't fail!" 

Yeah. Interesting to compare approaches. Van Roo had to develop at Casey for 12 months before debuting. Mac is being asked to play as a lockdown defender on the opposition's most dangerous small in his fifth game!

How on earth does McKay get off on that late hit. It is ridiculous, farcical and completely inconsistent with what we have seen in the past.

But are we surprised…. not  one bit. Protected club. 

Edited by Gawndy the Great


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies