Jump to content

Featured Replies

the only players i'd list as absolutely keepers would be:

  • may
  • petracca
  • jackson
  • lever
  • gawn
  • oliver
  • langdon
  • rivers
  • pickett

everyone else is expendable or can be replaced with another b-grade equivalent, and the three youngsters are only on this list cos they show some promise going forward

that being said, if freo were to offer fyfe and hogan for jackson, for instance, you'd be a fool to say no

it comes back to the leigh montagna theory - pay yr best players big coin to hang around, cos the majority of the next tier and down are completely interchangeable around the league

 
57 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

the only players i'd list as absolutely keepers would be:

  • may
  • petracca
  • jackson
  • lever
  • gawn
  • oliver
  • langdon
  • rivers
  • pickett

everyone else is expendable or can be replaced with another b-grade equivalent, and the three youngsters are only on this list cos they show some promise going forward

that being said, if freo were to offer fyfe and hogan for jackson, for instance, you'd be a fool to say no

it comes back to the leigh montagna theory - pay yr best players big coin to hang around, cos the majority of the next tier and down are completely interchangeable around the league

Agree with those but as well I’d keep Salem because he’s a decent kick, Weideman because key forwards are hard to come by and I think he has shown enough improvement this year to show he’s worth persisting with. And Viney because he has leadership qualities.

56 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

the only players i'd list as absolutely keepers would be:

  • may
  • petracca
  • jackson
  • lever
  • gawn
  • oliver
  • langdon
  • rivers
  • pickett

I agree fully with this list.

On top of Hibberd and Viney, these are the only lads in my opinion who are AFL lever footballers at present.

FB:   Lever.       May.    Rivers

HB:  Hibberd.    ???      ????

C.    Langdon.   Viney.  ???

HF:   ???        ???      ????

FF:    Picket.    Jackson.   ???

R:   Gawn.   Oliver.   Trac. 

I’m a Weid fan but he still needs to keep improving to continually get a game.

There’s a hell of a lot of holes to be plugged imo.

I’ve lost the emotional attachment to most players as I’ve gotten older so I’m all for trading a star if the right deal came along.

We need to get real busy this year at trade week and look for some quality free agents.

If we bring in a Preuss or Tomlinson like I’ll be filthy.

Go hard for more quality please

 
On 8/5/2020 at 3:36 PM, whatwhatsaywhat said:

KEEP:

  • may
  • salem
  • petracca
  • jackson
  • lever
  • gawn
  • oliver
  • hibberd
  • langdon
  • melksham
  • hannan
  • tomlinson
  • vandenberg
  • jordan
  • rivers
  • weideman
  • sparrow
  • petty
  • pickett
  • lockhart

TRADE / RELEASE TO FREE AGENCY OPTIONS:

  • harmes
  • viney
  • brayshaw
  • preuss
  • t mac
  • o mac
  • anb
  • fritsch
  • smith

LIKELY DELIST / RETIRE:

  • jones
  • spargo
  • bedford
  • kolodjashnij
  • neitschke
  • hunt
  • baker
  • hore
  • chandler
  • brown
  • jetta
  • c wagner
  • j wagner
  • bradtke
  • dunkley

There’s a lot on this list who are simply not up to it. I’d be all for wholesale changes to find a few that may surprise us - we have nothing to lose because we are getting very little from 90% of the list.

Of the above, I’d move Melksham, Hannan and VDB down a rung. They are good 1 in every 4-5 weeks. That’s simply not enough.

Even if I don’t necessarily agree with Goody’s methods, the bare minimum to be an AFL player should be to turn up and give 100% every week. He’s got an impossible task with such inconsistent effort. 
 

We need to get a core group of players who have confidence and belief in their ability. Our guys turn to water as soon as any heat comes.

Maybe we need to invest in psychologists and teachers

 

 

16 hours ago, Deeko2 said:

I agree fully with this list.

On top of Hibberd and Viney, these are the only lads in my opinion who are AFL lever footballers at present.

FB:   Lever.       May.    Rivers

HB:  Hibberd.    ???      ????

C.    Langdon.   Viney.  ???

HF:   ???        ???      ????

FF:    Picket.    Jackson.   ???

R:   Gawn.   Oliver.   Trac. 

I’m a Weid fan but he still needs to keep improving to continually get a game.

There’s a hell of a lot of holes to be plugged imo.

I’ve lost the emotional attachment to most players as I’ve gotten older so I’m all for trading a star if the right deal came along.

We need to get real busy this year at trade week and look for some quality free agents.

If we bring in a Preuss or Tomlinson like I’ll be filthy.

Go hard for more quality please

I would argue that none of Jackson, Pickett or Rivers are “AFL standard” at this moment. That is not to say they will not become so next year. None would get a game with any of the top 4 clubs at the moment. And Hibberd definitely not, even though he is having a better year than past. So that leaves us pretty thin. Which is why I have been saying for the past month or so that a lot of posters over rate our list. As to trading for quality, we don’t have a lot of currency. We don’t have a first round pick this year. And quality free agents want to go to a club where they can see a premiership in the next couple of years. And that definitely isn’t us.

Edited by Guest


On 6/12/2020 at 4:17 AM, WERRIDEE said:

WEIDEMAN FOR DANIHER

Just no.

17 hours ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

the only players i'd list as absolutely keepers would be:

  • may
  • petracca
  • jackson
  • lever
  • gawn
  • oliver
  • langdon
  • rivers
  • pickett

everyone else is expendable or can be replaced with another b-grade equivalent, and the three youngsters are only on this list cos they show some promise going forward

that being said, if freo were to offer fyfe and hogan for jackson, for instance, you'd be a fool to say no

it comes back to the leigh montagna theory - pay yr best players big coin to hang around, cos the majority of the next tier and down are completely interchangeable around the league

Agree with all these players but  would add Weid. Its sad its such a small number.

Edited by leave it to deever

Anyone think Charlie Curnow is worth chasing. 

iirc we were very keen on him until the last minute at draft time.

 

the only players i'd list as absolutely keepers would be:

  • may
  • petracca
  • jackson
  • lever
  • gawn
  • oliver
  • langdon
  • rivers

Brayshaw I rate almost as highly as Petracca. If it is for J.Cameron Id sell either.

 


 How much longer do we persist with this setup / playing group before we make wholesale changes? IMO changing your best 22 by 5-10 would constitute a mini rebuild, 10+ would be a rebuild. 
 

So at what point do we pull the trigger on a mini rebuild? Do we persist with the current mob for another year  and target 2-3 key players for example Finlayson or equivalent for Tmac, Williams for Harmes / Brayshaw or Viney, Papley for a Spargo / Fritsch/ AnB during the trade period?

Do we think that a coach change will translate to immediate success? Because a new coach would bring a new game style / plan , which with this mob might Struggle to implement in one pre season.

My guess is as good as anyone else’s but knowing what we know, I think we will probably do very little given the uncertainty in list sizes etc.

14 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Hannan’s contract is up end of this season IIRC, keep or delist? 

One year base deal with game incentives. Otherwise delist. Realistically in a shortened year with shortened games and limited view of a draft which was already highly compromised due to high NGA’s I dont think you can cut harder that 7-8 players that are unknowns. There will be players that get contracts that are not first 18 but that is fine as long as the length and the salary is commensurate with the role. 

Edited by big_red_fire_engine

16 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Hannan’s contract is up end of this season IIRC, keep or delist? 

Without giving too much thought into who else will be delisted, I would say delist him. Just doesn’t do enough often enough for me.

24 minutes ago, big_red_fire_engine said:

One year base deal with game incentives. Otherwise delist. Realistically in a shortened year with shortened games and limited view of a draft which was already highly compromised due to high NGA’s I dont think you can cut harder that 7-8 players that are unknowns. There will be players that get contracts that are not first 18 but that is fine as long as the length and the salary is commensurate with the role. 

Delist

27 minutes ago, trout said:

Without giving too much thought into who else will be delisted, I would say delist him. Just doesn’t do enough often enough for me.

He does some good things when we’re up and about but goes missing far too often. I’m 50/50 at the moment, depending on who else is likely to get cut. Here’s the current list with OOC date, with thanks to @Lucifer's Hero

image.png.a1be417cea47536c957a26f408331464.png

Edited by Ethan Tremblay


Based on the view of not delisting harder than 7 (does not mean we dont trade above this) we need to clear those we dont believe can play a role in 2021 and beyond. We also need to consider the amount of contract and length and size they would partake. 

I would be delisting in order Jones (retire), Hore, Hunt, J Wagner, Smith, OMac, Hannan,

I would be promoting Lockhart to the list and delisting Brown and C Wagner and possibly Dunkley

Whilst in contract I will not be surprised to see KK retire due to his concussion issues.

 

1 minute ago, big_red_fire_engine said:

Based on the view of not delisting harder than 7 (does not mean we dont trade above this) we need to clear those we dont believe can play a role in 2021 and beyond. We also need to consider the amount of contract and length and size they would partake. 

I would be delisting in order Jones (retire), Hore, Hunt, J Wagner, Smith, OMac, Hannan,

I would be promoting Lockhart to the list and delisting Brown and C Wagner and possibly Dunkley

Whilst in contract I will not be surprised to see KK retire due to his concussion issues.

 

Agree with pretty much all of those, perhaps with the exception of Hore, if OMac and Smith are gone then I’d like to retain him. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

On 6/12/2020 at 4:17 AM, WERRIDEE said:

I know it's early but I thought it would be a little fun to predict trades, promotions and delistings.

