Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

My uneducated prediction of the first round influenced by various phantom drafts such as todays article from Cal Twomey.

1.       Western Bulldogs – JUH – (Matching bid)

2.       Adelaide – Riley Thilthorp

3.       North Melbourne – Elijah Hollands

4.       Sydney – Denver Grainer-Barras

5.       Hawthorn – Logan McDonald

6.       Gold Coast – Will Phillips

7.       Essendon – Tanner Bruhn

8.       Essendon – Zac Reid

9.       Essendon – Reef McInnes (bid not matched)

10.   Sydney – Braeden Campbell (matched bid)

11.   Adelaide – Finlay Macrae

12.   GWS – Heath Chapman

13.   North Melbourne – Archie Perkins

14.   Freemantle – Brayden Cook

15.   Port Adelaide – Lachie Jones

16.   GWS – Bailey Laurie

17.   Collingwood – Nik Cox

18.   GWS – Luke Pedlar

19.   Brisbane – Blake Coleman (matched bid)

20.   Collingwood – Conor Stone

21.   Sydney – Errol Guldon (matched bid)

22.   Richmond – Tom Powell

23.   Melbourne – Jack Carroll

24.   Melbourne – Jake Bowey

25.   GWS – Nathan O’Driscoll

26.   St Kilda – Sam Berry

 

*Edit: Just realised I missed Oliver Henry entirely, will have to re-work the order again.

Edited by Nascent
*missed a player

 

1.     Western Bulldogs – JUH – (Matching bid)
2.     Adelaide – Logan McDonald
3.     North Melbourne – Elijah Hollands
4.     Sydney – Denver Grainer-Barras
5.     Hawthorn – Will Phillips

6.     Gold Coast – Riley Thilthorpe
7.   Sydney – Braeden Campbell (matched bid)
8.    Essendon – Tanner Bruhn
9.    Essendon – Zac Reid
10.   Essendon – Conor Stone

11.   Adelaide – Finlay Macrae
12.   Port Adelaide – Lachie Jones (matched bid)
13.   GWS – Heath Chapman
14.   North Melbourne – Tom Powell
15.   Fremantle – Oliver Henry

16.   Coll - Nik Cox (traded for GWS in a deal not to bid for McInnes)
17.   Collingwood – Brayden Cook
18.   GWS – Archie Perkins
19.   GWS -  Bailey Laurie
20. Coll - Reef McInnes (matched bid)

21.   Richmond - Liam Kolar
22.   Sydney – Errol Guldon (matched bid)
23.  Brisbane – Blake Coleman (matched bid)
24.   Melbourne – Jack Carroll
25.   Adel - Luke Pedlar  (28 and 40 for 25 and 50)

26.   GWS – Nathan O'Driscoll
27.   St Kilda – Jake Bowey
28.  Melb  - Max Holmes 

I suspect we trade out of our 3rd pick and then use our late pick 50 (which I've upgraded to 40) on a project tall. Callow, Rosman or other.

Edited by DeeSpencer


32 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

1.     Western Bulldogs – JUH – (Matching bid)
2.     Adelaide – Logan McDonald
3.     North Melbourne – Elijah Hollands
4.     Sydney – Denver Grainer-Barras
5.     Hawthorn – Will Phillips

6.     Gold Coast – Riley Thilthorpe
7.   Sydney – Braeden Campbell (matched bid)
8.    Essendon – Tanner Bruhn
9.    Essendon – Zac Reid
10.   Essendon – Conor Stone

11.   Adelaide – Finlay Macrae
12.   Port Adelaide – Lachie Jones (matched bid)
13.   GWS – Heath Chapman
14.   North Melbourne – Tom Powell
15.   Fremantle – Oliver Henry

16.   Coll - Nik Cox (traded for GWS in a deal not to bid for McInnes)
17.   Collingwood – Brayden Cook
18.   GWS – Archie Perkins
19.   GWS -  Bailey Laurie
20. Coll - Reef McInnes (matched bid)

21.   Richmond - Liam Kolar
22.   Sydney – Errol Guldon (matched bid)
23.  Brisbane – Blake Coleman (matched bid)
24.   Melbourne – Jack Carroll
25.   Adel - Luke Pedlar  (28 and 40 for 25 and 50)

26.   GWS – Nathan O'Driscoll
27.   St Kilda – Jake Bowey
28.  Melb  - Max Holmes 

I suspect we trade out of our 3rd pick and then use our late pick 50 (which I've upgraded to 40) on a project tall. Callow, Rosman or other.

im confused. So our conesecutive picks in 18 and 19 become 24 and 28?

We'll bid on Errol Gulden,  which imo Sydney won't match the bid. Gulden becomes a Demon with our first pick. 

Second pick will be used on Jack Carroll if available. 

Don't be surprised if we also place a bid on Blake Coleman if Sydney match the Gulden pick. It'll be still up in the air whether Brisbane match or not.

Edited by dazzledavey36

3 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

We'll bid on Errol Gulden,  which imo Sydney won't match the bid. Gulden becomes a Demon with our first pick. 

Second pick will be used on Jack Carroll if available. 

Don't be surprised if we also place a bid on Blake Coleman if Sydney match the Gulden pick. It'll be still up in the air whether Brisbane match or not.

