Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, Demonland said:

I saw advertising where St. Kilda were offering 2 for 1 Memberships. I hope that only counts as 1.

Yes they were hammering that on SEN last Wednesday or Thursday, I wondered if it would only count as 1 but more than likely will count as 2.

 
On 2/19/2022 at 9:38 AM, Its Time for Back to Back said:

This membership table comes from the HS on 19 Feb. West Coast had the most members last year and are probably on top at this point. We are having our best year ever and are 9th. A bit of a reality check about the relative strengths of the Clubs and where we sit. 

Richmond 84,948
Collingwood 70,000
Carlton 67,928
Essendon 60,678 
Hawthorn 60,100
Port Adelaide 52,164
Geelong 49,055
St Kilda 43,500
Melbourne 43,000
Adelaide 40,000 +
Fremantle 40,000
Western Bulldogs 38,824
North Melbourne 38,756
Sydney Swans 35,722
Brisbane Lions 29,318
GWS Giants 25,094
Gold Coast 8,721
 

Makes me puke seeing the Carlton and Essendon membership numbers where they are given how crap they've been for years.

20 minutes ago, gs77 said:

Makes me puke seeing the Carlton and Essendon membership numbers where they are given how crap they've been for years.

Only goes to show how delusional these people are.

 
26 minutes ago, gs77 said:

Makes me puke seeing the Carlton and Essendon membership numbers where they are given how crap they've been for years.

Still not as putrid as us cobba.

8 hours ago, gs77 said:

Makes me puke seeing the Carlton and Essendon membership numbers where they are given how crap they've been for years.

I think there will be a huge serge in wthe first couple of rounds as we celebrate the premiership., I’m still predicting 65-70k which will put us well within the top six. If we go back to back 2023 will be well in excess of 100,000.


3 hours ago, Dees2014 said:

I think there will be a huge serge in wthe first couple of rounds as we celebrate the premiership., I’m still predicting 65-70k which will put us well within the top six. If we go back to back 2023 will be well in excess of 100,000.

‘Well in excess of 100k’…

You are just setting yourself up for disappointment.

We need to be in the top 4-6 teams for 6+ years with at least 2 flags and then we can talk about having market share like that.

22 hours ago, gs77 said:

Makes me puke seeing the Carlton and Essendon membership numbers where they are given how crap they've been for years.

They are a long way off our 50 years of crap.

Ok so I want to sign up, I was a redlegs member back in the darkest days from 2008-2013, but those are all sold out now and the trident too (which is around the price range). Forgive me if I'm wrong but if I'm a member I only want to sit amongst my fellow kin and be undercover.

Of the 40k or so we have currently what is the breakdown of memberships? in terms of Redlegs, Trident and so on...

 
2 hours ago, DemonSam said:

Ok so I want to sign up, I was a redlegs member back in the darkest days from 2008-2013, but those are all sold out now and the trident too (which is around the price range). Forgive me if I'm wrong but if I'm a member I only want to sit amongst my fellow kin and be undercover.

Of the 40k or so we have currently what is the breakdown of memberships? in terms of Redlegs, Trident and so on...

So are you saying you won’t buy a membership if you aren’t assured an undercover seat?

And you were a member in 2013?

So possibly getting wet < 2012 Neeld era Dees?

 

Maths is wild.

3 hours ago, DemonSam said:

Ok so I want to sign up, I was a redlegs member back in the darkest days from 2008-2013, but those are all sold out now and the trident too (which is around the price range). Forgive me if I'm wrong but if I'm a member I only want to sit amongst my fellow kin and be undercover.

Of the 40k or so we have currently what is the breakdown of memberships? in terms of Redlegs, Trident and so on...

There’s a roof going over the ‘G so you’re all good with the undercover part. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay


10 hours ago, DemonSam said:

Ok so I want to sign up, I was a redlegs member back in the darkest days from 2008-2013, but those are all sold out now and the trident too (which is around the price range). Forgive me if I'm wrong but if I'm a member I only want to sit amongst my fellow kin and be undercover.

Of the 40k or so we have currently what is the breakdown of memberships? in terms of Redlegs, Trident and so on...