TRADE

WEIDEMAN FOR DANIHER.

I know Daniher is a free agent but we can do what Geelong did with Dangerfield and trade for him.

SPARROW AND PETTY FOR PORT'S FIRST RND PICK.

O.MCDONALD FOR A 3RD RND PICK

HUNT FOR A 3RD RND PICK

DELIST

SPARGO

HIBBERD

KOLODJASHNIJ

C.WAGNER

J.WAGNER

 

PROMOTE

BENNELL

LOCKHART

BRADTKE

 

SENIOR LIST

MAY

JONES

SALEM

HARMES

PETRACCA

JACKSON

VINEY

LEVER

DANIHER

BRAYSHAW

GAWN

BEDFORD

OLIVER

FIRST RND PICK

LANGDON

SECOND RND PICK

BENNELL

MELKSHAM

HANNAN

TOMLINSON

PREUSS

VANDENBERG

JORDON

RIVERS

MCDONALD

3RD RND PICK

NEITSCHKE

3RD RND PICK

3RD RND PICK

NEAL-BULLEN

FRITSCH

BAKER

HORE

BRADTKE

PICKETT

JETTA

LOCKHART

SMITH

 

ROOKIE

CHANDLER (3RD YEAR)

BROWN (SECOND YEAR)

DUNKLEY (3RD YEAR)

ROOKIE (RND 1)

ROOKIE (RND 2)

ROOKIE (RND 3)

Viney  and  Brayshaw  for  Dangerfield. I am sure Geelong  would be interested .

9 minutes ago, big_red_fire_engine said:

Based on the view of not delisting harder than 7 (does not mean we dont trade above this) we need to clear those we dont believe can play a role in 2021 and beyond. We also need to consider the amount of contract and length and size they would partake. 

I would be delisting in order Jones (retire), Hore, Hunt, J Wagner, Smith, OMac, Hannan,

I would be promoting Lockhart to the list and delisting Brown and C Wagner and possibly Dunkley

Whilst in contract I will not be surprised to see KK retire due to his concussion issues.

I'm thinking that other clubs might pick up Hunt, Omac or Hannan. 

For whatever reason their careers at the dees seem limited and they could fulfill a need at other clubs so I would like to see their careers continue. 

15 minutes ago, big_red_fire_engine said:

Based on the view of not delisting harder than 7 (does not mean we dont trade above this) we need to clear those we dont believe can play a role in 2021 and beyond. We also need to consider the amount of contract and length and size they would partake. 

I would be delisting in order Jones (retire), Hore, Hunt, J Wagner, Smith, OMac, Hannan,

I would be promoting Lockhart to the list and delisting Brown and C Wagner and possibly Dunkley

Whilst in contract I will not be surprised to see KK retire due to his concussion issues.

 

I think i would delist TMac before Brown. At least Brown can move.


14 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

I'm thinking that other clubs might pick up Hunt, Omac or Hannan. 

For whatever reason their careers at the dees seem limited and they could fulfill a need at other clubs so I would like to see their careers continue. 

They may but I doubt its a worthwhile trade it will be as delisting.

On Hore I would retain on a one year deal just because he hasn’t had a run at it this year. 

Just now, big_red_fire_engine said:

They may but I doubt its a worthwhile trade it will be as delisting.

On Hore I would retain on a one year deal just because he hasn’t had a run at it this year. 

Yeah, good point.

MFC has been pretty decent at delisting players early so they can be taken as 'Delisted Free Agents' (which cost the receiving club nothing but a list spot). 

Thinking about it a bit further, shrinking player lists may deter clubs from taking DFA's. 

DELIST: Hannan, Hunt, OMcDonald, Smith, CWagner, JWagner

RETIRE: Jones, Jetta, Kolodjashnij

UPGRADE: Lockhart

TRADE BAIT: TMcDonald (Ess/Haw/Gee/Coll/Dogs), ANB (good luck finding anyone), VDB (sydney as per 2yrs ago?)

DELIST TO RE-ROOKIE: Neitschke 

 
28 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Agree with pretty much all of those, perhaps with the exception of Hore, if OMac and Smith are gone then I’d like to retain him. 

Would like to see Smith tried as a forward otherwise I think a big clean out is necessary. There is a lot of deadwood on our list.Wish we were like Melbourne Storm, they've been around 20 odd years and have won premierships, played finals and always been in contention. Unfortunately as a club we have accepted "not good enough" for too long and too many of our players play for the paycheck and so they can say that they are AFL players - sad indictment on this administration and all previous ones since 1964.

.

Edited by Turner


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Essendon

    Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

      • Like
    • 470 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 05

    Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • Haha
    • 120 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Geelong

    There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Geelong

    I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 04

    Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • Like
    • 273 replies
    Demonland