Jump to content

Featured Replies

4 minutes ago, TRIGON said:

Nothing to fall out over. One of the reasons people become friends is because they like the same things.

There’s more to it than eyes for the same girl, including some unwanted advances. They did fall out over it and it was one of the main reasons Langdon wanted out of WA.

Blakely is a pass or Langdon walks.

 

 

2 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

There’s more to it than eyes for the same girl, including some unwanted advances. They did fall out over it and it was one of the main reasons Langdon wanted out of WA.

Blakely is a pass or Langdon walks.

Fair enough then, all jokes aside. No means no.

Assume primary list reduces from 44 to 42 , with Bradtke additional and retained as a Cat-B rookie  

outs. Cwagner JWagner Dunkley Bennell and probably Chandler

Trade Outs. Tmc, OMc, Hannan, Preuss  

Retain  KK (on list but paid out for 2021 season) Jones Jetta  Nietschke moves to rookie list  

Trade ins. Ben Brown, Isaac Smith, Tom Phillips, Quinton Narkle 
 

Retain 3 draft picks.  

 
10 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

Why keep KK on the list if we have paid him out? What’s the benefit for both him and us?

My understanding is that you then get access to the doctors, services, support etc. from the AFL and football club. It is a right thing to do, rather than the smart thing to do by the sounds of it. But everything is speculative. 


1 hour ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Assume primary list reduces from 44 to 42 , with Bradtke additional and retained as a Cat-B rookie  

outs. Cwagner JWagner Dunkley Bennell and probably Chandler

Trade Outs. Tmc, OMc, Hannan, Preuss  

Retain  KK (on list but paid out for 2021 season) Jones Jetta  Nietschke moves to rookie list  

Trade ins. Ben Brown, Isaac Smith, Tom Phillips, Quinton Narkle 
 

Retain 3 draft picks.  

Good summary SONS hope we get those 4 

Whst draft no's would we have then?

23? 9? A third and fourth rounder 

undetstsnd  the draft no will be About5/8 picks after with FandS and NGA selections at some  stages

37 minutes ago, 58er said:

Good summary SONS hope we get those 4 

Whst draft no's would we have then?

23? 9? A third and fourth rounder 

undetstsnd  the draft no will be About5/8 picks after with FandS and NGA selections at some  stages

I reckon we get

Preuss - ***Giants future 2021 2nd round
Tmc - *Crows 2020 #44 3rd round,
Omc - pick 88 
Hannan - **Dogs future 2021 3rd round .
 

Brown - Kangas get Mfc 2020 #23 2nd round pick and the **Dogs future 2021 3rd round pick  

Phillips- ***Pies get Giants future 2nd round 2021 

Isaac Smith - free agent 

Narkle - Cats get *Crows #44 2020 3rd round pick  


2020 - 3 draft picks -#47,62,63   Turn sliders into diamonds  

2021 MFC draft picks untouched. 

1 hour ago, Dee-licious said:

My understanding is that you then get access to the doctors, services, support etc. from the AFL and football club. It is a right thing to do, rather than the smart thing to do by the sounds of it. But everything is speculative. 

It's usually more about the salary cap isn't it? Delist him and the pay out has to go in this years cap. Keeping him on the list a portion of it can go in to next years. Plus he can go on the non active list and be replaced by a rookie over summer that doesn't go against the cap.

 
3 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Assume primary list reduces from 44 to 42 , with Bradtke additional and retained as a Cat-B rookie  

outs. Cwagner JWagner Dunkley Bennell and probably Chandler

Trade Outs. Tmc, OMc, Hannan, Preuss  

Retain  KK (on list but paid out for 2021 season) Jones Jetta  Nietschke moves to rookie list  

Trade ins. Ben Brown, Isaac Smith, Tom Phillips, Quinton Narkle 
 

Retain 3 draft picks.  

lockhart, brown, nietschke, as cat A so 1 rookie spot + the KK replacement spot as he's inactive 

 

26 minutes ago, Turner said:

lockhart, brown, nietschke, as cat A so 1 rookie spot + the KK replacement spot as he's inactive 

 

Yes KK would be inactive and immediately replaced on the list by a rookie eg Lockhart for them to play 


37 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Yes KK would be inactive and immediately replaced on the list by a rookie eg Lockhart for them to play 

u don't need to be replaced to be able to play as of a couple years back, only applies to cat b rookies, now u get to add players to ur list to replace long term injuries and inactives hence why we signed dunkley in the mid season draft. cat a rookies can play from the get go

With Footy officially finished for the year I am guessing trade talks will really ramp up.

Got anything for us @Dr evil

3 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

With Footy officially finished for the year I am guessing trade talks will really ramp up.

Got anything for us @Dr evil

Brown and smith are coming, hind I think will as well, and there are two other players who’d walk into our best 22 that haven’t been mentioned on here that I’ve been asked not to name. But I’m sure demonlanders won’t complain when the names are revealed. 

we’re desperate to get young macrae through the door.
 

looking at a similar restructure to our list as the saints had last year introducing a lot of speed to their side 

3 minutes ago, Dr evil said:

Brown and smith are coming, hind I think will as well, and there are two other players who’d walk into our best 22 that haven’t been mentioned on here that I’ve been asked not to name. But I’m sure demonlanders won’t complain when the names are revealed. 

we’re desperate to get young macrae through the door.
 

looking at a similar restructure to our list as the saints had last year introducing a lot of speed to their side 

My favourite post of the weekend, it brings hope.

16 minutes ago, Dr evil said:

Brown and smith are coming, hind I think will as well, and there are two other players who’d walk into our best 22 that haven’t been mentioned on here that I’ve been asked not to name. But I’m sure demonlanders won’t complain when the names are revealed. 

we’re desperate to get young macrae through the door.
 

looking at a similar restructure to our list as the saints had last year introducing a lot of speed to their side 

I'm really enjoying your posts mate, but just be a little careful what you do reveal on here as the journos do read Demonland.

I've heard everything you've heard, but posting things like the Macrae stuff could actually jeopardise the club's hand a little bit. It's been mentioned a few times already on Demonland so it's probably fine now, but let's hope we can land him.

Anyway, each to their own. ?


6 minutes ago, A F said:

I'm really enjoying your posts mate, but just be a little careful what you do reveal on here as the journos do read Demonland.

I've heard everything you've heard, but posting things like the Macrae stuff could actually jeopardise the club's hand a little bit. It's been mentioned a few times already on Demonland so it's probably fine now, but let's hope we can land him.

Anyway, each to their own. ?

Understand what you’re saying mate! My general rule is if it’s been posted previously it’s fine to mention it. 

If you’re talking Finlay Macrae, I don’t see what the issue is discussing a potential draftee. Thanks @Dr evil for the info, have the two other potential players who would be best 22 been discussed on here? 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

1 minute ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

If you’re talking Finlay Macrae, I don’t see what the issue is discussing a potential draftee. Thanks @Dr evil for the info, have the two other potential players who would be best 22 been discussed on here? 

No they haven’t as far as I’m aware ET but when the time is right I’ll be sure to let you know first so the best news breaker on demonland can break the story ;)

28 minutes ago, Dr evil said:

Brown and smith are coming, hind I think will as well, and there are two other players who’d walk into our best 22 that haven’t been mentioned on here that I’ve been asked not to name. But I’m sure demonlanders won’t complain when the names are revealed. 

we’re desperate to get young macrae through the door.
 

looking at a similar restructure to our list as the saints had last year introducing a lot of speed to their side 

Polac? Merrett? Im just totally guessing btw.

Edited by Norm Smith's Curse

1 minute ago, Dr evil said:

No they haven’t as far as I’m aware ET but when the time is right I’ll be sure to let you know first so the best news breaker on demonland can break the story ;)

Any hints? ?


9 minutes ago, Norm Smith's Curse said:

Polac?

Polec's been mentioned multiply times, so the Doc isn't referring to him. 

9 minutes ago, adonski said:

Any hints? ?

Haha, you've opened a can of worms here, Doc. 

3 minutes ago, Dr evil said:

No they haven’t as far as I’m aware ET but when the time is right I’ll be sure to let you know first so the best news breaker on demonland can break the story ;)

Thanks Dr. #ETthetradebreaker

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

 
1 minute ago, Norm Smith's Curse said:

well speed might be the giveaway. 

Been well reported we'd ruled out Hogan I thought? :D

3 minutes ago, adonski said:

Any hints? ?

I know a bloke who’s good with riddles. I’ll shoot him a PM 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Sydney

    The two teams competing at the MCG on Sunday afternoon have each traversed a long and arduous path since their previous encounter on a sweltering March evening in Sydney a season and a half ago. Both experienced periods of success at various times last year. The Demons ran out of steam in midseason while the Swans went on to narrowly miss the ultimate prize in the sport. Now, they find themselves outside of finals contention as the season approaches the halfway mark. The winner this week will remain in contact with the leading pack, while the loser may well find itself on a precipice, staring into the abyss. The current season has presented numerous challenges for most clubs, particularly those positioned in the middle tier. The Essendon experience in suffering a significant 91-point loss to the Bulldogs, just one week after defeating the Swans, may not be typical, but it illustrates the unpredictability of outcomes under the league’s present set up. 

    • 2 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Brisbane

    “Max Gawn has been the heart and soul of the Dees for years now, but this recent recovery from a terrible start has been driven by him. He was everywhere again, and with the game in the balance, he took several key marks to keep the ball in the Dees forward half.” - The Monday Knee Jerk Reaction: Round Ten Of course, it wasn’t the efforts of one man that caused this monumental upset, but rather the work of the coach and his assistants and the other 22 players who took the ground, notably the likes of Jake Melksham, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kozzie Pickett but Max has been magnificent in taking ownership of his team and its welfare under the fire of a calamitous 0-5 start to the season. On Sunday, he provided the leadership that was needed to face up to the reigning premier and top of the ladder Brisbane Lions on their home turf and to prevail after a slow start, during which the hosts led by as much as 24 points in the second quarter. Titus O’Reily is normally comedic in his descriptions of the football but this time, he was being deadly serious. The Demons have come from a long way back and, although they still sit in the bottom third of the AFL pack, there’s a light at the end of the tunnel as they look to drive home the momentum inspired in the past four or five weeks by Max the Magnificent who was under such great pressure in those dark, early days of the season.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Southport

    The Southport Sharks came to Casey. They saw and they conquered a team with 16 AFL-listed players who, for the most part, wasted their time on the ground and failed to earn their keep. For the first half, the Sharks were kept in the game by the Demons’ poor use of the football, it’s disposal getting worse the closer the team got to its own goal and moreover, it got worse as the game progressed. Make no mistake, Casey was far and away the better team in the first half, it was winning the ruck duels through Tom Campbell’s solid performance but it was the scoreboard that told the story.

      • Haha
    • 3 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Sydney

    Just a game and percentage outside the Top 8, the Demons return to Melbourne to face the Sydney Swans at the MCG, with a golden opportunity to build on the momentum from toppling the reigning premiers on their own turf. Who comes in, and who makes way?

      • Like
    • 228 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Brisbane

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a famous victory by the Demons over the Lions at the Gabba.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 35 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Brisbane

    The Demons pulled off an absolute miracle at the Gabba coming from 24 points down in the 2nd Quarter to overrun the reigning premiers the Brisbane Lions winning by 11 points and keeping their season well and truly alive.

      • Clap
      • Haha
      • Love
      • Like
    • 498 replies
    Demonland