They should have reserved seat packages for undercover seats on level 1 can't remember what it's called though.

talk to membership on the phone.

i'm sure they can easily find you a reserved seat under cover

11 hours ago, DemonSam said:

Ok so I want to sign up, I was a redlegs member back in the darkest days from 2008-2013, but those are all sold out now and the trident too (which is around the price range). Forgive me if I'm wrong but if I'm a member I only want to sit amongst my fellow kin and be undercover.

Of the 40k or so we have currently what is the breakdown of memberships? in terms of Redlegs, Trident and so on...

There used to be a membership category called "demon seats - undercover" that was on level 1 on the wing. Had GF guarantee too if I remember correctly ...

On 2/20/2022 at 6:53 PM, gs77 said:

Makes me puke seeing the Carlton and Essendon membership numbers where they are given how crap they've been for years.

I predict we will be at 65-70 thousand by mid year particularly if we start well and the girls take out the flag. We traditionally sign up a lot of our members in the first 3 or 4 weeks of the year, and so it will be this year.

4 hours ago, Dees2014 said:

I predict we will be at 65-70 thousand by mid year particularly if we start well and the girls take out the flag. We traditionally sign up a lot of our members in the first 3 or 4 weeks of the year, and so it will be this year.

I can only assume you're a youngster... 

We reached approx 53,000 members after our grand final win. Some of those members were WA people who support other clubs but purchased a membership to gain GF entry. 

Where do you believe another 15-20k members are going to appear from by the middle of the year? 

The only possible way that could possibly happen is if the MFC/MCC dual membership came down to some ridiculous price. 

I don't understand where you think that amount of new members will come from if not from the MCC? 

 


10 minutes ago, JimmyGadson said:

I can only assume you're a youngster... 

We reached approx 53,000 members after our grand final win. Some of those members were WA people who support other clubs but purchased a membership to gain GF entry. 

Where do you believe another 15-20k members are going to appear from by the middle of the year? 

The only possible way that could possibly happen is if the MFC/MCC dual membership came down to some ridiculous price. 

I don't understand where you think that amount of new members will come from if not from the MCC? 

 

Weve had more than that many unique members over the last 5-10 years. 

10 minutes ago, JimmyGadson said:

I can only assume you're a youngster... 

We reached approx 53,000 members after our grand final win. Some of those members were WA people who support other clubs but purchased a membership to gain GF entry. 

Where do you believe another 15-20k members are going to appear from by the middle of the year? 

The only possible way that could possibly happen is if the MFC/MCC dual membership came down to some ridiculous price. 

I don't understand where you think that amount of new members will come from if not from the MCC? 

 

We were on track for $60k before Covid hit again.

I don't think 65k is out of the realms of possibility after a flag, but I think it will end up somewhere between 60k and 65k.

On 2/21/2022 at 6:25 AM, rpfc said:

‘Well in excess of 100k’…

You are just setting yourself up for disappointment.

We need to be in the top 4-6 teams for 6+ years with at least 2 flags and then we can talk about having market share like that.

I reckon if we build a new entertainment,training, community centre in Fishermans Bend/ Port Melbourne with its anticipated 800,00 new residents we could easily look at that membership.

41 minutes ago, dpositive said:

I reckon if we build a new entertainment,training, community centre in Fishermans Bend/ Port Melbourne with its anticipated 800,00 new residents we could easily look at that membership.

800,000 lol

48 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

800,000 lol

Fair enough DC but I'm pretty sure that's the figure governments of bot persuasions have stated over the many years that this project was promoted.


17 minutes ago, dpositive said:

Fair enough DC but I'm pretty sure that's the figure governments of bot persuasions have stated over the many years that this project was promoted.

they are quoting 80,000 by 2052 not 800,000......still in their dreams, but

6 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

they are quoting 80,000 by 2052 not 800,000......still in their dreams, but

Thanks DC 

But can still build our membership if we have a presence there

Just now, dpositive said:

Thanks DC 

But can still build our membership if we have a presence there

think you're flogging a dead horse here dp. the board has decided the new home is to be in the mcg precinct

 
2 hours ago, daisycutter said:

think you're flogging a dead horse here dp. the board has decided the new home is to be in the mcg precinct

Correct DC. Why people keep thinking fisherman's bend is beyond me. The board says G precinct. Everything else will not happen. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies