Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Posted

The Arc. Wow, how embarrassing for the AFL. Vlastuin clearly missed the ball, you could see daylight between his fist and the ball. Arc too scared to overrule.  Whately will go nuts.

  • Like 7
  • Angry 1

Posted
1 minute ago, rjay said:

 

Yep, will probably get a fine for that but honestly deserves weeks.

In a fair system he would get at least a week but as we know it's not a fair system.

Thought it would have been a 50m at least, happened after the whistle for the first infringement. 

  • Like 3

Posted

Poor quality game tonight. Low tackle count and bar a few minutes of Shia Bolton magic it’s been a snooze fest.

  • Like 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, Redleg said:

The Arc. Wow, how embarrassing for the AFL. Vlastuin clearly missed the ball, you could see daylight between his fist and the ball. Arc too scared to overrule.  Whately will go nuts.

The AFL is still amateur in this regard. Could decide a flag and it’s not good enough. 
if the technology is not there, stick with the goal ump 

  • Like 2

Posted
11 minutes ago, Redleg said:

The Arc. Wow, how embarrassing for the AFL. Vlastuin clearly missed the ball, you could see daylight between his fist and the ball. Arc too scared to overrule.  Whately will go nuts.

Weak as p#2ss by whoever made that decision

  • Like 1
Posted

Just had a meal at a friends house.  They are mad Richmond.  Except for the wife.  The wife of the family invited us around not realising richmond were playing in a knock out final.  I said to mate when I walked in, sorry mate, we'll eat and get the hell out of your hair.  Left at half time.  Got home and whacked on the internet and jumped on here to Demonland.  Because thats all we've got to feed the Dee bug.  Emotions rush back to me about losing those Cairns games.  Could have been more or less locked in in the finals with a week or two to play.  We [censored] up this year.  Still bloody hurts.

Posted
1 minute ago, loges said:

Weak as p#2ss by whoever made that decision

Watch the AFL say it was a correct decision. They hate any criticism.

  • Like 1

Posted
14 minutes ago, rjay said:

 

Yep, will probably get a fine for that but honestly deserves weeks.

In a fair system he would get at least a week but as we know it's not a fair system.

As Daisy said I can’t that getting weeks. It was a high tackle but the damage was done by Jones landing awkwardly. No justification for a suspension that I can see

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Redleg said:

Watch the AFL say it was a correct decision. They hate any criticism.

The original idea of the video review was for obvious/clear mistakes. Umpires call was the correct call by ARC


Posted
6 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Watch the AFL say it was a correct decision. They hate any criticism.

Absolutely disgrace to say that was inconclusive 

We could all see it at home

  • Like 3

Posted

This is a damp squib. Richmond haven’t had to get out of second gear.

Looking forward to one of Geelong or Collingwood getting knocked out tomorrow.

Posted

Hopefully tomorrow nights match is better. This one has been a fizzer. Saints have kicked themselves out of it.

Posted

Such horrible skills from the saints. 

the tigers are happy to sit back let them attack. When they get within 4 goals they get one and relax again. 


Posted
26 minutes ago, DubDee said:

As Daisy said I can’t that getting weeks. It was a high tackle but the damage was done by Jones landing awkwardly. No justification for a suspension that I can see

He slung him from around the neck...that's where the damage was done.

He also landed awkwardly because of the slinging motion of the tackle...


Posted

Terrible game, eps. saints kicking at goal, robbed themselves of any chance.

But you can see from the outset they could not handle the pressure that tigers bought to the game, could not adjust to the higher tempo as a team.  


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...