The Braeden Campbell bid probably determines what the Swans have left and any threat of going in to deficit next year. Overall though unless they don’t rate him the discount and ability to get a fringe top 20 player rather than a kid at the back of the draft - they’ve got to match that. 

 
3 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

We'll bid on Errol Gulden,  which imo Sydney won't match the bid. Gulden becomes a Demon with our first pick. 

Second pick will be used on Jack Carroll if available. 

Don't be surprised if we also place a bid on Blake Coleman if Sydney match the Gulden pick. It'll be still up in the air whether Brisbane match or not.

it probably depends where a bid a comes for Braeden Campbell. Sydney don't want to go into draft deficit next year because they don't want their first round pick to move down spots like Fremantle this year, if they go into deficit there's a fair chance they won't match a bid for Gulden. Hawthorn have been rumoured to bid on Campbell, if that happens and we bid on Gulden they'd be going into deficit and probably don't match a bid. But if say Essendon bid on Campbell at pick 8 and we bid on Gulden they should have enough points to cover both so we'll be rooting for Hawks on the night to put a bid on Campbell. Gulden wold be a great get.


1. Jack Carroll

2. Sam Berry

3. Kaine Baldwin

My guess is we trade up the draft, possibly with Ess and grab Macrea

4 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

We'll bid on Errol Gulden,  which imo Sydney won't match the bid. Gulden becomes a Demon with our first pick. 

Second pick will be used on Jack Carroll if available. 

Don't be surprised if we also place a bid on Blake Coleman if Sydney match the Gulden pick. It'll be still up in the air whether Brisbane match or not.

No chance of that happening, Dazzle, Sydney are committed and have pointsed themselves to match bids for both Gulden and Campbell and Brisbane have told clubs they match bids in the teens for Coleman.

  • Author
8 minutes ago, Travy14 said:

My guess is we trade up the draft, possibly with Ess and grab Macrea

We don't have the currency to get picks 6, 7 or 8 from the Bombers.

Our 1st rounder next year is gone.


Only inside word I've heard this year is that we're keen to trade further up the draft and we like Macrae and Stone.

35 minutes ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

We don't have the currency to get picks 6, 7 or 8 from the Bombers.

Our 1st rounder next year is gone.

We have 18 and 19. 

6 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

We'll bid on Errol Gulden,  which imo Sydney won't match the bid. Gulden becomes a Demon with our first pick. 

Second pick will be used on Jack Carroll if available. 

Don't be surprised if we also place a bid on Blake Coleman if Sydney match the Gulden pick. It'll be still up in the air whether Brisbane match or not.

If only! I agree we should potentially bid on Gulden if he’s available.  He would be an excellent pickup for the Dees BUT imv I think Swans will definitely match (they still are redfaced over not matching the Dogs pick on Josh Dunkley father son). Coleman too. Lions will definitely match that.  

9 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

If only! I agree we should potentially bid on Gulden if he’s available.  He would be an excellent pickup for the Dees BUT imv I think Swans will definitely match (they still are redfaced over not matching the Dogs pick on Josh Dunkley father son). Coleman too. Lions will definitely match that.  

I'm a big fan of Gulden. There's a lot of Tom Papley about with his x factor and arrogance. 

1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

I'm a big fan of Gulden. There's a lot of Tom Papley about with his x factor and arrogance. 

He couldn’t commit entirely but Kinnear Beatson (interviewed today on the afl show) sounded very confident they’d have the points to match for both kids. I think it would take a matched Campbell bid at 5 and a Gulden bid in the top 15 or so to force them not to match. 

Edited by DeeSpencer


1 hour ago, spirit of norm smith said:

If only! I agree we should potentially bid on Gulden if he’s available.  He would be an excellent pickup for the Dees BUT imv I think Swans will definitely match (they still are redfaced over not matching the Dogs pick on Josh Dunkley father son). Coleman too. Lions will definitely match that.  

The Dunkley’s did a deal with Sydney that they would only accept a father son nomination if the Swans agreed to only match interstate clubs. Josh only wanted to go to Sydney if it was to avoid another interstate club, he had a strong desire to stay in Victoria. The Swans not matching had nothing to do with not rating Josh. 

34 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

The Dunkley’s did a deal with Sydney that they would only accept a father son nomination if the Swans agreed to only match interstate clubs. Josh only wanted to go to Sydney if it was to avoid another interstate club, he had a strong desire to stay in Victoria. The Swans not matching had nothing to do with not rating Josh. 

that definitely sounds like draft tampering...................your sauce?

Edited by daisycutter

11 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

that definitely sounds like draft tampering...................your sauce?

It’s fine. Players can agree to be a father son or not. Clubs can decide if they want to match a father son or not. 
 

https://www.afl.com.au/news/160752/dunkleys-draft-deal-how-josh-ended-up-at-dogs

 
  • Author
3 hours ago, Travy14 said:

We have 18 and 19. 

Which will become something like picks 21 and 23.

The Bombers picks will fall back a spot but they arent going to trade pick 9 for 21 and 23, though I hope they do.

I would like us to grab Caleb Poulter a potential class act apparently  Happy to take Jack Carroll, Errol Gulden and Sam Berry though.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 47 replies