Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
12 minutes ago, Satan said:

Hawkins in strife?

Absolutely, dangerous tackle, concussed. Must get at least a week

1 minute ago, bobby1554 said:

Absolutely, dangerous tackle, concussed. Must get at least a week

But won’t because Geelong 

 
11 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Bloke subbed off. Should be a week but probably won’t 

Has to be a minimum of two weeks. Tackled the player ..drove his head into the ground ..free kick paid ..Saints player straight off with concussion. Pretty good Hawkins with shabby actions..Stephen May says hello 😏


  • Author

Saints and Blues are off for mad Monday 

seasons done

2 minutes ago, bobby1554 said:

Absolutely, dangerous tackle, concussed. Must get at least a week

Popped onto the match page on the AFL app. Oddly I didn't see any mention of this incident. If it was ANB they'd already be building the gallows.

Heroic stuff by Hawkins. Did his best to prevent the Saints player from self concussing himself. 

 

So will scott at the press conference say he didnt see hawkins tackle?

So. Assuming we win tomorrow (I know, I know), if we lose next week and Port beat Doggies, we’re off to Adelaide. Fate in our hands and all that. Unless Dogs beat Port, which they will….maybe…..not….probably….aaaaah, who the [censored] knows. 🤯


3 minutes ago, gs77 said:

Port making Teague's tenure rather tenuous. 

I don’t recall that there are degrees of tenuousness.  

1 minute ago, gs77 said:

Popped onto the match page on the AFL app. Oddly I didn't see any mention of this incident. If it was ANB they'd already be building the gallows.

Most importantly, did ch 7 make a judgement?  
If not Christian won’t even look at it. 

Under the matrix it’s reckless and high impact ( concussion) which is 1-2 weeks.

interested to see how Christiansen spins this. Probably medium with a fine. In fact I’m 100% sure this is what will happen. 

Was watching the port/carl game earlier and I cannot believe how a side can switch off like Carlton. About 1/2 way through second quarter and they threw their hands up in the air. Later watched the last quartwe of saints and geelong and i came to realise how much I hate geelong. They are up their wit the filth.

96 point loss for Marc Murphy in his final game.

Poor guy. He's been a warrior for the Blues in the same way Jones has been for us. 

Edited by Demon Jack


1 minute ago, monoccular said:
5 minutes ago, gs77 said:

 

Most importantly, did ch 7 make a judgement?  
If not Christian won’t even look at it. 

They left it at “momentum”. Which is bulltish if you look at the side view. Hawkins very obviously flung him down in the last movement, based on the side view. But you’re right, won’t be looked at. 

27 minutes ago, Jaded said:

Can’t see Geelong losing 3 in a row so perhaps not a bad thing if they win. 

They won't be too desperate to beat us now. If they had of been playing for a top 4 finish then they would have been harder.

Now just an even type of game.

Both wanting to go into the finals with momentum. 

Jeelong 3 Home Games in a Row

Just checking 

What an Armchair ride they get down at Taxpayers Stadium 🏟 

 

is it possible we could play Cats 3 times?

2 minutes ago, Wadda We Sing said:

is it possible we could play Cats 3 times?

No it would only be twice

Preliminary Final swap sides

could be 3 out of 4!!!


10 minutes ago, CYB said:

Under the matrix it’s reckless and high impact ( concussion) which is 1-2 weeks.

interested to see how Christiansen spins this. Probably medium with a fine. In fact I’m 100% sure this is what will happen. 

Hasn’t been told yet whether to look at it or not. 

Fast start at the Gabba with 3 goals within 2 minutes of game time.

11 minutes ago, monoccular said:

I don’t recall that there are degrees of tenuousness.  

Most importantly, did ch 7 make a judgement?  
If not Christian won’t even look at it. 

The mrp is a joke but i would think Christian looks at at least all incidents involving concussion and especially being subbed off. A week probably coming up for tom.

 
Just now, Sir Why You Little said:

No it would only be twice

Preliminary Final swap sides

could be 3 out of 4!!!

I am hoping for 2nd with cats on top. Then dees and cats straight into prelim after week 1. Only meet cats then  once in gf. The trick in top 4 is to win week 2.

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road for their 3rd interstate game in 4 weeks as they face a fit and firing Crows at Adelaide Oval. With finals now out of our grasps what are you hoping from the Dees today?

      • Thanks
    • 441 replies
  • WHAT’S NEXT? by The Oracle

    What’s next for a beleagured Melbourne Football Club down in form and confidence, facing  intense criticism and disapproval over some underwhelming recent performances and in the midst of a four game losing streak? Why, it’s Adelaide which boasts the best percentage in the AFL and has won six of its last seven games. The Crows are hot and not only that, the game is at the Adelaide Oval; yet another away fixture and the third in a row at a venue outside of Victoria. One of the problems the Demons have these days is that they rarely have the luxury of true home ground advantage, something they have enjoyed just once since mid April. 

      • Thanks
    • 2 replies
  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 213 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 231 replies